216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27544248)
1. Use of Bayesian Belief Network techniques to explore the interaction of biosecurity practices on the probability of porcine disease occurrence in Canada.
Cox R; Revie CW; Hurnik D; Sanchez J
Prev Vet Med; 2016 Sep; 131():20-30. PubMed ID: 27544248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of biosecurity practices and development of a scoring system in swine farms using item response theory.
Silva GS; Leotti VB; Castro SMJ; Medeiros AAR; Silva APSP; Linhares DCL; Corbellini LG
Prev Vet Med; 2019 Jun; 167():128-136. PubMed ID: 31027714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simulation of between-farm transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in Ontario, Canada using the North American Animal Disease Spread Model.
Thakur KK; Revie CW; Hurnik D; Poljak Z; Sanchez J
Prev Vet Med; 2015 Mar; 118(4):413-26. PubMed ID: 25636969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and validation of a scoring system to assess the relative vulnerability of swine breeding herds to the introduction of PRRS virus.
Silva GS; Corbellini LG; Linhares DLC; Baker KL; Holtkamp DJ
Prev Vet Med; 2018 Nov; 160():116-122. PubMed ID: 30388993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamics of Virus Distribution in a Defined Swine Production Network Using Enteric Viruses as Molecular Markers.
Lachapelle V; Letellier A; Fravalo P; Brassard J; L'Homme Y
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 83(4):. PubMed ID: 27940545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of a biosecurity assessment tool and the assessment of biosecurity levels by this tool on Japanese commercial swine farms.
Sasaki Y; Furutani A; Furuichi T; Hayakawa Y; Ishizeki S; Kano R; Koike F; Miyashita M; Mizukami Y; Watanabe Y; Otake S;
Prev Vet Med; 2020 Feb; 175():104848. PubMed ID: 31786401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A descriptive study of on-farm biosecurity and management practices during the incursion of porcine epidemic diarrhea into Canadian swine herds, 2014.
Perri AM; Poljak Z; Dewey C; Harding JC; O'Sullivan TL
J Vet Sci; 2020 Mar; 21(2):e25. PubMed ID: 32233133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interpretable machine learning applied to on-farm biosecurity and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.
Sykes AL; Silva GS; Holtkamp DJ; Mauch BW; Osemeke O; Linhares DCL; Machado G
Transbound Emerg Dis; 2022 Jul; 69(4):e916-e930. PubMed ID: 34719136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contacts posing risks of disease introduction in swine breeding herds in Quebec, Canada: Is the frequency of contacts associated with biosecurity measures?
Lambert MÈ; Arsenault J; Côté JC; D'Allaire S
Prev Vet Med; 2023 Aug; 217():105966. PubMed ID: 37423151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On-farm characteristics and biosecurity protocols for small-scale swine producers in eastern Australia.
Schembri N; Hernandez-Jover M; Toribio JA; Holyoake PK
Prev Vet Med; 2015 Jan; 118(1):104-16. PubMed ID: 25433716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Expert Opinion on the Perceived Effectiveness and Importance of On-Farm Biosecurity Measures for Cattle and Swine Farms in Switzerland.
Kuster K; Cousin ME; Jemmi T; Schüpbach-Regula G; Magouras I
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144533. PubMed ID: 26656893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of external biosecurity practices on southern Ontario sow farms.
Bottoms K; Poljak Z; Dewey C; Deardon R; Holtkamp D; Friendship R
Prev Vet Med; 2013 Apr; 109(1-2):58-68. PubMed ID: 22974771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of a risk assessment tool for improving biosecurity on pig farms.
Allepuz A; Martín-Valls GE; Casal J; Mateu E
Prev Vet Med; 2018 May; 153():56-63. PubMed ID: 29653735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effective biosecurity to protect North American studs and clients from emerging infectious disease.
Reicks DL
Theriogenology; 2019 Oct; 137():82-87. PubMed ID: 31285050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Brucella suis and farm biosecurity: assessing risk in pigs raised outdoors in New York State.
Havas KA; Yancey CB; Zhuang J; Braun C; Smith DC
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2022 May; 260(S2):S87-S94. PubMed ID: 35290201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring the role of small-scale livestock keepers for national biosecurity-The pig case.
Correia-Gomes C; Henry MK; Auty HK; Gunn GJ
Prev Vet Med; 2017 Sep; 145():7-15. PubMed ID: 28903877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk assessment as a tool for improving external biosecurity at farm level.
Sternberg Lewerin S; Österberg J; Alenius S; Elvander M; Fellström C; Tråvén M; Wallgren P; Waller KP; Jacobson M
BMC Vet Res; 2015 Jul; 11():171. PubMed ID: 26215281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biosecurity assessment of Argentinian pig farms.
Alarcón LV; Monterubbianesi M; Perelman S; Sanguinetti HR; Perfumo CJ; Mateu E; Allepuz A
Prev Vet Med; 2019 Oct; 170():104637. PubMed ID: 31421498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Management and biosecurity practices on pig farms in the Western Highlands of Cameroon (Central Africa).
Kouam MK; Jacouba M; Moussala JO
Vet Med Sci; 2020 Feb; 6(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 31682081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Probability of Rhipicephalus microplus introduction into farms by cattle movement using a Bayesian Belief Network.
Miraballes C; Riet-Correa F; Saporiti T; Lara S; Parodi P; Sanchez J
Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2019 Jun; 10(4):883-893. PubMed ID: 31023630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
