These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27546081)

  • 1. [The Safety of MR Conditional Cochlear Implant at 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging System].
    Takahashi D; Ogura A; Hayashi N; Seino S; Kawai R; Matsuda T; Doi T; Tsuchihashi T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Aug; 72(8):674-80. PubMed ID: 27546081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging on internal magnet strength in Med-El Combi 40+ cochlear implants.
    Wackym PA; Michel MA; Prost RW; Banks KL; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Aug; 114(8):1355-61. PubMed ID: 15280707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MRI induced torque and demagnetization in retention magnets for a bone conduction implant.
    Jansson KJ; Håkansson B; Reinfeldt S; Taghavi H; Eeg-Olofsson M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2014 Jun; 61(6):1887-93. PubMed ID: 24845299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System.
    Dyer RK; Nakmali D; Dormer KJ
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1321-33. PubMed ID: 16885731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reversing the polarity of a cochlear implant magnet after magnetic resonance imaging.
    Jeon JH; Bae MR; Chang JW; Choi JY
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2012 Aug; 39(4):415-7. PubMed ID: 21889279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of a Novel 3T MRI Compatible Cochlear Implant Magnet: Torque, Forces, Demagnetization, and Imaging.
    Tysome JR; Tam YC; Patterson I; Graves MJ; Gazibegovic D
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Dec; 40(10):e966-e974. PubMed ID: 31524762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Demagnetization of cochlear implants and temperature changes in 3.0T MRI environment.
    Majdani O; Leinung M; Rau T; Akbarian A; Zimmerling M; Lenarz M; Lenarz T; Labadie R
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Dec; 139(6):833-9. PubMed ID: 19041512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Factors for Degaussing of a Cochlear Implant Magnet in the MR Scanner].
    Koganezawa T; Uchiyama N; Teshigawara M; Ogura A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2017; 73(12):1216-1223. PubMed ID: 29269616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging with cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants: Are we truly practicing MRI safety?
    Shew M; Wichova H; Lin J; Ledbetter LN; Staecker H
    Laryngoscope; 2019 Feb; 129(2):482-489. PubMed ID: 30412276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety study of the Cochlear Nucleus 24 device with internal magnet in the 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner.
    Gubbels SP; McMenomey SO
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Jun; 116(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 16735911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MRI information for commonly used otologic implants: review and update.
    Azadarmaki R; Tubbs R; Chen DA; Shellock FG
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Apr; 150(4):512-9. PubMed ID: 24398365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk of magnetic resonance imaging-induced magnet dislocation for different types of cochlear implants: a single-center retrospective study.
    Rupp R; Balk M; Sievert M; Leibl V; Schleder S; Allner M; Iro H; Hoppe U; Hornung J; Gostian AO
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Apr; 52(1):28. PubMed ID: 37085925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear Implant Magnet Dislocation: Simulations and Measurements of Force and Torque at 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Eerkens HJ; Smits C; Hofman MBM
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1276-1283. PubMed ID: 33657576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cochlear Implants without Magnet Removal: A Radiology-Administered Protocol to Enhance Operational Efficiency and Improve Workflow.
    Johnson BJ; Macielak RJ; Watson RE; Heimer JM; Wiste BJ; Lane JI; Edmonson HA; Carlson ML
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Aug; 44(7):664-671. PubMed ID: 37278159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [High field MR imaging: magnetic field interactions of aneurysm clips, coronary artery stents and iliac artery stents with a 3.0 Tesla MR system].
    Sommer T; Maintz D; Schmiedel A; Hackenbroch M; Hofer U; Urbach H; Pavlidis C; Träber F; Schild H; Höher M
    Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):731-8. PubMed ID: 15122473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging and cochlear implants: compatibility and safety aspects.
    Teissl C; Kremser C; Hochmair ES; Hochmair-Desoyer IJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1999 Jan; 9(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 10030647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic resonance imaging with the Digisonic SP Neurelec cochlear implant.
    Vincent C; Ruzza I; Vaneecloo FM; Dubrulle F
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Sep; 265(9):1043-6. PubMed ID: 18297299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dislocation of cochlear implant magnet during 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging despite head bandaging, and its repositioning using an endoscopic approach.
    Leong WJC; Yuen HW
    J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Oct; 132(10):943-945. PubMed ID: 30152297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dislocation of cochlear implant magnet as a complication following MRI.
    Murtojärvi S; Salonen J
    Duodecim; 2017; 133(5):497-500. PubMed ID: 29206000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility testing of the Clarion 1.2 cochlear implant.
    Weber BP; Goldring JE; Santogrossi T; Koestler H; Tziviskos G; Battmer R; Lenarz Th
    Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 9752965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.