209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27547861)
1. Cost-Effectiveness of Tomosynthesis in Annual Screening Mammography.
Kalra VB; Wu X; Haas BM; Forman HP; Philpotts LE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Nov; 207(5):1152-1155. PubMed ID: 27547861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative effectiveness of combined digital mammography and tomosynthesis screening for women with dense breasts.
Lee CI; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Sprague BL; Tosteson AN; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Stout NK; Jarvik JG; Ramsey SD; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):772-80. PubMed ID: 25350548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Baseline Screening Mammography: Performance of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Akhtar AL; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):1143-8. PubMed ID: 26496565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening.
Haas BM; Kalra V; Geisel J; Raghu M; Durand M; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2013 Dec; 269(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23901124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Population-based Breast Cancer Screening: A Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis.
Sankatsing VDV; Juraniec K; Grimm SE; Joore MA; Pijnappel RM; de Koning HJ; van Ravesteyn NT
Radiology; 2020 Oct; 297(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 32749212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The cost-effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis in a population breast cancer screening program.
Wang J; Phi XA; Greuter MJW; Daszczuk AM; Feenstra TL; Pijnappel RM; Vermeulen KM; Buls N; Houssami N; Lu W; de Bock GH
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5437-5445. PubMed ID: 32382844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography.
Durand MA; Haas BM; Yao X; Geisel JL; Raghu M; Hooley RJ; Horvath LJ; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2015 Jan; 274(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 25188431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of breast MR imaging and screen-film mammography for screening BRCA1 gene mutation carriers.
Lee JM; McMahon PM; Kong CY; Kopans DB; Ryan PD; Ozanne EM; Halpern EF; Gazelle GS
Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 20177093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tomosynthesis Impact on Breast Cancer Screening in Patients Younger Than 50 Years Old.
Rose SL; Shisler JL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jun; 210(6):1401-1404. PubMed ID: 29629810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast MRI screening for average-risk women: A monte carlo simulation cost-benefit analysis.
Mango VL; Goel A; Mema E; Kwak E; Ha R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 49(7):e216-e221. PubMed ID: 30632645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.
Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of age on breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.
Rafferty EA; Rose SL; Miller DP; Durand MA; Conant EF; Copit DS; Friedewald SM; Plecha DM; Ott IL; Hayes MK; Carlson KL; Cink TM; Barke LD; Greer LN; Niklason LT
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Aug; 164(3):659-666. PubMed ID: 28523569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.
Friedewald SM; Rafferty EA; Rose SL; Durand MA; Plecha DM; Greenberg JS; Hayes MK; Copit DS; Carlson KL; Cink TM; Barke LD; Greer LN; Miller DP; Conant EF
JAMA; 2014 Jun; 311(24):2499-507. PubMed ID: 25058084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared to mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population.
Moore SG; Shenoy PJ; Fanucchi L; Tumeh JW; Flowers CR
BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Jan; 9():9. PubMed ID: 19144138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast screening using 2D-mammography or integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) for single-reading or double-reading--evidence to guide future screening strategies.
Houssami N; Macaskill P; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Ciatto S
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jul; 50(10):1799-1807. PubMed ID: 24746887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total cost-effectiveness of mammography screening strategies.
Mittmann N; Stout NK; Lee P; Tosteson AN; Trentham-Dietz A; Alagoz O; Yaffe MJ
Health Rep; 2015 Dec; 26(12):16-25. PubMed ID: 26676235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The cost-effectiveness of adding tomosynthesis to mammography-based breast cancer screening: an economic analysis.
Cressman S; Mar C; Sam J; Kan L; Lohrisch C; Spinelli JJ
CMAJ Open; 2021; 9(2):E443-E450. PubMed ID: 33888549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Organized versus Opportunistic Screening for Breast Cancer in Austria.
Schiller-Fruehwirth I; Jahn B; Einzinger P; Zauner G; Urach C; Siebert U
Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1048-1057. PubMed ID: 28964436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
