These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27547370)

  • 1. A comparison of absolute performance of different correlative and mechanistic species distribution models in an independent area.
    Shabani F; Kumar L; Ahmadi M
    Ecol Evol; 2016 Aug; 6(16):5973-86. PubMed ID: 27547370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Species distribution models and empirical test: Comparing predictions with well-understood geographical distribution of
    Sarquis JA; Cristaldi MA; Arzamendia V; Bellini G; Giraudo AR
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Nov; 8(21):10497-10509. PubMed ID: 30464822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Usutu virus induced mass mortalities of songbirds in Central Europe: Are habitat models suitable to predict dead birds in unsampled regions?
    Walter M; Brugger K; Rubel F
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Nov; 159():162-170. PubMed ID: 30314779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The predictive performance and stability of six species distribution models.
    Duan RY; Kong XQ; Huang MY; Fan WY; Wang ZG
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112764. PubMed ID: 25383906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why choose Random Forest to predict rare species distribution with few samples in large undersampled areas? Three Asian crane species models provide supporting evidence.
    Mi C; Huettmann F; Guo Y; Han X; Wen L
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e2849. PubMed ID: 28097060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MaxEnt brings comparable results when the input data are being completed; Model parameterization of four species distribution models.
    Ahmadi M; Hemami MR; Kaboli M; Shabani F
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Feb; 13(2):e9827. PubMed ID: 36820245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Which SDM Model, CLIMEX vs. MaxEnt, Best Forecasts
    Hayat U; Shi J; Wu Z; Rizwan M; Haider MS
    Insects; 2024 May; 15(5):. PubMed ID: 38786880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transferability of correlative and process-based species distribution models revisited: A response to Booth.
    Higgins SI; Larcombe MJ; Beeton NJ; Conradi T
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Oct; 11(19):13613-13617. PubMed ID: 34646495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Global spatial distribution of Prosopis juliflora - one of the world's worst 100 invasive alien species under changing climate using multiple machine learning models.
    Pasha SV; Reddy CS
    Environ Monit Assess; 2024 Jan; 196(2):196. PubMed ID: 38265744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrating mechanistic and empirical model projections to assess climate impacts on tree species distributions in northwestern North America.
    Case MJ; Lawler JJ
    Glob Chang Biol; 2017 May; 23(5):2005-2015. PubMed ID: 27859937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Predicting the potential suitable distribution area of the apple snail Pomacea canaliculata in China based on multiple ecological niche models.].
    Zhang HT; Luo D; Mu XD; Xu M; Wei H; Luo JR; Zhang JE; Hu YC
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2016 Apr; 27(4):1277-1284. PubMed ID: 29732786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modelling the effects of topographic heterogeneity on distribution of Nitraria tangutorum Bobr. species in deserts using LiDAR-data.
    Zhou H; Feng L; Fu L; Sharma RP; Zhou X; Zhao X
    Sci Rep; 2023 Aug; 13(1):13673. PubMed ID: 37608034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial habitat suitability prediction of essential oil wild plants on Indonesia's degraded lands.
    Renjana E; Firdiana ER; Angio MH; Ningrum LW; Lailaty IQ; Rahadiantoro A; Martiansyah I; Zulkarnaen R; Rahayu A; Raharjo PD; Abywijaya IK; Usmadi D; Risna RA; Cropper WP; Yudaputra A
    PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17210. PubMed ID: 38577415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unraveling climate influences on the distribution of the parapatric newts
    Iannella M; Cerasoli F; Biondi M
    Front Zool; 2017; 14():55. PubMed ID: 29255477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the importance of predictor choice, modelling technique, and number of pseudo-absences for bioclimatic envelope model performance.
    Čengić M; Rost J; Remenska D; Janse JH; Huijbregts MAJ; Schipper AM
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Nov; 10(21):12307-12317. PubMed ID: 33209289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting the potential impacts of climate change on the endangered
    Wouyou HG; Lokonon BE; Idohou R; Zossou-Akete AG; Assogbadjo AE; Glèlè Kakaï R
    Heliyon; 2022 Mar; 8(3):e09022. PubMed ID: 35252617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Combined Use of Correlative and Mechanistic Species Distribution Models Benefits Low Conservation Status Species.
    Rougier T; Lassalle G; Drouineau H; Dumoulin N; Faure T; Deffuant G; Rochard E; Lambert P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139194. PubMed ID: 26426280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dispersal and extrapolation on the accuracy of temporal predictions from distribution models for the Darwin's frog.
    Uribe-Rivera DE; Soto-Azat C; Valenzuela-Sánchez A; Bizama G; Simonetti JA; Pliscoff P
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Jul; 27(5):1633-1645. PubMed ID: 28397328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the geographical distributions of
    De Vivo M; Huang JP
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Nov; 12(11):e9546. PubMed ID: 36447597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Climate Modelling Shows Increased Risk to Eucalyptus sideroxylon on the Eastern Coast of Australia Compared to Eucalyptus albens.
    Shabani F; Kumar L; Ahmadi M
    Plants (Basel); 2017 Nov; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 29186755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.