140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27548004)
1. Estimating diagnostic accuracy without a gold standard: A continued controversy.
Collins J; Albert PS
J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(6):1078-1082. PubMed ID: 27548004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating diagnostic accuracy of multiple binary tests with an imperfect reference standard.
Albert PS
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(5):780-97. PubMed ID: 19101935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of diagnostic tests when there is no gold standard. A review of methods.
Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Coomarasamy A; Khan KS; Bossuyt PM
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Dec; 11(50):iii, ix-51. PubMed ID: 18021577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fuzzy gold standards: Approaches to handling an imperfect reference standard.
Walsh T
J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74 Suppl 1():S47-S49. PubMed ID: 29929589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating diagnostic accuracy of raters without a gold standard by exploiting a group of experts.
Zhang B; Chen Z; Albert PS
Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1294-302. PubMed ID: 23006010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Problems in detecting misfit of latent class models in diagnostic research without a gold standard were shown.
van Smeden M; Oberski DL; Reitsma JB; Vermunt JK; Moons KG; de Groot JA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jun; 74():158-66. PubMed ID: 26628335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imputation approaches for estimating diagnostic accuracy for multiple tests from partially verified designs.
Albert PS
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):947-57. PubMed ID: 17825024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy From Studies With Multiple Raters and Partial Gold Standard Evaluation.
Albert PS; Dodd LE
J Am Stat Assoc; 2008 Mar; 103(481):61-73. PubMed ID: 19802353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adjusting for differential-verification bias in diagnostic-accuracy studies: a Bayesian approach.
de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG
Epidemiology; 2011 Mar; 22(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21228702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cautionary note on the robustness of latent class models for estimating diagnostic error without a gold standard.
Albert PS; Dodd LE
Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):427-35. PubMed ID: 15180668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard.
Liu Y; Chen Y; Chu H
Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25358907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adjusting for partial verification or workup bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Brophy J; Joseph L; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG
Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 175(8):847-53. PubMed ID: 22422923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic test analyses in search of their gold standard: latent class analyses with random effects.
Goetghebeur E; Liinev J; Boelaert M; Van der Stuyft P
Stat Methods Med Res; 2000 Jun; 9(3):231-48. PubMed ID: 11084706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When do latent class models overstate accuracy for diagnostic and other classifiers in the absence of a gold standard?
Spencer BD
Biometrics; 2012 Jun; 68(2):559-66. PubMed ID: 22017371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The utility of prior information and stratification for parameter estimation with two screening tests but no gold standard.
Gustafson P
Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1203-17. PubMed ID: 15558709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating and comparing diagnostic tests' accuracy when the gold standard is not binary.
Obuchowski NA
Acad Radiol; 2005 Sep; 12(9):1198-204. PubMed ID: 16099683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnostic accuracy].
Simundić AM
Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():93-111. PubMed ID: 16526310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
Obuchowski NA
Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing accuracy of mammography in the presence of verification bias and intrareader correlation.
Zheng Y; Barlow WE; Cutter G
Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):259-68. PubMed ID: 15737102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Random effects models in latent class analysis for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests.
Qu Y; Tan M; Kutner MH
Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):797-810. PubMed ID: 8805757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
