These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27542803)

  • 1. Control over the processing of the opponent's gaze direction in basketball experts.
    Weigelt M; Güldenpenning I; Steggemann-Weinrich Y; Alhaj Ahmad Alaboud M; Kunde W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):828-834. PubMed ID: 27542803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Processing head fakes in basketball: Are there ironic effects of instructions on the head-fake effect in basketball?
    Güldenpenning I; Weigelt M; Kunde W
    Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Oct; 67():102499. PubMed ID: 31326742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the head-fake effect in basketball robust against practice? Analyses of trial-by-trial adaptations, frequency distributions, and mixture effects to evaluate effects of practice.
    Güldenpenning I; Schütz C; Weigelt M; Kunde W
    Psychol Res; 2020 Apr; 84(3):823-833. PubMed ID: 30128660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trust my face: cognitive factors of head fakes in sports.
    Kunde W; Skirde S; Weigelt M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Jun; 17(2):110-27. PubMed ID: 21604910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cognitive load reduces interference by head fakes in basketball.
    Güldenpenning I; Kunde W; Weigelt M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Feb; 203():103013. PubMed ID: 31955031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A question of (perfect) timing: A preceding head turn increases the head-fake effect in basketball.
    Polzien A; Güldenpenning I; Weigelt M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251117. PubMed ID: 33979374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Context-specific adaptation for head fakes in basketball: a study on player-specific fake-frequency schedules.
    Güldenpenning I; Böer NT; Kunde W; Giesen CG; Rothermund K; Weigelt M
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jul; 88(5):1702-1711. PubMed ID: 38806734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shot deception in basketball: Gaze and anticipation strategy in defence.
    Meyer J; Smeeton NJ; Fasold F; Schul K; Schön T; Klatt S
    Hum Mov Sci; 2022 Aug; 84():102975. PubMed ID: 35820258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of visual perception in action anticipation in basketball athletes.
    Wu Y; Zeng Y; Zhang L; Wang S; Wang D; Tan X; Zhu X; Zhang J; Zhang J
    Neuroscience; 2013 May; 237():29-41. PubMed ID: 23384606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gaze behavior in basketball shooting: further evidence for online visual control.
    de Oliveira RF; Oudejans RR; Beek PJ
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2008 Sep; 79(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 18816952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeating head fakes in basketball: Temporal aspects affect the congruency sequence effect and the size of the head-fake effect.
    Polzien A; Güldenpenning I; Weigelt M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2023 Jun; 29(2):292-301. PubMed ID: 35511551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examining the Perceptual-Cognitive Mechanism of Deceptive Actions in Sports.
    Polzien A; Güldenpenning I; Weigelt M
    Exp Psychol; 2020 Nov; 67(6):349-363. PubMed ID: 33661040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of sport expertise and shot results on basketball players' action anticipation.
    Li Y; Feng T
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227521. PubMed ID: 31905223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A psychometric evaluation of the Group Environment Questionnaire in a sample of professional basketball and soccer players.
    Steca P; Pala AN; Greco A; Monzani D; D'Addario M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Feb; 116(1):262-71. PubMed ID: 23829152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detecting deception in a bluffing body: the role of expertise.
    Sebanz N; Shiffrar M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):170-5. PubMed ID: 19145029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acceptance of gamesmanship and cheating in young competitive athletes in relation to the motivational climate generated by parents and coaches.
    Palou P; Ponseti FJ; Cruz J; Vidal J; Cantallops J; Borràs PA; Garcia-Mas A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2013 Aug; 117(1):1332-45. PubMed ID: 24422357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Especial skill vs. quiet eye duration in basketball free throw: Evidence for the inhibition of competing task solutions.
    Klostermann A
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2019 Aug; 19(7):964-971. PubMed ID: 30724705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Defender's Vision-Gaze Behavior of One-on-One Defenders in Basketball.
    Meyer J; Fasold F; Schul K; Sonnenschein M; Klatt S
    J Sport Exerc Psychol; 2022 Apr; 44(2):127-137. PubMed ID: 35245894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance as a function of shooting style in basketball players under 11 years of age.
    Arias JL
    Percept Mot Skills; 2012 Apr; 114(2):446-56. PubMed ID: 22755449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sport-specific decision-making in a Go/NoGo reaction task: difference among nonathletes and baseball and basketball players.
    Nakamoto H; Mori S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Feb; 106(1):163-70. PubMed ID: 18459365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.