309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27546014)
21. Positive Nipple Margin After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: An Alternative and Oncologically Safe Approach to Preserving the Nipple-Areolar Complex.
Haslinger ML; Sosin M; Bartholomew AJ; Crocker A; Gulla A; Willey SC; Pittman TA; Tousimis EA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Aug; 25(8):2303-2307. PubMed ID: 29905891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The role of specimen radiography in breast-conserving therapy of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Lange M; Reimer T; Hartmann S; Glass Ä; Stachs A
Breast; 2016 Apr; 26():73-9. PubMed ID: 27017245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Extent of ductal carcinoma in situ according to breast cancer subtypes: a population-based cohort study.
Doebar SC; van den Broek EC; Koppert LB; Jager A; Baaijens MHA; Obdeijn IAM; van Deurzen CHM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jul; 158(1):179-187. PubMed ID: 27318854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of Cavity Shave Margins on Margin Status in Patients with Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.
Howard-McNatt M; Dupont E; Tsangaris T; Garcia-Cantu C; Chiba A; Berger AC; Levine EA; Gass JS; Ollila DW; Chagpar AB;
J Am Coll Surg; 2021 Apr; 232(4):373-378. PubMed ID: 33346081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Neuschatz AC; DiPetrillo T; Steinhoff M; Safaii H; Yunes M; Landa M; Chung M; Cady B; Wazer DE
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(7):1917-24. PubMed ID: 11932892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ductal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy margins.
Dzierzanowski M; Melville KA; Barnes PJ; MacIntosh RF; Caines JS; Porter GA
J Surg Oncol; 2005 May; 90(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 15844190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors Associated With Positive Margins in Women Undergoing Breast Conservation Surgery.
Murphy BL; Boughey JC; Keeney MG; Glasgow AE; Racz JM; Keeney GL; Habermann EB
Mayo Clin Proc; 2018 Apr; 93(4):429-435. PubMed ID: 29439832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Positive Nipple Margins in Nipple-Sparing Mastectomies: Rates, Management, and Oncologic Safety.
Tang R; Coopey SB; Merrill AL; Rai U; Specht MC; Gadd MA; Colwell AS; Austen WG; Brachtel EF; Smith BL
J Am Coll Surg; 2016 Jun; 222(6):1149-55. PubMed ID: 27118712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Management of positive sub-areolar/nipple duct margins in nipple-sparing mastectomies.
Camp MS; Coopey SB; Tang R; Colwell A; Specht M; Greenup RA; Gadd MA; Brachtel E; Austen WG; Smith BL
Breast J; 2014; 20(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 24890641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery between ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.
Choi YJ; Shin YD; Song YJ
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 14():126. PubMed ID: 27122132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Does intra-operative margin assessment improve margin status and re-excision rates? A population-based analysis of outcomes in breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Laws A; Brar MS; Bouchard-Fortier A; Leong B; Quan ML
J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 118(7):1205-1211. PubMed ID: 30293241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Location and extent of positive resection margins and ductal carcinoma in situ in lumpectomy specimens of ductal breast carcinoma examined with a microscopic three-dimensional view.
Mai KT; Perkins DG; Mirsky D
Breast J; 2003; 9(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 12558668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prevalence of terminal duct lobular units and frequency of neoplastic involvement of the nipple in mastectomy.
Kryvenko ON; Yoon JY; Chitale DA; Lee MW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Jul; 137(7):955-60. PubMed ID: 23808467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Multiple re-excisions versus mastectomy in patients with persistent residual disease following breast conservation surgery.
Cellini C; Huston TL; Martins D; Christos P; Carson J; Kemper S; Simmons RM
Am J Surg; 2005 Jun; 189(6):662-6. PubMed ID: 15910716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative analysis of margin status in breast conservation surgery and its correlation with subsequent re-excision findings.
Krishnamurthy K; Febres-Aldana CA; Alghamdi S; Mesko T; Paramo J; Poppiti RJ
Pathologica; 2019 Mar; 111(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 31217620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluating the relationship between ductal carcinoma in situ, calcifications, and margin status in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery.
Bruenderman EH; Bhutiani N; Mercer MK; McMasters KM; Sanders MAG; Ajkay NL
J Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 119(6):694-699. PubMed ID: 30742316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of systematic cavity shave margins in breast-conserving surgery at a large community hospital with a low baseline re-excision rate.
Vetter C; Ashok A; Perez M; Musaad S; Rahimi G; Gohil K; Higham A
Breast J; 2020 Oct; 26(10):1960-1965. PubMed ID: 33078470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Margin width is not predictive of residual disease on re-excision in breast conserving therapy.
Hadzikadic Gusic L; McGuire KP; Ozmen T; Soran A; Thomas CR; McAuliffe PF; Diego EJ; Bonaventura M; Johnson RR; Ahrendt GM
J Surg Oncol; 2014 Apr; 109(5):426-30. PubMed ID: 24338603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Management of ductal carcinoma in situ with nipple discharge. Intraductal spreading of carcinoma is an unfavorable pathologic factor for breast-conserving surgery.
Ohuchi N; Furuta A; Mori S
Cancer; 1994 Aug; 74(4):1294-302. PubMed ID: 8055451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinicopathological Predictors of Positive Resection Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Chauhan H; Jiwa N; Nagarajan VR; Thiruchelvam P; Hogben K; Al-Mufti R; Hadjiminas D; Shousha S; Cutress R; Ashrafian H; Takats Z; Leff DR
Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):3939-3947. PubMed ID: 38520579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
