These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27546015)

  • 21. Laparoscopic compared with open radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer.
    Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 119(6):1201-9. PubMed ID: 22617585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancer.
    Wang YZ; Deng L; Xu HC; Zhang Y; Liang ZQ
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Nov; 15():928. PubMed ID: 26596955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
    Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Concurrent Learning Curves of 3-Dimensional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Using 2-Dimensional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy as a Benchmark: A Single Surgeon's Experience.
    Ding D; Jiang H; Nie J; Liu X; Guo SW
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 Aug; 25():5903-5919. PubMed ID: 31392971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial and cervical cancers: a systematic review.
    Nevis IF; Vali B; Higgins C; Dhalla I; Urbach D; Bernardini MQ
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 27424111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study.
    Kim TH; Choi CH; Choi JK; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1466-73. PubMed ID: 25207462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
    Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Protective operative techniques in radical hysterectomy in early cervical carcinoma and their influence on disease-free and overall survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk groups.
    Kampers J; Gerhardt E; Sibbertsen P; Flock T; Klapdor R; Hertel H; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Sep; 304(3):577-587. PubMed ID: 34021804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Jin YM; Liu SS; Chen J; Chen YN; Ren CC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193033. PubMed ID: 29554090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Implementation of laparoscopic approach for type B radical hysterectomy: a comparison with open surgical operations.
    Ditto A; Martinelli F; Bogani G; Gasparri ML; Di Donato V; Zanaboni F; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25468458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.
    Nie JC; Yan AQ; Liu XS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Nov; 27(9):1990-1999. PubMed ID: 28858908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of conventional laparoscopy and robotic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
    Hao X; Han S; Wang Y
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2015 Nov; 11 Suppl():C258-64. PubMed ID: 26612449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology.
    Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Walz J; Bannier M; Buttarelli M; Gurriet B; De Laparrent T; Blache JL
    Surg Endosc; 2008 Dec; 22(12):2743-7. PubMed ID: 18814002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. First experience of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute using the robot-assisted laparoscopic approach in radical hysterectomies for cervical cancer.
    Zaghloul AS; El-Minawi AM; ElKordy MA; Younes AK; Mahmoud AM; Fadlalla WM; Mohamed GA
    J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2018 Jun; 30(2):61-67. PubMed ID: 29691094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perioperative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy with mini-laparotomy versus open hysterectomy for uterus weighing more than 250 g.
    Gupta N; Mohling S; Mckendrick R; Elkattah R; Holcombe J; Furr RS; Boren T; DePasquale S
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):641-645. PubMed ID: 29453729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: A case matched control study.
    Gallotta V; Conte C; Federico A; Vizzielli G; Gueli Alletti S; Tortorella L; Pedone Anchora L; Cosentino F; Chiantera V; Fagotti A; D'Indinosante M; Pelligra S; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 44(6):754-759. PubMed ID: 29422253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficacy and safety outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy in Chinese older women with cervical cancer compared with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
    Luo C; Liu M; Li X
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):61. PubMed ID: 29716555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Superiority of robotic surgery for cervical cancer in comparison with traditional approaches: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liu Z; Li X; Tian S; Zhu T; Yao Y; Tao Y
    Int J Surg; 2017 Apr; 40():145-154. PubMed ID: 28238959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy compared with open radical hysterectomy.
    Geisler JP; Orr CJ; Khurshid N; Phibbs G; Manahan KJ
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Apr; 20(3):438-42. PubMed ID: 20375811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.