These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27549566)

  • 61. Short-term outcome of patients with robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: for localised carcinoma of prostate.
    Lo KL; Ng CF; Lam CN; Hou SS; To KF; Yip SK
    Hong Kong Med J; 2010 Feb; 16(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 20124571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Editorial Comment from Mr Skarecky to Comparative investigation on clinical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between experienced open prostatic surgeons and novice open surgeons in a laparoscopically naïve center with a limited caseload.
    Skarecky D
    Int J Urol; 2015 May; 22(5):476. PubMed ID: 25752216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Editorial Comment from Dr Shiroki to Comparative investigation on clinical outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between experienced open prostatic surgeons and novice open surgeons in a laparoscopically naïve center with a limited caseload.
    Shiroki R
    Int J Urol; 2015 May; 22(5):475. PubMed ID: 25721847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The impact of robotics on treatment of localized prostate cancer and resident education in Rochester, New York.
    Madeb R; Golijanin D; Knopf JK; Kowalczyk J; Feng C; Rashid H; Wu G; Eichel L; Valvo JR
    J Endourol; 2011 Apr; 25(4):573-7. PubMed ID: 21410333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic and Laparoscopic Simple Prostatectomy: A European-American Multi-institutional Analysis.
    Autorino R; Zargar H; Mariano MB; Sanchez-Salas R; Sotelo RJ; Chlosta PL; Castillo O; Matei DV; Celia A; Koc G; Vora A; Aron M; Parsons JK; Pini G; Jensen JC; Sutherland D; Cathelineau X; Nuñez Bragayrac LA; Varkarakis IM; Amparore D; Ferro M; Gallo G; Volpe A; Vuruskan H; Bandi G; Hwang J; Nething J; Muruve N; Chopra S; Patel ND; Derweesh I; Champ Weeks D; Spier R; Kowalczyk K; Lynch J; Harbin A; Verghese M; Samavedi S; Molina WR; Dias E; Ahallal Y; Laydner H; Cherullo E; De Cobelli O; Thiel DD; Lagerkvist M; Haber GP; Kaouk J; Kim FJ; Lima E; Patel V; White W; Mottrie A; Porpiglia F
    Eur Urol; 2015 Jul; 68(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 25484140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Postoperative mortality 90 days after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and retropubic radical prostatectomy: a nationwide population-based study.
    Björklund J; Folkvaljon Y; Cole A; Carlsson S; Robinson D; Loeb S; Stattin P; Akre O
    BJU Int; 2016 Aug; 118(2):302-6. PubMed ID: 26762928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Bolenz C; Gupta A; Hotze T; Ho R; Cadeddu JA; Roehrborn CG; Lotan Y
    Eur Urol; 2010 Mar; 57(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 19931979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases.
    Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Rasiah K; Stricker PD
    Eur Urol; 2014 Mar; 65(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 24287319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Positive surgical margins and early oncological outcomes of robotic vs open radical prostatectomy at a medium case-load institution.
    Antonelli A; Sodano M; Peroni A; Mittino I; Palumbo C; Furlan M; Carobbio F; Tardanico R; Fisogni S; Simeone C
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2017 Feb; 69(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 28009146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Pretreatment expectations of patients undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic or open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Schroeck FR; Krupski TL; Stewart SB; Bañez LL; Gerber L; Albala DM; Moul JW
    J Urol; 2012 Mar; 187(3):894-8. PubMed ID: 22245326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery.
    Steineck G; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Axén E; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Wallerstedt A; Persson J; Wilderäng U; Thorsteinsdottir T; Gustafsson O; Lagerkvist M; Jiborn T; Haglind E; Wiklund P;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Mar; 67(3):559-68. PubMed ID: 25457018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparative analysis of oncologic outcomes for open vs. robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.
    Lee D; Choi SK; Park J; Shim M; Kim A; Lee S; Song C; Ahn H
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):572-9. PubMed ID: 26279826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Is previous experience in laparoscopic necessary to perform robotic radical prostatectomy? A comparative study with robotic and the classic open procedure in patients with prostate cancer.
    Lott FM; Favorito LA
    Acta Cir Bras; 2015 Mar; 30(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 25790013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Impact on quality of life of radical prostatectomy after initial active surveillance: more to lose?
    van den Bergh RC; de Blok W; van Muilekom E; Tillier C; Venderbos LD; van der Poel HG
    Scand J Urol; 2014 Aug; 48(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 24506062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy for localised prostate cancer in thalidomide generation.
    Kusuma VRM; Ashton A; Moschanos D; Patil K; Perry M
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Jun; 12(2):373-376. PubMed ID: 28849319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Indication for and extension of pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis of five European institutions.
    Suardi N; Larcher A; Haese A; Ficarra V; Govorov A; Buffi NM; Walz J; Rocco B; Borghesi M; Steuber T; Pini G; Briganti A; Mottrie AM; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Pushkar D; Van Der Poel H;
    Eur Urol; 2014 Oct; 66(4):635-43. PubMed ID: 24411992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Adding a newly trained surgeon into a high-volume robotic prostatectomy group: are outcomes compromised?
    Wang L; Diaz M; Stricker H; Peabody JO; Menon M; Rogers CG
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 27350553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Work Disability After Robot-assisted or Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based Study.
    Plym A; Chiesa F; Voss M; Holmberg L; Johansson E; Stattin P; Lambe M
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jul; 70(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 26782345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy.
    Eden CG
    Asian J Androl; 2020; 22(2):149-151. PubMed ID: 31424028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Robotic Prostatectomy and Prostate Cancer-Related Medicaid Spending: Evidence from New York State.
    Ko H; Glied SA
    J Gen Intern Med; 2021 Nov; 36(11):3388-3394. PubMed ID: 33751413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.