350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27545573)
1. Impact of Surgeon Case Volume on Reoperation Rates after Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Surgery.
Onyeji IC; Sui W; Pagano MJ; Weinberg AC; James MB; Theofanides MC; Stember DS; Anderson CB; Stahl PJ
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):223-229. PubMed ID: 27545573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in Penile Prosthetics: Influence of Patient Demographics, Surgeon Volume, and Hospital Volume on Type of Penile Prosthesis Inserted in New York State.
Kashanian JA; Golan R; Sun T; Patel NA; Lipsky MJ; Stahl PJ; Sedrakyan A
J Sex Med; 2018 Feb; 15(2):245-250. PubMed ID: 29292061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Contemporary Analysis of Dual Inflatable Penile Prosthesis and Artificial Urinary Sphincter Outcomes.
Patel N; Golan R; Halpern JA; Sun T; Asafu-Adjei AD; Chughtai B; Stahl P; Sedrakyan A; Kashanian JA
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):141-146. PubMed ID: 30059687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term infection outcomes after original antibiotic impregnated inflatable penile prosthesis implants: up to 7.7 years of followup.
Carson CC; Mulcahy JJ; Harsch MR
J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):614-8. PubMed ID: 21168870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A population-based analysis of contemporary rates of reoperation for penile prosthesis procedures.
Grewal S; Vetter J; Brandes SB; Strope SA
Urology; 2014 Jul; 84(1):112-6. PubMed ID: 24785986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors influencing the outcomes of penile prosthesis surgery at a teaching institution.
Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; McConnell JD; Hendin BN
Urology; 2003 Nov; 62(5):918-21. PubMed ID: 14624920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of Pelvic Radiation Therapy on Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Reoperation Rates.
Golan R; Patel NA; Sun T; Barbieri CE; Sedrakyan A; Kashanian JA
J Sex Med; 2018 Nov; 15(11):1653-1658. PubMed ID: 30415817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Active Polysubstance Abuse Concurrent With Surgery as a Possible Newly Identified Infection Risk Factor in Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Based on a Retrospective Analysis of Health and Socioeconomic Factors.
Balen A; Gross MS; Phillips EA; Henry GD; Munarriz R
J Sex Med; 2016 Apr; 13(4):697-701. PubMed ID: 26928774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Emerging Complications Following Alternative Reservoir Placement during Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement: A 5-Year Multi-Institutional Experience.
Hernández JC; Trost L; Köhler T; Ring J; Traweek R; Alom M; Wang R
J Urol; 2019 Mar; 201(3):581-586. PubMed ID: 30366022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reoperation Rates for Penile Prosthetic Surgery.
Mirheydar H; Zhou T; Chang DC; Hsieh TC
J Sex Med; 2016 Jan; 13(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 26755095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immune Deficiency Does Not Increase Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Reoperation Rates.
Gaffney CD; Fainberg J; Punjani N; Aboukhshaba A; Pierce H; Patel N; Zheng X; Sun T; Sedrakyan A; Kashanian JA
J Sex Med; 2021 Aug; 18(8):1427-1433. PubMed ID: 34303632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Infection following penile prosthesis placement at an academic training center remains low despite involvement of surgeons-in-training.
McAbee KE; Pearlman AM; Terlecki RP
Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Sep; 59(5):342-347. PubMed ID: 30182080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does surgical approach affect the incidence of inflatable penile prosthesis infection?
Garber BB; Marcus SM
Urology; 1998 Aug; 52(2):291-3. PubMed ID: 9697797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trends in penile prosthesis implantation and analysis of predictive factors for removal.
Li K; Brandes ER; Chang SL; Leow JJ; Chung BI; Wang Y; Eswara JR
World J Urol; 2019 Apr; 37(4):639-646. PubMed ID: 30251052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of inflatable penile prosthesis insertion in 247 patients completing female to male gender reassignment surgery.
Falcone M; Garaffa G; Gillo A; Dente D; Christopher AN; Ralph DJ
BJU Int; 2018 Jan; 121(1):139-144. PubMed ID: 28940910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Indications for Penile Prosthesis Revision: Lessons Learned to Limit Technical Causes of Reoperation.
Chan EP; Punjani N; Campbell JD; Abed H; Brock G
J Sex Med; 2019 Sep; 16(9):1444-1450. PubMed ID: 31303570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multi-institutional outcome study on the efficacy of closed-suction drainage of the scrotum in three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery.
Sadeghi-Nejad H; Ilbeigi P; Wilson SK; Delk JR; Siegel A; Seftel AD; Shannon L; Jung H
Int J Impot Res; 2005; 17(6):535-8. PubMed ID: 15988544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Delayed postoperative hematoma formation after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.
Garber BB; Bickell M
J Sex Med; 2015 Jan; 12(1):265-9. PubMed ID: 25349141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined inflatable penile prosthesis-artificial urinary sphincter implantation: no increased risk of adverse events compared to single or staged device implantation.
Segal RL; Cabrini MR; Harris ED; Mostwin JL; Bivalacqua TJ; Burnett AL
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2183-8. PubMed ID: 23831315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Malleable Implant Salvage Technique: Infection Outcomes after Mulcahy Salvage Procedure and Replacement of Infected Inflatable Penile Prosthesis with Malleable Prosthesis.
Gross MS; Phillips EA; Balen A; Eid JF; Yang C; Simon R; Martinez D; Carrion R; Perito P; Levine L; Greenfield J; Munarriz R
J Urol; 2016 Mar; 195(3):694-7. PubMed ID: 26343986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
