383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27541956)
1. A Judicial Perspective on Expert Testimony in Marijuana Driving Cases.
Celeste MA
J Med Toxicol; 2017 Mar; 13(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 27541956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marijuana in the Workplace: Guidance for Occupational Health Professionals and Employers: Joint Guidance Statement of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
Phillips JA; Holland MG; Baldwin DD; Gifford-Meuleveld L; Mueller KL; Perkison B; Upfal M; Dreger M
Workplace Health Saf; 2015 Apr; 63(4):139-64. PubMed ID: 25862727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Delays in DUI blood testing: Impact on cannabis DUI assessments.
Wood E; Brooks-Russell A; Drum P
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016; 17(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 26066003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
Klee CH; Friedman HJ
NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Driving Under the Influence of Cannabis: A Framework for Future Policy.
Chow RM; Marascalchi B; Abrams WB; Peiris NA; Odonkor CA; Cohen SP
Anesth Analg; 2019 Jun; 128(6):1300-1308. PubMed ID: 31094805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
Zlotnick J; Lin JR
Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential physiological and behavioral cues observed in individuals smoking botanical marijuana versus synthetic cannabinoid drugs.
Chase PB; Hawkins J; Mosier J; Jimenez E; Boesen K; Logan BK; Walter FG
Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2016; 54(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 26653952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The expert witness: understanding the rationale.
Brenner RJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Sep; 4(9):612-6. PubMed ID: 17845966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lessons from Canadian Courts for All Expert Witnesses.
Booth BD; Watts J; Dufour M
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Aug; 47(3):278-285. PubMed ID: 31097525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Expert witness testimony: rules of engagement.
Satiani B
Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2006; 40(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 16703210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The presentation of expert testimony via live audio-visual communication.
Miller RD
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1991; 19(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 2039847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deterring driving under the influence of cannabis.
Huestis MA
Addiction; 2015 Nov; 110(11):1697-8. PubMed ID: 26264558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cannabis and automobile driving].
Ménétrey A; Augsburger M; Giroud C; Mangin P
Praxis (Bern 1994); 2001 Aug; 90(34):1398-407. PubMed ID: 11552320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inconsistency in evidentiary standards for medical testimony: disorder in the courts.
Kassirer JP; Cecil JS
JAMA; 2002 Sep; 288(11):1382-7. PubMed ID: 12234232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Oral fluid testing for marijuana intoxication: enhancing objectivity for roadside DUI testing.
Doucette ML; Frattaroli S; Vernick JS
Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 24(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 28572268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].
Gkotsi GM; Moulin V; Gasser J
Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evolving legal standards for the admissibility of scientific evidence.
Black B
Science; 1988 Mar; 239(4847):1508-12. PubMed ID: 3281252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The admissibility of hypnotic evidence in U.S. Courts.
Giannelli PC
Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Apr; 43(2):212-33. PubMed ID: 7737764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ten years of judicial gatekeeping under Daubert.
Cecil JS
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S74-80. PubMed ID: 16030342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
