614 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27548583)
1. Tailoring Breast Cancer Screening Intervals by Breast Density and Risk for Women Aged 50 Years or Older: Collaborative Modeling of Screening Outcomes.
Trentham-Dietz A; Kerlikowske K; Stout NK; Miglioretti DL; Schechter CB; Ergun MA; van den Broek JJ; Alagoz O; Sprague BL; van Ravesteyn NT; Near AM; Gangnon RE; Hampton JM; Chandler Y; de Koning HJ; Mandelblatt JS; Tosteson AN;
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Nov; 165(10):700-712. PubMed ID: 27548583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.
Mandelblatt JS; Stout NK; Schechter CB; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Krapcho M; Trentham-Dietz A; Munoz D; Lee SJ; Berry DA; van Ravesteyn NT; Alagoz O; Kerlikowske K; Tosteson AN; Near AM; Hoeffken A; Chang Y; Heijnsdijk EA; Chisholm G; Huang X; Huang H; Ergun MA; Gangnon R; Sprague BL; Plevritis S; Feuer E; de Koning HJ; Cronin KA
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):215-25. PubMed ID: 26756606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incorporating Baseline Breast Density When Screening Women at Average Risk for Breast Cancer : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Shih YT; Dong W; Xu Y; Etzioni R; Shen Y
Ann Intern Med; 2021 May; 174(5):602-612. PubMed ID: 33556275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.
Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefits, harms, and costs for breast cancer screening after US implementation of digital mammography.
Stout NK; Lee SJ; Schechter CB; Kerlikowske K; Alagoz O; Berry D; Buist DS; Cevik M; Chisholm G; de Koning HJ; Huang H; Hubbard RA; Miglioretti DL; Munsell MF; Trentham-Dietz A; van Ravesteyn NT; Tosteson AN; Mandelblatt JS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2014 Jun; 106(6):dju092. PubMed ID: 24872543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Collaborative Modeling to Compare Different Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: A Decision Analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Trentham-Dietz A; Chapman CH; Jayasekera J; Lowry KP; Heckman-Stoddard BM; Hampton JM; Caswell-Jin JL; Gangnon RE; Lu Y; Huang H; Stein S; Sun L; Gil Quessep EJ; Yang Y; Lu Y; Song J; Muñoz DF; Li Y; Kurian AW; Kerlikowske K; O'Meara ES; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Feuer EJ; Berry D; Plevritis SK; Huang X; de Koning HJ; van Ravesteyn NT; Lee SJ; Alagoz O; Schechter CB; Stout NK; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS
JAMA; 2024 Jun; 331(22):1947-1960. PubMed ID: 38687505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk.
van Ravesteyn NT; Miglioretti DL; Stout NK; Lee SJ; Schechter CB; Buist DS; Huang H; Heijnsdijk EA; Trentham-Dietz A; Alagoz O; Near AM; Kerlikowske K; Nelson HD; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ
Ann Intern Med; 2012 May; 156(9):609-17. PubMed ID: 22547470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trade-Offs Between Harms and Benefits of Different Breast Cancer Screening Intervals Among Low-Risk Women.
van Ravesteyn NT; Schechter CB; Hampton JM; Alagoz O; van den Broek JJ; Kerlikowske K; Mandelblatt JS; Miglioretti DL; Sprague BL; Stout NK; de Koning HJ; Trentham-Dietz A; Tosteson ANA;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2021 Aug; 113(8):1017-1026. PubMed ID: 33515225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation-Induced Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality From Digital Mammography Screening: A Modeling Study.
Miglioretti DL; Lange J; van den Broek JJ; Lee CI; van Ravesteyn NT; Ritley D; Kerlikowske K; Fenton JJ; Melnikow J; de Koning HJ; Hubbard RA
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):205-14. PubMed ID: 26756460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk stratification in breast cancer screening: Cost-effectiveness and harm-benefit ratios for low-risk and high-risk women.
Sankatsing VDV; van Ravesteyn NT; Heijnsdijk EAM; Broeders MJM; de Koning HJ
Int J Cancer; 2020 Dec; 147(11):3059-3067. PubMed ID: 32484237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benefits and Harms of Mammography Screening for Women With Down Syndrome: a Collaborative Modeling Study.
Alagoz O; Hajjar A; Chootipongchaivat S; van Ravesteyn NT; Yeh JM; Ergun MA; de Koning HJ; Chicoine B; Martin B
J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Nov; 34(11):2374-2381. PubMed ID: 31385214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.
Myers ER; Moorman P; Gierisch JM; Havrilesky LJ; Grimm LJ; Ghate S; Davidson B; Mongtomery RC; Crowley MJ; McCrory DC; Kendrick A; Sanders GD
JAMA; 2015 Oct; 314(15):1615-34. PubMed ID: 26501537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.
Nelson HD; Pappas M; Cantor A; Griffin J; Daeges M; Humphrey L
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):256-67. PubMed ID: 26756737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy.
Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Hubbard RA; Geller B; Dittus K; Braithwaite D; Wernli KJ; Miglioretti DL; O'Meara ES;
JAMA Intern Med; 2013 May; 173(9):807-16. PubMed ID: 23552817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening for Survivors of Childhood Cancer Treated With Chest Radiation : A Comparative Modeling Study.
Yeh JM; Lowry KP; Schechter CB; Diller LR; Alagoz O; Armstrong GT; Hampton JM; Leisenring W; Liu Q; Mandelblatt JS; Miglioretti DL; Moskowitz CS; Oeffinger KC; Trentham-Dietz A; Stout NK
Ann Intern Med; 2020 Sep; 173(5):331-341. PubMed ID: 32628531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefits and harms of annual, biennial, or triennial breast cancer mammography screening for women at average risk of breast cancer: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC).
Canelo-Aybar C; Posso M; Montero N; Solà I; Saz-Parkinson Z; Duffy SW; Follmann M; Gräwingholt A; Giorgi Rossi P; Alonso-Coello P
Br J Cancer; 2022 Mar; 126(4):673-688. PubMed ID: 34837076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data.
Nelson HD; O'Meara ES; Kerlikowske K; Balch S; Miglioretti D
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):226-35. PubMed ID: 26756902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density.
Lowry KP; Coley RY; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Herschorn S; Tosteson ANA; Rauscher G; Lee CI
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jul; 3(7):e2011792. PubMed ID: 32721031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
