146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2753999)
1. Efficacy of duplicate genital specimens and repeated testing for confirming positive results for chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen.
Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Levisky JS
J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Jun; 27(6):1218-21. PubMed ID: 2753999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of endocervical specimen quality on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and on the incidence of false-positive results with the Chlamydiazyme method.
Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Murray CL; Levisky JS
J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Jun; 28(6):1108-13. PubMed ID: 2199483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of first-voided urine specimens with endocervical swab specimens for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.
Kellogg JA; Vanderhoff BT; Seiple JW; Hick ME
Arch Fam Med; 1994 Aug; 3(8):672-5. PubMed ID: 7952252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infections.
Monno R; De Vito D; Vena GA; Mosca A; Miragliotta G
Microbiologica; 1987 Oct; 10(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 3320688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cytobrushes with swabs for recovery of endocervical cells and for Chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Klinedinst JL; Levisky JS
J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Nov; 30(11):2988-90. PubMed ID: 1452671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Confirmatory testing demonstrates that false-positive rates in the chlamydiazyme assay are influenced by gender and genital specimen type.
Chernesky M; Jang D; Sellors J; Castriciano S; Pickard L; Luinstra K; Mahony J
Sex Transm Dis; 1993; 20(6):301-6. PubMed ID: 8108751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of endocervical specimen quality on apparent prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections diagnosed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method.
Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Klinedinst JL; Levisky JS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1991 Dec; 115(12):1223-7. PubMed ID: 1722665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cytobrush in collection of cervical specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Moncada J; Schachter J; Shipp M; Bolan G; Wilber J
J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Aug; 27(8):1863-6. PubMed ID: 2671035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections by cell culture and two enzyme immunoassays detecting different chlamydial antigens.
Mahony J; Castriciano S; Sellors J; Stewart I; Cunningham I; Landis S; Seidelman W; Grant L; Devlin C; Chernesky M
J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Sep; 27(9):1934-8. PubMed ID: 2674191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of urine, first and second endourethral swabs for PCR based detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male patients.
Sugunendran H; Birley HD; Mallinson H; Abbott M; Tong CY
Sex Transm Infect; 2001 Dec; 77(6):423-6. PubMed ID: 11714940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Altering TestPack Chlamydia sampling swab decreases testing time.
Coleman P
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1991; 14(2):171-2. PubMed ID: 1831415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from men.
Ehret JM; Leszcynski JC; Douglas JM; Genova SL; Chernesky MA; Moncada J; Schachter J
J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Oct; 31(10):2702-5. PubMed ID: 8253969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. TestPack Chlamydia, a new rapid assay for the direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Coleman P; Varitek V; Mushahwar IK; Marchlewicz B; Safford J; Hansen J; Kurpiewski G; Grier T
J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Dec; 27(12):2811-4. PubMed ID: 2592542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by nucleic acid amplification testing: our evaluation suggests that CDC-recommended approaches for confirmatory testing are ill-advised.
Schachter J; Chow JM; Howard H; Bolan G; Moncada J
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 44(7):2512-7. PubMed ID: 16825373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnosis by AMPLICOR PCR of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from women and men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics.
Quinn TC; Welsh L; Lentz A; Crotchfelt K; Zenilman J; Newhall J; Gaydos C
J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jun; 34(6):1401-6. PubMed ID: 8735088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should we consider alternatives to combined cervical and urethral swabs for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in females?
Mahto M; Mallinson H
Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Jul; 83(4):335-6. PubMed ID: 17611234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary tract specimens using an automated enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay.
Gun-Munro J; Mahony J; Lyn P; Luinstra K; Smaill F; Richardson H
Sex Transm Dis; 1996; 23(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 8919737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens by enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence in genital specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women.
Chernesky MA; Mahony JB; Castriciano S; Mores M; Stewart IO; Landis SJ; Seidelman W; Sargeant EJ; Leman C
J Infect Dis; 1986 Jul; 154(1):141-8. PubMed ID: 3519787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Usefulness of real-time PCR in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in endocervical swabs and first-voided urine specimens].
Hamasuna R; Kawai S; Ando Y; Ito K; Kurashima M; Nishimura H; Yamaguchi T; Yoshimura M; Kobayashi T; Muratani T; Matsumoto T
Kansenshogaku Zasshi; 2013 Sep; 87(5 Suppl 8):17-23. PubMed ID: 24475696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicenter evaluation of the fully automated COBAS AMPLICOR PCR test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.
Vincelette J; Schirm J; Bogard M; Bourgault AM; Luijt DS; Bianchi A; van Voorst Vader PC; Butcher A; Rosenstraus M
J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jan; 37(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 9854067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
