955 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27544827)
1. Venous cutdown versus the Seldinger technique for placement of totally implantable venous access ports.
Hsu CC; Kwan GN; Evans-Barns H; Rophael JA; van Driel ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 2016(8):CD008942. PubMed ID: 27544827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for internal jugular vein catheterization.
Brass P; Hellmich M; Kolodziej L; Schick G; Smith AF
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jan; 1(1):CD006962. PubMed ID: 25575244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization.
Brass P; Hellmich M; Kolodziej L; Schick G; Smith AF
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jan; 1(1):CD011447. PubMed ID: 25575245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Closed cannulation of subclavian vein vs open cut-down of cephalic vein for totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) implantation: protocol for a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of perioperative and postoperative complications.
Klaiber U; Grummich K; Jensen K; Saure D; Contin P; Hüttner FJ; Diener MK; Knebel P
Syst Rev; 2015 Apr; 4():53. PubMed ID: 25896394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized clinical trial comparing venous cutdown with the Seldinger technique for placement of implantable venous access ports.
Nocito A; Wildi S; Rufibach K; Clavien PA; Weber M
Br J Surg; 2009 Oct; 96(10):1129-34. PubMed ID: 19731229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous subclavian vein puncture versus surgical venous cutdown for the insertion of a totally implantable venous access device.
Orci LA; Meier RP; Morel P; Staszewicz W; Toso C
Br J Surg; 2014 Jan; 101(2):8-16. PubMed ID: 24276950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Frequency of pneumothorax and haemothorax after primary open versus closed implantation strategies for insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in oncological patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Hüttner FJ; Bruckner T; Alldinger I; Hennes R; Ulrich A; Büchler MW; Diener MK; Knebel P
Trials; 2015 Mar; 16():128. PubMed ID: 25872780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Central venous access sites for the prevention of venous thrombosis, stenosis and infection.
Ge X; Cavallazzi R; Li C; Pan SM; Wang YW; Wang FL
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Mar; 2012(3):CD004084. PubMed ID: 22419292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Prospective, Comparative Evaluation on Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices by External Jugular Vein
Iorio O; Gazzanelli S; D'Ermo G; Pezzolla A; Gurrado A; Testini M; De Toma G; Cavallaro G
Am Surg; 2018 Jun; 84(6):841-843. PubMed ID: 29981612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Totally implantable venous access port insertion via open Seldinger approach of the internal jugular vein-a retrospective risk stratification of 500 consecutive patients.
Becker F; Wurche LA; Darscht M; Pascher A; Struecker B
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 May; 406(3):903-910. PubMed ID: 33550438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cutdowns for totally implantable access ports to central veins.
Kulaylat M; Karakousis CP
Vascular; 2009; 17(5):273-6. PubMed ID: 19769807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Central venous access sites for the prevention of venous thrombosis, stenosis and infection in patients requiring long-term intravenous therapy.
Hamilton HC; Foxcroft DR
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jul; (3):CD004084. PubMed ID: 17636746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cephalic Vein Cut-Down Method for Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports: A Single-Institution Experience.
Hataoka T; Sanmoto Y; Kinuta S
Ann Vasc Surg; 2024 Jan; 98():244-250. PubMed ID: 37356657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial.
Biffi R; Orsi F; Pozzi S; Pace U; Bonomo G; Monfardini L; Della Vigna P; Rotmensz N; Radice D; Zampino MG; Fazio N; de Braud F; Andreoni B; Goldhirsch A
Ann Oncol; 2009 May; 20(5):935-40. PubMed ID: 19179550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low incidence of complications after cephalic vein cutdown for pacemaker lead implantation in children weighing less than 10 kilograms: A single-center experience with long-term follow-up.
Kircanski B; Vasic D; Savic D; Stojanov P
Heart Rhythm; 2015 Aug; 12(8):1820-6. PubMed ID: 25916570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound-based prediction of cephalic vein cutdown success prior to totally implantable venous access device placement.
Staszewicz W; Naiken SP; Mennet A; Meyer J; Righini M; Morel P; Toso C
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2019 Nov; 7(6):865-869.e1. PubMed ID: 31495770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Totally implantable venous access ports: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing subclavian and internal jugular vein punctures.
Zhou Y; Lan Y; Zhang Q; Song J; He J; Peng N; Peng X; Yang X
Phlebology; 2022 May; 37(4):279-288. PubMed ID: 35200052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meta-analysis of primary open versus closed cannulation strategy for totally implantable venous access port implantation.
Klaiber U; Probst P; Hackbusch M; Jensen K; Dörr-Harim C; Hüttner FJ; Hackert T; Diener MK; Büchler MW; Knebel P
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 May; 406(3):587-596. PubMed ID: 33420832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Venous access and long-term pacemaker lead failure: comparing contrast-guided axillary vein puncture with subclavian puncture and cephalic cutdown.
Chan NY; Kwong NP; Cheong AP
Europace; 2017 Jul; 19(7):1193-1197. PubMed ID: 27733455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Totally implantable venous access systems. Analysis of complications].
D'Angelo F; Ramacciato G; Caramitti A; Aurello P; Lauro S; Bordin F; Della Casa U
Minerva Chir; 1997; 52(7-8):937-42. PubMed ID: 9411296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
