363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27542550)
1. Evaluation of the Transverse Displacement of the Proximal Segment After Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy With Different Lingual Split Patterns and Advancement Amounts Using the Finite Element Method.
Dai Z; Hou M; Ma W; Song DL; Zhang CX; Zhou WY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 74(11):2286.e1-2286.e11. PubMed ID: 27542550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Bone Fixation in Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Using Individual Models.
Tamura N; Takaki T; Takano N; Shibahara T
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2018; 59(2):67-78. PubMed ID: 29962423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement and its effect on relapse.
Angle AD; Rebellato J; Sheats RD
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 65(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 17174764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of mandibular setback via bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on transverse displacement of the proximal segment.
Choi HS; Rebellato J; Yoon HJ; Lund BA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 63(7):908-16. PubMed ID: 16003615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short- and long-term changes of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement in combination with Le Fort I osteotomy evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography.
Chen S; Lei J; Wang X; Fu KY; Farzad P; Yi B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1956-66. PubMed ID: 23973047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fixation Methods for Mandibular Advancement and Their Effects on Temporomandibular Joint: A Finite Element Analysis Study.
Demircan S; Uretürk EU; Apaydın A; Şen S
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():2810763. PubMed ID: 32185199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of the closing and opening muscle groups of jaw condyle biomechanics after mandible bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Xiangdong QI; Limin MA; Shizhen Z
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 40(6):e159-64. PubMed ID: 21907586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis.
Oguz Y; Uckan S; Ozden AU; Uckan E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 19615655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of bone contact area and intercondylar distance changes in orthognathic surgery - a comparison between BSSO and HSSO technique depending on mandibular displacement extent.
Möhlhenrich SC; Kniha K; Peters F; Heitzer M; Szalma J; Prescher A; Danesh G; Hölzle F; Modabber A
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Mar; 28(3):182. PubMed ID: 38424318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does fixation method affects temporomandibular joints after mandibular advancement?
Ureturk EU; Apaydin A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jun; 46(6):923-931. PubMed ID: 29724535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal osteotomy.
Becktor JP; Rebellato J; Becktor KB; Isaksson S; Vickers PD; Keller EE
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Apr; 60(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 11928096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D evaluation of the lingual fracture line after a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible.
Plooij JM; Naphausen MT; Maal TJ; Xi T; Rangel FA; Swennnen G; de Koning M; Borstlap WA; Bergé SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 38(12):1244-9. PubMed ID: 19713076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Part 1: advancement surgery-posterior loading.
Erkmen E; Simşek B; Yücel E; Kurt A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 16053877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical assessment of different fixation methods in mandibular high sagittal oblique osteotomy using a three-dimensional finite element analysis model.
Savoldelli C; Ehrmann E; Tillier Y
Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):8755. PubMed ID: 33888844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transverse stability of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback surgery.
Yoo JY; Kwon YD; Suh JH; Ko SJ; Lee B; Lee JW; Kim EC; Girod S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 42(8):994-1000. PubMed ID: 23538214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long term stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis.
Baas EM; Pijpe J; de Lange J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 22137334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of mandibular proximal segment rotations on skeletal relapse and condylar remodelling following bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomies.
Xi T; de Koning M; Bergé S; Hoppenreijs T; Maal T
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 43(9):1716-22. PubMed ID: 26321064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are there risk factors for osseous mandibular inferior border defects after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy?
Verweij JP; van Rijssel JG; Fiocco M; Mensink G; Gooris PJ; van Merkesteyn JP
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 45(2):192-197. PubMed ID: 28065728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of five different fixation techniques of sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite elements analysis.
Sato FR; Asprino L; Noritomi PY; da Silva JV; de Moraes M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Aug; 41(8):934-41. PubMed ID: 22510341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Skeletal stability after mandible bilateral sagittal split osteotomy - comparison of patient-specific implant and mini-plate fixation: A retrospective study.
Merta M; Kiukkonen A; Leikola J; Stoor P; Suojanen J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 Jan; 52(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 38129183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
