These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27550392)

  • 1. Use and Interpretation of Propensity Scores in Aging Research: A Guide for Clinical Researchers.
    Kim DH; Pieper CF; Ahmed A; Colón-Emeric CS
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2016 Oct; 64(10):2065-2073. PubMed ID: 27550392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: propensity score methods in clinical nutrition research.
    Ali MS; Groenwold RH; Klungel OH
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2016 Aug; 104(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 27413128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the comparability of osteoporosis treatments using propensity score and negative control outcome methods in UK and Denmark electronic health record databases.
    Tan EH; Rathod-Mistry T; Strauss VY; O'Kelly J; Giorgianni F; Baxter R; Brunetti VC; Pedersen AB; Ehrenstein V; Prieto-Alhambra D
    J Bone Miner Res; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38619297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Observational Research Using Propensity Scores.
    Raghunathan K; Layton JB; Ohnuma T; Shaw AD
    Adv Chronic Kidney Dis; 2016 Nov; 23(6):367-372. PubMed ID: 28115080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Which Propensity Score Method Best Reduces Confounder Imbalance? An Example From a Retrospective Evaluation of a Childhood Obesity Intervention.
    Schroeder K; Jia H; Smaldone A
    Nurs Res; 2016; 65(6):465-474. PubMed ID: 27801717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On variance estimate for covariate adjustment by propensity score analysis.
    Zou B; Zou F; Shuster JJ; Tighe PJ; Koch GG; Zhou H
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3537-48. PubMed ID: 26999553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reporting of covariate selection and balance assessment in propensity score analysis is suboptimal: a systematic review.
    Ali MS; Groenwold RH; Belitser SV; Pestman WR; Hoes AW; Roes KC; Boer Ad; Klungel OH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 68(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 25433444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Propensity scores in observational research].
    Groenwold RH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2013; 157(29):A6179. PubMed ID: 23859107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Propensity Score Methods: Theory and Practice for Anesthesia Research.
    Schulte PJ; Mascha EJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1074-1084. PubMed ID: 29750691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Five Steps to Successfully Implement and Evaluate Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Research Studies.
    Staffa SJ; Zurakowski D
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1066-1073. PubMed ID: 29324498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical primer: propensity score matching and its alternatives.
    Benedetto U; Head SJ; Angelini GD; Blackstone EH
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Jun; 53(6):1112-1117. PubMed ID: 29684154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of the E-value in the presence of bias amplification: a simulation study.
    Barrette E; Higuera L; Wherry K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):79. PubMed ID: 38539082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the use of propensity scores in case of rare exposure.
    Hajage D; Tubach F; Steg PG; Bhatt DL; De Rycke Y
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():38. PubMed ID: 27036963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the impact of unmeasured confounding with internal validation data: an example cost evaluation in type 2 diabetes.
    Faries D; Peng X; Pawaskar M; Price K; Stamey JD; Seaman JW
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 23538177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using classification tree analysis to generate propensity score weights.
    Linden A; Yarnold PR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):703-712. PubMed ID: 28371206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adjusting for Confounding in Early Postlaunch Settings: Going Beyond Logistic Regression Models.
    Schmidt AF; Klungel OH; Groenwold RH;
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 26436519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A practical guide to propensity score analysis for applied clinical research.
    Lee J; Little TD
    Behav Res Ther; 2017 Nov; 98():76-90. PubMed ID: 28153337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Propensity Score Methods and Covariate Adjustment: Evaluation in 4 Cardiovascular Studies.
    Elze MC; Gregson J; Baber U; Williamson E; Sartori S; Mehran R; Nichols M; Stone GW; Pocock SJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(3):345-357. PubMed ID: 28104076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnitude and direction of missing confounders had different consequences on treatment effect estimation in propensity score analysis.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Fontaine C; Daurès JP; Devereaux PJ; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 87():87-97. PubMed ID: 28412467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new weighted balance measure helped to select the variables to be included in a propensity score model.
    Caruana E; Chevret S; Resche-Rigon M; Pirracchio R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1415-22.e2. PubMed ID: 26050059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.