These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27540031)

  • 1. Optimization of a Moving Averages Program Using a Simulated Annealing Algorithm: The Goal is to Monitor the Process Not the Patients.
    Ng D; Polito FA; Cervinski MA
    Clin Chem; 2016 Oct; 62(10):1361-71. PubMed ID: 27540031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Average of Patient Deltas: Patient-Based Quality Control Utilizing the Mean Within-Patient Analyte Variation.
    Cembrowski GS; Xu Q; Cervinski MA
    Clin Chem; 2021 Jul; 67(7):1019-1029. PubMed ID: 33993233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Moving standard deviation and moving sum of outliers as quality tools for monitoring analytical precision.
    Liu J; Tan CH; Badrick T; Loh TP
    Clin Biochem; 2018 Feb; 52():112-116. PubMed ID: 29107011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Moving sum of number of positive patient result as a quality control tool.
    Liu J; Tan CH; Badrick T; Loh TP
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Oct; 55(11):1709-1714. PubMed ID: 28328525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of ratios upon improving patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC) performance.
    Li Y; Chen X; Zhao Y
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2024 Mar; 62(4):646-656. PubMed ID: 37862239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection of an optimal neural network architecture for computer-aided detection of microcalcifications--comparison of automated optimization techniques.
    Gurcan MN; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Petrick N
    Med Phys; 2001 Sep; 28(9):1937-48. PubMed ID: 11585225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Moving average procedures as an additional tool for real-time analytical quality control: challenges and opportunities of implementation in small-volume medical laboratories.
    Lukić V; Ignjatović S
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2022 Feb; 32(1):010705. PubMed ID: 34955673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ten-Month Evaluation of the Routine Application of Patient Moving Average for Real-Time Quality Control in a Hospital Setting.
    van Rossum HH; van den Broek D
    J Appl Lab Med; 2020 Nov; 5(6):1184-1193. PubMed ID: 32533149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimization and validation of moving average quality control procedures using bias detection curves and moving average validation charts.
    van Rossum HH; Kemperman H
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Feb; 55(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 27522620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. First application of quantum annealing to IMRT beamlet intensity optimization.
    Nazareth DP; Spaans JD
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 May; 60(10):4137-48. PubMed ID: 25932613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementation and application of moving average as continuous analytical quality control instrument demonstrated for 24 routine chemistry assays.
    Rossum HHV; Kemperman H
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Jul; 55(8):1142-1151. PubMed ID: 28076303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Moving average quality control: principles, practical application and future perspectives.
    van Rossum HH
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 May; 57(6):773-782. PubMed ID: 30307894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed in the catheterization laboratory (minimalist approach) versus hybrid operating room (standard approach): outcomes and cost analysis.
    Babaliaros V; Devireddy C; Lerakis S; Leonardi R; Iturra SA; Mavromatis K; Leshnower BG; Guyton RA; Kanitkar M; Keegan P; Simone A; Stewart JP; Ghasemzadeh N; Block P; Thourani VH
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(8):898-904. PubMed ID: 25086843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Coupled simulated annealing.
    Xavier-de-Souza S; Suykens JA; Vandewalle J; Bolle D
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2010 Apr; 40(2):320-35. PubMed ID: 19651558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization of batch and fed-batch bioreactors using simulated annealing.
    Kookos IK
    Biotechnol Prog; 2004; 20(4):1285-8. PubMed ID: 15296464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulated annealing optimization in wavefront shaping controlled transmission.
    Fayyaz Z; Mohammadian N; Salimi F; Fatima A; Tabar MRR; Avanaki MRN
    Appl Opt; 2018 Jul; 57(21):6233-6242. PubMed ID: 30118010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Binary optimization by momentum annealing.
    Okuyama T; Sonobe T; Kawarabayashi KI; Yamaoka M
    Phys Rev E; 2019 Jul; 100(1-1):012111. PubMed ID: 31499928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scan path optimization with/without clustering for active beam delivery in charged particle therapy.
    Dias MF; Riboldi M; Seco J; Castelhano I; Pella A; Mirandola A; Peralta L; Ciocca M; Orecchia R; Baroni G
    Phys Med; 2015 Mar; 31(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 25616862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of combining data from multiple instruments on performance of patient-based real-time quality control.
    Zhou Q; Loh TP; Badrick T; Lim CY
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2021 Jun; 31(2):020705. PubMed ID: 33927555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the modeling of breath-by-breath oxygen uptake kinetics at the onset of high-intensity exercises: simulated annealing vs. GRG2 method.
    Bernard O; Alata O; Francaux M
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2006 Mar; 100(3):1049-58. PubMed ID: 16254071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.