These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27549327)

  • 1. Misoprostol Vaginal Insert in Labor Induction: A Cost-Consequences Model for 5 European Countries-An Economic Evaluation Supported with Literature Review and Retrospective Data Collection.
    Bierut A; Dowgiałło-Smolarczyk J; Pieniążek I; Stelmachowski J; Pacocha K; Sobkowski M; Baev OR; Walczak J
    Adv Ther; 2016 Oct; 33(10):1755-1770. PubMed ID: 27549327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of obstetrical outcomes and costs between misoprostol and dinoprostone for induction of labor.
    Nadia Bennett K; Park H; Cioffi J; Calixte R; Vintzileos A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3732-6. PubMed ID: 26782646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study.
    Marsdal KE; Sørbye IK; Gaudernack LC; Lukasse M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jan; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 29304769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction in resource use with the misoprostol vaginal insert vs the dinoprostone vaginal insert for labour induction: a model-based analysis from a United Kingdom healthcare perspective.
    Draycott T; van der Nelson H; Montouchet C; Ruff L; Andersson F
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Feb; 16():49. PubMed ID: 26864022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol for labor induction in term pregnancies: a pair-matched case-control study.
    Döbert M; Brandstetter A; Henrich W; Rawnaq T; Hasselbeck H; Döbert TF; Hinkson L; Schwaerzler P
    J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 28672758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Misoprostol for term labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Saeed GA; Fakhar S; Nisar N; Alam AY
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 50(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 21482368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone vaginal insert: a systematic review and metaanalysis.
    Austin SC; Sanchez-Ramos L; Adair CD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 202(6):624.e1-9. PubMed ID: 20430362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal heart rate and cardiotocographic abnormalities with varying dose misoprostol vaginal inserts.
    Stephenson ML; Powers BL; Wing DA
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2013 Jan; 26(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 22712609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Pevzner L; Alfirevic Z; Powers BL; Wing DA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 21353372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Obstetric outcomes of pre-induction of labor with a 200 μg misoprostol vaginal insert.
    Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Tyloch M; Sopońska-Brzoszczyk P; Nowak K; Dziedzic D; Dzikowska E; Grabiec M
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(11):606-612. PubMed ID: 29303214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction.
    Sifakis S; Angelakis E; Avgoustinakis E; Fragouli Y; Mantas N; Koukoura O; Vardaki E; Koumantakis E
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Apr; 275(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 17028904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Safe for the Induction of Labor in High-Risk Pregnancy Obese Women?
    Varlas VN; Bostan G; Nasui BA; Bacalbasa N; Pop AL
    Healthcare (Basel); 2021 Apr; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 33919898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized controlled trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter plus oxytocin for labor induction.
    Moraes Filho OB; Albuquerque RM; Cecatti JG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Aug; 89(8):1045-52. PubMed ID: 20636243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Induction of labor: a comparative study of intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone.
    Ayaz A; Shaukat S; Farooq MU; Mehmood K; Ahmad I; Ali Bahoo ML
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 49(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 20708519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vaginal misoprostol for term labor induction.
    Bauer TA; Brown DL; Chai LK
    Ann Pharmacother; 1997 Nov; 31(11):1391-3. PubMed ID: 9391696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review.
    Crane JM; Butler B; Young DC; Hannah ME
    BJOG; 2006 Dec; 113(12):1366-76. PubMed ID: 17081181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term.
    Hassan AA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert in parous women for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Ewert K; Powers B; Robertson S; Alfirevic Z
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17077234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Initial clinical experience with a misoprostol vaginal insert in comparison with a dinoprostone insert for inducing labor.
    Mayer RB; Oppelt P; Shebl O; Pömer J; Allerstorfer C; Weiss C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 May; 200():89-93. PubMed ID: 26995147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.