These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2755133)

  • 1. Drinking-driving compliance in the United States: perceptions and behavior in 1983 and 1986.
    Snortum JR; Berger DE
    J Stud Alcohol; 1989 Jul; 50(4):306-19. PubMed ID: 2755133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Automobile drivers in the "drinking and driving" conflict: behavior pattern and influence factors].
    Kretschmer-Bäumel E
    Blutalkohol; 1989 Mar; 26(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 2706095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are lower legal blood alcohol limits and a combination of sanctions desirable in reducing drunken driver-involved traffic fatalities and traffic accidents?
    Deshapriya EB; Iwase N
    Accid Anal Prev; 1996 Nov; 28(6):721-31. PubMed ID: 9006640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the type of exposure to a roadside sobriety checkpoint influence driver perceptions regarding drunk driving?
    Beck KH; Moser ML
    Am J Health Behav; 2006; 30(3):268-77. PubMed ID: 16712441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The Netherlands Alcohol-Traffic Project].
    Sagel-Grande I
    Blutalkohol; 1993 Jul; 30(4):209-19. PubMed ID: 8373558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The efficacy of experimental interventions designed to reduce drinking among designated drivers.
    Lange JE; Reed MB; Johnson MB; Voas RB
    J Stud Alcohol; 2006 Mar; 67(2):261-8. PubMed ID: 16562408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk perceptions and DUI decisions of drivers in different legal environments: New evidence on differential deterrence from a Chinese sample.
    Yao J; Xiao T; Hou S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106188. PubMed ID: 34000676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategies to reduce driving under the influence of alcohol.
    DeJong W; Hingson R
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1998; 19():359-78. PubMed ID: 9611624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nationwide priorities to prevent drunk driving.
    Volpe JA
    Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co; 1984; 65(3):7. PubMed ID: 6545066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Initial deterrent effects of the crackdown on drinking drivers in the state of Arizona.
    Epperlein T
    Accid Anal Prev; 1987 Aug; 19(4):285-303. PubMed ID: 3651202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Problems in deterrence: a comparison of the driving histories of DUII and non-DUII drivers.
    Hall RL; Smith MM; Song L; Beerman K
    J Stud Alcohol; 1992 Nov; 53(6):576-81. PubMed ID: 1434634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Drinking and driving among American youth: beliefs and behaviors.
    Cameron TL
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 1982 Sep; 10(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 7173040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Offenses in alcoholic intoxication with reference to American research].
    Middendorff W
    Blutalkohol; 1991 May; 28(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 1867846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-interest and attitudes about legislation controlling alcohol.
    Crowe JW; Bailey WJ
    Psychol Rep; 1995 Jun; 76(3 Pt 1):995-1003. PubMed ID: 7568620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Driving while intoxicated: increased deterrence or alternative transportation for the drunk driver.
    Caudill BD; Kantor GK; Ungerleider S
    J Subst Abuse; 1990; 2(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 2136103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alcohol-Impaired Driving and Perceived Risks of Legal Consequences.
    Sloan FA; McCutchan SA; Eldred LM
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2017 Feb; 41(2):432-442. PubMed ID: 28056493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An argument for prioritizing drivers above the current illegal limit in the United States.
    Talpins SK
    Addiction; 2014 Jun; 109(6):875-7. PubMed ID: 24796398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effectiveness of alcohol control policies on alcohol-related traffic fatalities in the United States.
    Chang K; Wu CC; Ying YH
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():406-15. PubMed ID: 22269524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevalence and effectiveness of self-regulatory techniques used to avoid drunk driving.
    Brown SL
    J Behav Med; 1997 Feb; 20(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 9058179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decriminalizing drunk driving: a means to effective punishment.
    Ross HL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1991; 24(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 2055806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.