These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

34 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27548735)

  • 1. Prolonged acid reflux monitoring using acid exposure time and DeMeester score: two days are not enough.
    Lee ME; Ghosh G; Rooney K; Soumekh A; Schnoll-Sussman F; Katz P
    Surg Endosc; 2024 May; 38(5):2515-2521. PubMed ID: 38467859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 48-Hour pH monitoring increases the risk of false positive studies when the capsule is prematurely passed.
    Iqbal A; Lee YK; Vitamvas M; Oleynikov D
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2007 May; 11(5):638-41. PubMed ID: 17468923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Severe chest pain after retention of wireless pH capsule].
    Duarte-Chang C; Zúñiga Cisneros J
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2023; 43(4):383-386. PubMed ID: 38228307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictors of Pathological Gastroesophageal Reflux among Emirati Patients with Reflux Symptoms Who Undergo Wireless pH Monitoring.
    Shehata MA; Malik TA; Alzaabi MHJ; Ali ABAA; Tenaiji KSAA; Singh Y; Wallace MB
    Middle East J Dig Dis; 2023 Oct; 15(4):242-248. PubMed ID: 38523885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lyon Consensus pH Monitoring Gray Zone Is more Prone to be Actual Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease According to the DeMeester Score.
    Padua F; Herbella FAM; Patti MG
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2218-2220. PubMed ID: 33948864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. National Dental Association: Third Day.-Afternoon Session.
    Int Dent J (Phila); 1900 Feb; 21(2):116-123. PubMed ID: 37912647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. American Dental Association: August 6, 1896.-Third Day.-Afternoon Session.
    Int Dent J (Phila); 1897 Mar; 18(3):169-175. PubMed ID: 37912165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Wireless 24, 48, and 96 Hour or Impedance or Oropharyngeal Prolonged pH Monitoring: Which Test, When, and Why for GERD?
    Chae S; Richter JE
    Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2018 Sep; 20(11):52. PubMed ID: 30259210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wireless capsule pH monitoring: does it fulfil all expectations?
    Maerten P; Ortner M; Michetti P; Dorta G
    Digestion; 2007; 76(3-4):235-40. PubMed ID: 18174686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wireless pH capsule--yield in clinical practice.
    Roman S; Mion F; Zerbib F; Benamouzig R; Letard JC; Bruley des Varannes S
    Endoscopy; 2012 Mar; 44(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 22275050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sedation and Afternoon Placement of the 48-Hour Wireless Ambulatory pH Capsule Results in More Reflux on the First Day.
    Patel R; Chae S; Kumar A; Richter JE
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2017 Aug; 51(7):594-598. PubMed ID: 27548735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring.
    Chander B; Hanley-Williams N; Deng Y; Sheth A
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 46(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 21959323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of prolonged 48-h wireless capsule esophageal pH monitoring on diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease and evaluation of the relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes.
    Domingues GR; Moraes-Filho JP; Domingues AG
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2011; 48(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 21537538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of data obtained from sedated versus unsedated wireless telemetry capsule placement: does sedation affect the results of ambulatory 48-hour pH testing?
    Belafsky PC; Godin DA; Garcia JC; Rahim N
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Jun; 115(6):1109-13. PubMed ID: 15933532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Continuous 48-Hour Wireless Esophageal pH Monitoring in Children: Comparison Between Days 1 and 2.
    Ravi A; Gunasekaran T; Berman J
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2016 Jan; 62(1):87-9. PubMed ID: 26196198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.