These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2753999)

  • 21. Detection of endocervical anti-Chlamydia trachomatis immunoglobulin A in pregnant women by a rapid, 6-minute enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay: comparison with PCR and chlamydial antigen detection methods.
    Witkin SS; Bongiovanni AM; Inglis SR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Jul; 35(7):1781-3. PubMed ID: 9196193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Direct fluorescent-antibody confirmation of chlamydial antigen below the detection threshold of the chlamydiazyme enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
    Kellogg JA; Seiple JW; Stroll ES
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Jun; 31(6):1646-7. PubMed ID: 8315010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from the cervix.
    Amortegui AJ; Meyer MP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Apr; 65(4):523-6. PubMed ID: 3885103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison between the LCx Probe system and the COBAS AMPLICOR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in patients attending a clinic for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    van Doornum GJ; Schouls LM; Pijl A; Cairo I; Buimer M; Bruisten S
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 11230391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assays in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: how valid are they?
    Weismeier E; Bruckner DA; Malotte CK; Manduke L
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Apr; 9(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 3180707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay and Abbott Chlamydiazyme in the detection of chlamydial infections in women.
    Olsen MA; Sambol AR; Bohnert VA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Feb; 119(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7848062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Confirmation of positive results for chlamydial antigen by the Chlamydiazyme assay: value of repeated testing and a blocking antibody assay.
    Olsen MA; Sambol AR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Jul; 31(7):1892-5. PubMed ID: 8349769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection in pregnancy and its verification by antibody blocking assay.
    Malenie R; Joshi PJ; Mathur MD
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 24(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 16687858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Enzyme amplified immunoassay: a novel technique applied to direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.
    Pugh SF; Slack RC; Caul EO; Paul ID; Appleton PN; Gatley S
    J Clin Pathol; 1985 Oct; 38(10):1139-41. PubMed ID: 3902899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of cervical, urethral, and urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.
    Sellors JW; Mahony JB; Jang D; Pickard L; Goldsmith CH; Gafni A; Chernesky MA
    J Infect Dis; 1991 Jul; 164(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 2056207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of first void urine and urogenital swab specimens for detection of Mycoplasma genitalium and Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction in patients attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic.
    Jensen JS; Björnelius E; Dohn B; Lidbrink P
    Sex Transm Dis; 2004 Aug; 31(8):499-507. PubMed ID: 15273584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of antigen detection, polymerase chain reaction and culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infection.
    Hallsworth PG; Hefford C; Waddell RG; Gordon DL
    Pathology; 1995 Apr; 27(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 7567147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Non-invasive detection of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections in asymptomatic males and females by enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme).
    Adjei O; Lal V
    J Trop Med Hyg; 1994 Feb; 97(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 8107174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in swab specimens by the Hybrid Capture II and PACE 2 nucleic acid probe tests.
    Modarress KJ; Cullen AP; Jaffurs WJ; Troutman GL; Mousavi N; Hubbard RA; Henderson S; Lörincz AT
    Sex Transm Dis; 1999 May; 26(5):303-8. PubMed ID: 10333286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of performances of two commercially available tests, a PCR assay and a ligase chain reaction test, in detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Puolakkainen M; Hiltunen-Back E; Reunala T; Suhonen S; Lähteenmäki P; Lehtinen M; Paavonen J
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Jun; 36(6):1489-93. PubMed ID: 9620366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen by enzyme immunoassay: importance of confirmatory testing.
    Fonseca K; Megran DW; Anand CM
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Mar; 48(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 7730479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance of the Gen-Probe AMPLIFIED Chlamydia Trachomatis Assay in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical and urine specimens from women and urethral and urine specimens from men attending sexually transmitted disease and family planning clinics.
    Ferrero DV; Meyers HN; Schultz DE; Willis SA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3230-3. PubMed ID: 9774570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multiplex PCR for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Genitourinary specimens.
    Mahony JB; Luinstra KE; Tyndall M; Sellors JW; Krepel J; Chernesky M
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Nov; 33(11):3049-53. PubMed ID: 8576375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from men and women as an alternative to swabs.
    Tchoudomirova K; Tchapanova A; Nouchov F
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 1997; 39(4):30-6. PubMed ID: 9575647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multiple site sampling does not increase the sensitivity of Chlamydia trachomatis detection in infertility patients.
    Dietrich W; Rath M; Stanek G; Apfalter P; Huber JC; Tempfer C
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 18990379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.