These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27547194)

  • 1. Stimulus-Response Compatibility Effect in the Near-Far Dimension: A Developmental Study.
    Richez A; Olivier G; Coello Y
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1169. PubMed ID: 27547194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of irrelevant response dimension on stimulus response compatibility.
    Shi K; Wang L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Mar; 223():103495. PubMed ID: 34999352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Approach and avoidance movements are unaffected by cognitive conflict: a comparison of the Simon effect and stimulus-response compatibility.
    Kerzel D; Buetti S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):456-61. PubMed ID: 22454332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influences of different combinations of conceptual, perceptual, and structural similarity on stimulus-response compatibility.
    Proctor RW; Wang H; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 11873856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of directional compatibility on the response latencies of ocular and manual movements.
    Niechwiej-Szwedo E; McIlroy WE; Green R; Verrier MC
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Apr; 162(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 15599726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parsing the Neural Mechanisms of Short-Term and Long-Term Associations in the Flanker Tasks: An ERP Analysis.
    Cheng W; Huang Q; Chen Y; Dai W; Cui L; Shan S; Chen Z; Zhou S
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2021; 15():626907. PubMed ID: 34421550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dissociating bottom-up and top-down processes in a manual stimulus-response compatibility task.
    Cieslik EC; Zilles K; Kurth F; Eickhoff SB
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Sep; 104(3):1472-83. PubMed ID: 20573974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects emerge even when the stimulus position is task irrelevant.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Jun; 59(6):1021-32. PubMed ID: 16885141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the role of stimulus code-response modality compatibility on the spatial Stroop effect.
    Liao MJ; Wang SH
    Ergonomics; 2015; 58(8):1372-87. PubMed ID: 25654656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Processing irrelevant location information: practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks.
    Proctor RW; Lu CH
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 10087857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inhibitory function in the stimulus-response compatibility task.
    Tsuchida N
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Feb; 100(1):249-57. PubMed ID: 15773715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural correlates of partial transmission of sensorimotor information in the cerebral cortex.
    Requin J; Riehle A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1995 Nov; 90(1-3):81-95. PubMed ID: 8525878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stimulus-set location does not affect orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Psychol Res; 2004 Dec; 69(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 14634811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pointing hand stimuli induce spatial compatibility effects and effector priming.
    Nishimura A; Michimata C
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():219. PubMed ID: 23637688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus and response conflict in the color-word Stroop task: a combined electro-myography and event-related potential study.
    Szucs D; Soltész F
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():63-76. PubMed ID: 20153298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pupillometric contributions to deciphering Stroop conflicts.
    Hershman R; Henik A
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):325-333. PubMed ID: 31396822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities.
    Boyer TW; Longo MR; Bertenthal BI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Mar; 139(3):440-8. PubMed ID: 22326448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Between-task transfer of learning from spatial compatibility to a color stroop task.
    Marini M; Iani C; Nicoletti R; Rubichi S
    Exp Psychol; 2011; 58(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 21592943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Representing response position relative to display location: influence on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility.
    Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Jul; 58(5):839-64. PubMed ID: 16194938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.