These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27542795)
1. Will ABSORB III change my practice? Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds for coronary artery disease. Cook S; Nef H; Capodanno D; Tamburino C; Baumbach A EuroIntervention; 2016 Aug; 12(6):801-4. PubMed ID: 27542795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomised comparison of a bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold with a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de novo native coronary artery lesions: the 2-year clinical outcomes of the ABSORB II trial. Chevalier B; Onuma Y; van Boven AJ; Piek JJ; Sabaté M; Helqvist S; Baumbach A; Smits PC; Kumar R; Wasungu L; Serruys PW EuroIntervention; 2016 Oct; 12(9):1102-1107. PubMed ID: 27564310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coronary artery aneurysms formation within Everolimus-eluting stents and bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. Lee WC; Chung WJ; Fang HY; Wu CJ Int J Cardiol; 2016 Mar; 206():58-60. PubMed ID: 26774833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Two-year clinical, angiographic, and serial optical coherence tomographic follow-up after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold and an everolimus-eluting metallic stent: insights from the randomised ABSORB Japan trial. Onuma Y; Sotomi Y; Shiomi H; Ozaki Y; Namiki A; Yasuda S; Ueno T; Ando K; Furuya J; Igarashi K; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Kusano H; Rapoza R; Popma JJ; Stone GW; Simonton C; Serruys PW; Kimura T EuroIntervention; 2016 Oct; 12(9):1090-1101. PubMed ID: 27597270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 2-year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold for treatment of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomised trials with an individual patient data substudy. Ali ZA; Serruys PW; Kimura T; Gao R; Ellis SG; Kereiakes DJ; Onuma Y; Simonton C; Zhang Z; Stone GW Lancet; 2017 Aug; 390(10096):760-772. PubMed ID: 28732815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 1-Year Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the GHOST-EU and XIENCE V USA Registries. Tamburino C; Capranzano P; Gori T; Latib A; Lesiak M; Nef H; Caramanno G; Naber C; Mehilli J; Di Mario C; Sabaté M; Münzel T; Colombo A; Araszkiewicz A; Wiebe J; Geraci S; Jensen C; Mattesini A; Brugaletta S; Capodanno D JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 9(5):440-9. PubMed ID: 26875648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is quantitative coronary angiography reliable in assessing the lumen gain after treatment with the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable polylactide scaffold? Sotomi Y; Onuma Y; Suwannasom P; Tateishi H; Tenekecioglu E; Zeng Y; Cavalcante R; Jonker H; Dijkstra J; Foin N; Koon JN; Collet C; de Winter RJ; Wykrzykowska JJ; Stone GW; Popma JJ; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Serruys PW; Kimura T EuroIntervention; 2016 Oct; 12(8):e998-e1008. PubMed ID: 27721215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Safety and efficacy of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stents assessed at 1-year follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies. Mukete BN; van der Heijden LC; Tandjung K; Baydoun H; Yadav K; Saleh QA; Doggen CJ; Abi Rafeh N; Le Jemtel TH; von Birgelen C Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():1087-94. PubMed ID: 27448538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold in patients with coronary artery disease: design of and rationale for the ABSORB III randomized trial. Kereiakes DJ; Ellis SG; Popma JJ; Fitzgerald PJ; Samady H; Jones-McMeans J; Zhang Z; Cheong WF; Su X; Ben-Yehuda O; Stone GW Am Heart J; 2015 Oct; 170(4):641-651.e3. PubMed ID: 26386787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Two-year clinical outcomes of the EVERBIO II trial. Arroyo D; Gendre G; Schukraft S; Kallinikou Z; Müller O; Baeriswyl G; Stauffer JC; Goy JJ; Togni M; Cook S; Puricel S Int J Cardiol; 2017 Sep; 243():121-125. PubMed ID: 28576627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Incidence and Potential Mechanism(s) of Post-Procedural Rise of Cardiac Biomarker in Patients With Coronary Artery Narrowing After Implantation of an Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold or Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent. Ishibashi Y; Muramatsu T; Nakatani S; Sotomi Y; Suwannasom P; Grundeken MJ; Cho YK; Garcia-Garcia HM; van Boven AJ; Piek JJ; Sabaté M; Helqvist S; Baumbach A; McClean D; de Sousa Almeida M; Wasungu L; Miquel-Hebert K; Dudek D; Chevalier B; Onuma Y; Serruys PW JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jul; 8(8):1053-1063. PubMed ID: 26205444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ABSORB II randomized controlled trial: a clinical evaluation to compare the safety, efficacy, and performance of the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold system against the XIENCE everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of subjects with ischemic heart disease caused by de novo native coronary artery lesions: rationale and study design. Diletti R; Serruys PW; Farooq V; Sudhir K; Dorange C; Miquel-Hebert K; Veldhof S; Rapoza R; Onuma Y; Garcia-Garcia HM; Chevalier B Am Heart J; 2012 Nov; 164(5):654-63. PubMed ID: 23137495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Outcomes After Implantation of Overlapping Bioresorbable Scaffolds vs New Generation Everolimus Eluting Stents. Panoulas VF; Kawamoto H; Sato K; Miyazaki T; Naganuma T; Sticchi A; Latib A; Colombo A Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2016 Dec; 69(12):1135-1143. PubMed ID: 27264490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Metallic Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB China Trial. Gao R; Yang Y; Han Y; Huo Y; Chen J; Yu B; Su X; Li L; Kuo HC; Ying SW; Cheong WF; Zhang Y; Su X; Xu B; Popma JJ; Stone GW; J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Dec; 66(21):2298-2309. PubMed ID: 26471805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. Puricel S; Arroyo D; Corpataux N; Baeriswyl G; Lehmann S; Kallinikou Z; Muller O; Allard L; Stauffer JC; Togni M; Goy JJ; Cook S J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Mar; 65(8):791-801. PubMed ID: 25720622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and intravascular imaging outcomes at 1 and 2 years after implantation of absorb everolimus eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in small vessels. Late lumen enlargement: does bioresorption matter with small vessel size? Insight from the ABSORB cohort B trial. Diletti R; Farooq V; Girasis C; Bourantas C; Onuma Y; Heo JH; Gogas BD; van Geuns RJ; Regar E; de Bruyne B; Dudek D; Thuesen L; Chevalier B; McClean D; Windecker S; Whitbourn RJ; Smits P; Koolen J; Meredith I; Li X; Miquel-Hebert K; Veldhof S; Garcia-Garcia HM; Ormiston JA; Serruys PW Heart; 2013 Jan; 99(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 23118346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of coronary artery disease: Clinical outcomes from randomized controlled trials. Rizik DG; Hermiller JB; Kereiakes DJ Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(S1):21-30. PubMed ID: 27797464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in routine clinical practice: early and midterm outcomes from the European multicentre GHOST-EU registry. Capodanno D; Gori T; Nef H; Latib A; Mehilli J; Lesiak M; Caramanno G; Naber C; Di Mario C; Colombo A; Capranzano P; Wiebe J; Araszkiewicz A; Geraci S; Pyxaras S; Mattesini A; Naganuma T; Münzel T; Tamburino C EuroIntervention; 2015 Feb; 10(10):1144-53. PubMed ID: 25042421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]