362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27543983)
1. Impact of Implementing the Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology in the Performance of Urine Cytology: A Correlative Study of 124 Cases.
Hassan M; Solanki S; Kassouf W; Kanber Y; Caglar D; Auger M; Brimo F
Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Sep; 146(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 27543983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementing The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology results in a decrease in the rate of the "atypical" category and an increase in its prediction of subsequent high-grade urothelial carcinoma.
Wang Y; Auger M; Kanber Y; Caglar D; Brimo F
Cancer Cytopathol; 2018 Mar; 126(3):207-214. PubMed ID: 29278461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An institutional experience with The Paris System: A paradigm shift from ambiguous terminology to more objective criteria for reporting urine cytology.
Roy M; Kaushal S; Jain D; Seth A; Iyer VK; Mathur SR
Cytopathology; 2017 Dec; 28(6):509-515. PubMed ID: 28833848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Atypical Category of the Johns Hopkins Template Has Higher Risk of Malignancy than the Paris System but the Paris System Is More Applicable for Suspicious Category.
Celik B; Kavas G
Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(4):425-433. PubMed ID: 36731438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cytologic evaluation of upper urinary tract specimens: An institutional retrospective study using The Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology second edition with histopathologic follow-up.
Khajir G; Sun T; Wang H; Sprenkle PC; Adeniran AJ; Cai G; Levi AW
Cytopathology; 2024 Mar; 35(2):235-241. PubMed ID: 37916579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital image analysis supports a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio cutoff value below 0.7 for positive for high-grade urothelial carcinoma and suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology specimens.
McIntire PJ; Snow JT; Elsoukkary SS; Soong L; Sweeney J; Robinson BD; Siddiqui MT
Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Feb; 127(2):120-124. PubMed ID: 30395388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The application of the Johns Hopkins Hospital Template on urine cytology.
Wu HH; Redelman M; Chen S; Grignon DJ; Cramer HM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Aug; 43(8):593-7. PubMed ID: 25721938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of the Paris Reporting System for Urine Cytology: The Three-Year Experience of a Single Tertiary Care Institute in Thailand.
Phruttinarakorn B; Plumworasawat S; Kayankarnnavee J; Lualon J; Pongtippan A
Acta Cytol; 2022; 66(2):134-141. PubMed ID: 34999581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cytohistological correlation of urine cytology in a tertiary centre with application of the Paris system.
Rohilla M; Singh P; Rajwanshi A; Gupta N; Srinivasan R; Dey P; Kakkar N
Cytopathology; 2018 Oct; 29(5):436-443. PubMed ID: 29920811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical follow up and the impact of the Paris system in the assessment of patients with atypical urine cytology.
Northrup V; Acar BC; Hossain M; Acker MR; Manuel E; Rahmeh T
Diagn Cytopathol; 2018 Dec; 46(12):1022-1030. PubMed ID: 30375194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Paris System for urine cytology in upper tract urothelial specimens: A comparative analysis with biopsy and surgical resection.
Zheng X; Si Q; Du D; Harshan M; Zhang Z; Haines K; Shi W; Chhieng DC
Cytopathology; 2018 Apr; 29(2):184-188. PubMed ID: 29251368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implementation of The Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology improves diagnostic accuracy of selective upper urinary tract cytology.
Miyai K; Nakayama M; Minabe S; Ogata S; Ito K; Matsukuma S
Cancer Cytopathol; 2024 Apr; 132(4):242-249. PubMed ID: 38294961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of urine cytology diagnostic reports before and after the implementation of the Paris System classification system in China.
Ma C; Zhang L
Cytopathology; 2020 Sep; 31(5):457-462. PubMed ID: 32246545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of The Paris System to atypical urine cytology samples: correlation with histology and UroVysion
Miki Y; Neat M; Chandra A
Cytopathology; 2017 Apr; 28(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 27601215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Paris System for reporting urinary cytology in daily practice with emphasis on ancillary testing by multiprobe FISH.
Vlajnic T; Gut A; Savic S; Bubendorf L
J Clin Pathol; 2020 Feb; 73(2):90-95. PubMed ID: 31467041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Split-sample comparison of urothelial cells in ThinPrep and cytospin preparations in urinary cytology: Do we need to adjust The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology criteria?
Richardson CJ; Pambuccian SE; Barkan GA
Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Feb; 128(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 31774630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Paris System in atypical urinary cytology.
Mikou P; Lenos M; Papaioannou D; Vrettou K; Trigka EA; Sousouris S; Constantinides C
Cytopathology; 2018 Dec; 29(6):545-549. PubMed ID: 30066427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experience on the use of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytopathology: review of the published literature.
Pastorello RG; Barkan GA; Saieg M
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 33160893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The predictive value of positive and suspicious urine cytology: Are they different?
Kuan KC; Segura SE; Ahlstedt J; Khader SN; Hakima L
Diagn Cytopathol; 2020 Nov; 48(11):998-1002. PubMed ID: 32558388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Modified Direct-Smear Processing Technique Employing Two-Step Centrifugation/Fixation Is Useful for Detecting High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma.
Toyonaga Y; Yamazaki K; Koyama Y; Yamada M; Ishida Y
Acta Cytol; 2017; 61(6):447-454. PubMed ID: 28954257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
