These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2754103)

  • 1. Intensity discrimination determined with two paradigms in normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Turner CW; Zwislocki JJ; Filion PR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jul; 86(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 2754103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intensity just-noticeable differences at equal-loudness levels in normal and pathological ears.
    Stillman JA; Zwislocki JJ; Zhang M; Cefaratti LK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jan; 93(1):425-34. PubMed ID: 8423259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationships of intensity discrimination to sensation and loudness levels: dependence on sound frequency.
    Ozimek E; Zwislocki JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3304-20. PubMed ID: 8914312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Just noticeable differences for intensity and their relation to loudness.
    Johnson JH; Turner CW; Zwislocki JJ; Margolis RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):983-91. PubMed ID: 8445133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the relations of intensity jnd's to loudness and neural noise.
    Zwislocki JJ; Jordan HN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):772-80. PubMed ID: 3958318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of otoacoustic emissions on just-noticeable differences for intensity in normally hearing subjects.
    Probst R; Harris FP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jul; 100(1):504-10. PubMed ID: 8675843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forward- and backward-masked intensity discrimination measured using forced-choice and adjustment procedures.
    Turner CW; Horwitz AR; Souza PE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2121-6. PubMed ID: 7963025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pure-tone pitch anomalies. II. Pitch-intensity effects and diplacusis in impaired ears.
    Burns EM; Turner C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1530-40. PubMed ID: 3711452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intensity resolution and loudness in high-pass noise.
    Schlauch RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2171-9. PubMed ID: 8201113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin.
    Buus S; Florentine M; Poulsen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3464-80. PubMed ID: 10380670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency discrimination of stylized synthetic vowels with a single formant.
    Lyzenga J; Horst JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Sep; 102(3):1755-67. PubMed ID: 9301053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency discrimination of stylized synthetic vowels with two formants.
    Lyzenga J; Horst JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Nov; 104(5):2956-66. PubMed ID: 9821340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection thresholds for sinusoidal frequency modulation.
    Demany L; Semal C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1295-301. PubMed ID: 2708671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Limitations of first-order approximations for calculations using intensity jnd's.
    Hellman RP; Hellman WS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Nov; 80(5):1341-5. PubMed ID: 3782611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rate coding model for discrimination of simple tones in the presence of noise.
    Erell A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):204-14. PubMed ID: 3411049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the relation between the growth of loudness and the discrimination of intensity for pure tones.
    Hellman R; Scharf B; Teghtsoonian M; Teghtsoonian R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Aug; 82(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 3624649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss.
    Kummer P; Janssen T; Arnold W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jun; 103(6):3431-44. PubMed ID: 9637030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of flanking noise bands on the rate of growth of loudness of tones in normal and recruiting ears.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Hess RF; Birchall JP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Apr; 77(4):1505-13. PubMed ID: 3989105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency selectivity in patients with acoustic neuroma.
    Papsin BC; Abel SM; Nedzelski JM
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Sep; 104(9):1092-8. PubMed ID: 8072355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory intensity discrimination as a function of level-rove and tone duration in normal-hearing and impaired subjects: the "mid-level hump" revisited.
    Pienkowski M; Hagerman B
    Hear Res; 2009 Jul; 253(1-2):107-15. PubMed ID: 19345257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.