BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27538900)

  • 21. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the reliability of the Thai version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS).
    Trathitiphan W; Paholpak P; Sirichativapee W; Wisanuyotin T; Laupattarakasem P; Sukhonthamarn K; Jeeravipoolvarn P; Kosuwon W
    Rheumatol Int; 2016 Oct; 36(10):1455-8. PubMed ID: 27262714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Linguistic validation of a widely used recovery score: quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15).
    Kara U; Şimşek F; Kamburoğlu H; Özhan MÖ; Alakuş Ü; İnce ME; Eksert S; Özkan G; Eşkin MB; Şenkal S
    Turk J Med Sci; 2022 Apr; 52(2):427-435. PubMed ID: 36161615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. CROATIAN VERSION OF THE QUALITY OF RECOVERY QUESTIONNAIRE (QoR-40): TRANSCULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION.
    Miklić Bublić M; Miklić P; Barl P; Matas M; Sekulić A
    Acta Clin Croat; 2021 Jun; 60(2):237-245. PubMed ID: 34744273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validity and Reliability of Thai Version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Subjective Form.
    Arunakul M; Arunakul P; Suesiritumrong C; Angthong C; Chernchujit B
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2015 Jun; 98(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 26219160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reliability and validity of Thai version Quality of Life Questionnaire (OSA-18) for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea.
    Kuptanon T; Chukumnerd J; Leejakpai A; Preutthipan A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2015 May; 98(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 26058274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review.
    Gornall BF; Myles PS; Smith CL; Burke JA; Leslie K; Pereira MJ; Bost JE; Kluivers KB; Nilsson UG; Tanaka Y; Forbes A
    Br J Anaesth; 2013 Aug; 111(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 23471753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the postoperative quality of recovery 15 (QoR-15) questionnaire for Spanish-speaking patients: A prospective cohort study.
    Morales-Ariza V; Loaiza-Aldeán Y; de Miguel M; Peña-Navarro M; Martínez-Silva O; González-Tallada A; Manrique-Muñoz S; de Nadal M
    Am J Surg; 2023 Apr; 225(4):740-747. PubMed ID: 36414472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dialectal influence on chronic pulmonary disease assessment test: the reliability and validity study.
    Pothirat C; Chaiwong W; Phetsuk N; Liwsrisakun C; Bumroongkit C; Deesomchok A; Theerakittikul T; Limsukon A
    Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis; 2015; 10():541-8. PubMed ID: 25792822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia.
    Kleif J; Waage J; Christensen KB; Gögenur I
    Br J Anaesth; 2018 Jan; 120(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 29397134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery.
    Chazapis M; Walker EM; Rooms MA; Kamming D; Moonesinghe SR
    Br J Anaesth; 2016 Feb; 116(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 26787793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliability and validity of a Thai version of the edmonton symptom assessment scale (ESAS-Thai).
    Chinda M; Jaturapatporn D; Kirshen AJ; Udomsubpayakul U
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2011 Dec; 42(6):954-60. PubMed ID: 21621964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Myles PS; Shulman MA; Reilly J; Kasza J; Romero L
    Br J Anaesth; 2022 Jun; 128(6):1029-1039. PubMed ID: 35430086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Translation and validation of the Norwegian version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15.
    Bergestuen L; Moger T; Oterhals K; Pfeffer F; Nestvold T; Norderval S; Nymo LS; Havnes K; Lassen K; Breivik K
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2024 Jan; 68(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 37682626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Translation and validation of the Japanese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Questionnaire.
    Nakatani S; Ida M; Tanaka Y; Okamoto N; Wang X; Nakatani H; Sato M; Naito Y; Kawaguchi M
    J Anesth; 2021 Jun; 35(3):426-433. PubMed ID: 33763758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validity and Reliability of the Thai Version of Dysfunctional Voiding Symptom Score (DVSS) Questionnaire.
    Piyaphanee N; Sirikuntaramas S; Sumboonnanonda A; Farhat WA
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2016; 100(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 29911372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ): A validation of the reliability of the Thai version.
    Poosiripinyo T; Paholpak P; Jirarattanaphochai K; Kosuwon W; Sirichativapee W; Wisanuyotin T; Laupattarakasem P; Sukhonthamarn K; Jeeravipoolvarn P; Sakakibara T; Kasai Y
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 Jan; 22(1):34-37. PubMed ID: 27793440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability of Thai version of SF-36 questionnaire for the evaluation of quality of life in cardiac patients.
    Krittayaphong R; Bhuripanyo K; Raungratanaamporn O; Chotinaiwatarakul C; Chaowalit N; Punlee K; Kangkagate C; Chaithiraphan S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Nov; 83 Suppl 2():S130-6. PubMed ID: 11194004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire version 2.0 to assess Quality of Life in Patients with Spinal Metastasis.
    Luksanapruksa P; Phikunsri P; Trathitephun W; Santipas B; Suvithayasiri S; Wattanapaiboon K; Wilartratsami S
    Spine J; 2021 Nov; 21(11):1920-1924. PubMed ID: 34010685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Validation of the Swedish version of Quality of Recovery score -15: a multicentre, cohort study.
    Lyckner S; Böregård IL; Zetterlund EL; Chew MS
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2018 Aug; 62(7):893-902. PubMed ID: 29417552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Psychometric evaluation of a quality of recovery score for the postanesthesia care unit-A preliminary validation study.
    Kahl U; Brodersen K; Kaiser S; Krause L; Klinger R; Plümer L; Zöllner C; Fischer M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0289685. PubMed ID: 37582085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.