244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27543620)
1. Comparison of Collection Methods for Fecal Samples for Discovery Metabolomics in Epidemiologic Studies.
Loftfield E; Vogtmann E; Sampson JN; Moore SC; Nelson H; Knight R; Chia N; Sinha R
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2016 Nov; 25(11):1483-1490. PubMed ID: 27543620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods on Variation in Gut Metagenomics and Untargeted Metabolomics.
Guan H; Pu Y; Liu C; Lou T; Tan S; Kong M; Sun Z; Mei Z; Qi Q; Quan Z; Zhao G; Zheng Y
mSphere; 2021 Oct; 6(5):e0063621. PubMed ID: 34523982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiota Studies in Bangladesh.
Vogtmann E; Chen J; Kibriya MG; Chen Y; Islam T; Eunes M; Ahmed A; Naher J; Rahman A; Amir A; Shi J; Abnet CC; Nelson H; Knight R; Chia N; Ahsan H; Sinha R
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 May; 83(10):. PubMed ID: 28258145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Methods To Collect Fecal Samples for Microbiome Studies Using Whole-Genome Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing.
Byrd DA; Sinha R; Hoffman KL; Chen J; Hua X; Shi J; Chia N; Petrosino J; Vogtmann E
mSphere; 2020 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 32250964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Fecal Collection Methods for Microbiome and Metabolomics Studies.
Wang Z; Zolnik CP; Qiu Y; Usyk M; Wang T; Strickler HD; Isasi CR; Kaplan RC; Kurland IJ; Qi Q; Burk RD
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2018; 8():301. PubMed ID: 30234027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility, stability, and accuracy of microbial profiles by fecal sample collection method in three distinct populations.
Byrd DA; Chen J; Vogtmann E; Hullings A; Song SJ; Amir A; Kibriya MG; Ahsan H; Chen Y; Nelson H; Knight R; Shi J; Chia N; Sinha R
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224757. PubMed ID: 31738775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of fecal and oral collection methods for studies of the human microbiota in two Iranian cohorts.
Wu Z; Hullings AG; Ghanbari R; Etemadi A; Wan Y; Zhu B; Poustchi H; Fahraji BB; Sakhvidi MJZ; Shi J; Knight R; Malekzadeh R; Sinha R; Vogtmann E
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):324. PubMed ID: 34809575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.
Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK
Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Collection Methods for Fecal Samples in Microbiome Studies.
Vogtmann E; Chen J; Amir A; Shi J; Abnet CC; Nelson H; Knight R; Chia N; Sinha R
Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 185(2):115-123. PubMed ID: 27986704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Fecal Sample Collection Methods for Microbial Analysis Embedded within Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs.
Zouiouich S; Mariadassou M; Rué O; Vogtmann E; Huybrechts I; Severi G; Boutron-Ruault MC; Senore C; Naccarati A; Mengozzi G; Kozlakidis Z; Jenab M; Sinha R; Gunter MJ; Leclerc M
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2022 Feb; 31(2):305-314. PubMed ID: 34782392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants.
Ramamoorthy S; Levy S; Mohamed M; Abdelghani A; Evans AM; Miller LAD; Mehta L; Moore S; Freinkman E; Hourigan SK
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):59. PubMed ID: 33618670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Collecting Fecal Samples for Microbiome Analyses in Epidemiology Studies.
Sinha R; Chen J; Amir A; Vogtmann E; Shi J; Inman KS; Flores R; Sampson J; Knight R; Chia N
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2016 Feb; 25(2):407-16. PubMed ID: 26604270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Metabolomics and Microbiome Analysis of Ethanol versus OMNImet/gene•GUT Fecal Stabilization.
Isokääntä H; Pinto da Silva L; Karu N; Kallonen T; Aatsinki AK; Hankemeier T; Schimmel L; Diaz E; Hyötyläinen T; Dorrestein PC; Knight R; Orešič M; Kaddurah-Daouk R; Dickens AM; Lamichhane S
Anal Chem; 2024 Jun; 96(22):8893-8904. PubMed ID: 38782403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability of the Fecal and Oral Microbiome over 2 Years at -80°C for Multiple Collection Methods.
Zouiouich S; Byrd DA; Hua X; Karwa S; Wan Y; Shi J; Humphrey GC; Ackermann GL; Knight R; Abnet CC; Vogtmann E; Sinha R
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2023 Mar; 32(3):444-451. PubMed ID: 36649143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2009; 9(10):1-40. PubMed ID: 23074514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fresh vs Frozen Samples and Ambient Temperature Have Little Effect on Detection of Colorectal Cancer or Adenomas by a Fecal Immunochemical Test in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Cohort in Germany.
Chen H; Werner S; Brenner H
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2017 Oct; 15(10):1547-1556.e5. PubMed ID: 27793749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of Stool Sample Preservation Methods on Gut Microbiota Biodiversity: New Original Data and Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Li XM; Shi X; Yao Y; Shen YC; Wu XL; Cai T; Liang LX; Wang F
Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Jun; 11(3):e0429722. PubMed ID: 37093040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of post-collection freezing delay on the reliability of serum metabolomics in samples reflecting the California mid-term pregnancy biobank.
La Frano MR; Carmichael SL; Ma C; Hardley M; Shen T; Wong R; Rosales L; Borkowski K; Pedersen TL; Shaw GM; Stevenson DK; Fiehn O; Newman JW
Metabolomics; 2018 Nov; 14(11):151. PubMed ID: 30830400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sample treatment optimization for fish stool metabolomics.
Hano T; Ito M; Ito K; Uchida M
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2018 Aug; 1092():258-267. PubMed ID: 29913338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Describing the fecal metabolome in cryogenically collected samples from healthy participants.
Trošt K; Ahonen L; Suvitaival T; Christiansen N; Nielsen T; Thiele M; Jacobsen S; Krag A; Rossing P; Hansen T; Dragsted LO; Legido-Quigley C
Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):885. PubMed ID: 31965056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
