277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27539001)
1. The Influence of Voice Sample Length in the Auditory-Perceptual Judgment of Overall Voice Quality.
Barsties B; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):202-210. PubMed ID: 27539001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.
Barsties B; Beers M; Ten Cate L; Van Ballegooijen K; Braam L; De Groot M; Van Der Kant M; Kruitwagen C; Maryn Y
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Apr; 42(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26525078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of the Voice Sample Length in Perceptual and Acoustic Voice Quality Analysis.
Englert M; Lima L; Latoszek BBV; Behlau M
J Voice; 2022 Jul; 36(4):582.e23-582.e32. PubMed ID: 32792161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Teachers' Perception of Vocal Quality Compared With Professional Perception.
Selevan E; Schorr E; Pekarsky R; Mitta S; Diamont S; Stept E; Oliveira G
J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):763.e17-763.e21. PubMed ID: 26739856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.
Hosokawa K; Barsties B; Iwahashi T; Iwahashi M; Kato C; Iwaki S; Sasai H; Miyauchi A; Matsushiro N; Inohara H; Ogawa M; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):260.e1-260.e9. PubMed ID: 27287930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
Uloza V; Petrauskas T; Padervinskis E; Ulozaitė N; Barsties B; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.
Maryn Y; Kim HT; Kim J
J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concatenation of the Moving Window Technique for Auditory-Perceptual Analysis of Voice Quality.
Ehrlich B; Lin L; Jiang J
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Nov; 27(4):1426-1433. PubMed ID: 30304342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How Do Voice Perceptual Changes Predict Acoustic Parameters in Persian Voice Patients?
Hosseinifar S; Torabinezhad F; Ghelichi L; Roudbari M; Silverman EP; Faham M
J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):705-709. PubMed ID: 29033255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening for Voice Disorders in Older Adults (RAVI)-Part III: Cutoff Score and Clinical Consistency.
Pernambuco L; Espelt A; Costa de Lima K
J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):117.e17-117.e22. PubMed ID: 27085911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Examination of Pre- and Posttreatment Acoustic Versus Auditory Perceptual Analyses of Voice Across Four Common Voice Disorders.
Gillespie AI; Gartner-Schmidt J; Lewandowski A; Awan SN
J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):169-176. PubMed ID: 28688672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Immediate Effect of Stimulability Assessment on Acoustic, Aerodynamic, and Patient-Perceptual Measures of Voice.
Gillespie AI; Gartner-Schmidt J
J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):507.e9-507.e14. PubMed ID: 26233832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The cut-off analysis using visual analogue scale and cepstral assessments on severity of voice disorder.
Lee YW; Kim GH; Bae IH; Park HJ; Wang SG; Kwon SB
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Dec; 43(4):175-180. PubMed ID: 29671679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
Maryn Y; Corthals P; Van Cauwenberge P; Roy N; De Bodt M
J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptual-auditory and Acoustic Analysis of Air Traffic Controllers' Voices Pre- and Postshift.
Villar AC; Korn GP; Azevedo RR
J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):768.e11-768.e15. PubMed ID: 26778327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
Lu FL; Matteson S
J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Exploration of an Objective Model for Roughness With Several Acoustic Markers.
Latoszek BBV; De Bodt M; Gerrits E; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 28572016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Relationship Between the Aerodynamic Parameters of Voice and Perceptual Evaluation in the Iranian Population With or Without Voice Disorders.
Aghajanzadeh M; Darouie A; Dabirmoghaddam P; Salehi A; Rahgozar M
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):250.e9-250.e15. PubMed ID: 27542776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Auditory-Perceptual Training With Natural Voice Anchors on Vocal Quality Evaluation.
Dos Santos PCM; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Gama ACC
J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 29331406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
