247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27546048)
1. New Trends in Inspecting GPCR-ligand Recognition Process: the Contribution of the Molecular Modeling Section (MMS) at the University of Padova.
Ciancetta A; Cuzzolin A; Deganutti G; Sturlese M; Salmaso V; Cristiani A; Sabbadin D; Moro S
Mol Inform; 2016 Sep; 35(8-9):440-8. PubMed ID: 27546048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advances in Computational Techniques to Study GPCR-Ligand Recognition.
Ciancetta A; Sabbadin D; Federico S; Spalluto G; Moro S
Trends Pharmacol Sci; 2015 Dec; 36(12):878-890. PubMed ID: 26538318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of Docking-Based Virtual Screening for GPCR Ligands with Homology Modeled Structures: A Case Study of the Angiotensin II Type I Receptor.
Chen H; Fu W; Wang Z; Wang X; Lei T; Zhu F; Li D; Chang S; Xu L; Hou T
ACS Chem Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 10(1):677-689. PubMed ID: 30265513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of Ligand Binding to GPCRs Through Computational Methods.
Vasile S; Esguerra M; Jespers W; Oliveira A; Sallander J; Åqvist J; Gutiérrez-de-Terán H
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():23-44. PubMed ID: 29188557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Synergistic Use of GPCR Modeling and SDM Experiments to Understand Ligand Binding.
Potterton A; Heifetz A; Townsend-Nicholson A
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():335-343. PubMed ID: 29188570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Structure versus function-The impact of computational methods on the discovery of specific GPCR-ligands.
Bermudez M; Wolber G
Bioorg Med Chem; 2015 Jul; 23(14):3907-12. PubMed ID: 25828056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. GPCR Homology Model Generation for Lead Optimization.
Tautermann CS
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():115-131. PubMed ID: 29188560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Benchmarking GPCR homology model template selection in combination with de novo loop generation.
Szwabowski GL; Castleman PN; Sears CK; Wink LH; Cole JA; Baker DL; Parrill AL
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1027-1044. PubMed ID: 32737667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computational studies of G protein-coupled receptor complexes: Structure and dynamics.
Sensoy O; Almeida JG; Shabbir J; Moreira IS; Morra G
Methods Cell Biol; 2017; 142():205-245. PubMed ID: 28964337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving virtual screening of G protein-coupled receptors via ligand-directed modeling.
Coudrat T; Simms J; Christopoulos A; Wootten D; Sexton PM
PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Nov; 13(11):e1005819. PubMed ID: 29131821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integrating Pharmacophore into Membrane Molecular Dynamics Simulations to Improve Homology Modeling of G Protein-coupled Receptors with Ligand Selectivity: A2A Adenosine Receptor as an Example.
Zeng L; Guan M; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2015 Dec; 86(6):1438-50. PubMed ID: 26072970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recent Trends and Applications of Molecular Modeling in GPCR⁻Ligand Recognition and Structure-Based Drug Design.
Yuan X; Xu Y
Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Jul; 19(7):. PubMed ID: 30036949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ensemble Docking in Drug Discovery: How Many Protein Configurations from Molecular Dynamics Simulations are Needed To Reproduce Known Ligand Binding?
Evangelista Falcon W; Ellingson SR; Smith JC; Baudry J
J Phys Chem B; 2019 Jun; 123(25):5189-5195. PubMed ID: 30695645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modeling and Deorphanization of Orphan GPCRs.
Diaz C; Angelloz-Nicoud P; Pihan E
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1705():413-429. PubMed ID: 29188576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Machine Learning Approach for the Discovery of Ligand-Specific Functional Mechanisms of GPCRs.
Plante A; Shore DM; Morra G; Khelashvili G; Weinstein H
Molecules; 2019 Jun; 24(11):. PubMed ID: 31159491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficiency of Homology Modeling Assisted Molecular Docking in G-protein Coupled Receptors.
Bhunia SS; Saxena AK
Curr Top Med Chem; 2021; 21(4):269-294. PubMed ID: 32901584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dopamine D3 receptor antagonist reveals a cryptic pocket in aminergic GPCRs.
Ferruz N; Doerr S; Vanase-Frawley MA; Zou Y; Chen X; Marr ES; Nelson RT; Kormos BL; Wager TT; Hou X; Villalobos A; Sciabola S; De Fabritiis G
Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):897. PubMed ID: 29343833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. GPCR homology model template selection benchmarking: Global versus local similarity measures.
Castleman PN; Sears CK; Cole JA; Baker DL; Parrill AL
J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Jan; 86():235-246. PubMed ID: 30390544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Metadynamics-Based Protocol for the Determination of GPCR-Ligand Binding Modes.
Söldner CA; Horn AHC; Sticht H
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 31013635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Could the presence of sodium ion influence the accuracy and precision of the ligand-posing in the human A
Margiotta E; Deganutti G; Moro S
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Dec; 32(12):1337-1346. PubMed ID: 30361971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
