These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27552059)

  • 1. Control of information in working memory: Encoding and removal of distractors in the complex-span paradigm.
    Oberauer K; Lewandowsky S
    Cognition; 2016 Nov; 156():106-128. PubMed ID: 27552059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The fate of distractors in working memory: No evidence for their active removal.
    Dagry I; Barrouillet P
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():129-138. PubMed ID: 28886408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interference between maintenance and processing in working memory: the effect of item-distractor similarity in complex span.
    Oberauer K; Farrell S; Jarrold C; Pasiecznik K; Greaves M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):665-85. PubMed ID: 22141748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forgetting from working memory: does novelty encoding matter?
    Plancher G; Barrouillet P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):110-25. PubMed ID: 22563635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Turning simple span into complex span: Time for decay or interference from distractors?
    Lewandowsky S; Geiger SM; Morrell DB; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):958-78. PubMed ID: 20565212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling working memory: an interference model of complex span.
    Oberauer K; Lewandowsky S; Farrell S; Jarrold C; Greaves M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Oct; 19(5):779-819. PubMed ID: 22715024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Computational Model of Working Memory Integrating Time-Based Decay and Interference.
    Lemaire B; Portrat S
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():416. PubMed ID: 29666597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Working memory still needs verbal rehearsal.
    Lucidi A; Langerock N; Hoareau V; Lemaire B; Camos V; Barrouillet P
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 26446777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Where working memory meets long-term memory: The interplay of list length and distractors on memory performance.
    Loaiza VM; Halse SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1455-1472. PubMed ID: 30070565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK; Jha AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reconciling Two Computational Models of Working Memory in Aging.
    Hoareau V; Lemaire B; Portrat S; Plancher G
    Top Cogn Sci; 2016 Jan; 8(1):264-78. PubMed ID: 26748955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Elaboration by superposition: From interference in working memory to encoding in long-term memory.
    Piątkowski K; von Bastian CC; Zawadzka K; Hanczakowski M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Mar; 49(3):371-388. PubMed ID: 36201800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The removal of distractors in a multidistractor complex span task.
    Wang T; Yang C; Liang B
    Memory; 2023 Oct; 31(9):1185-1196. PubMed ID: 37608681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distractor-based retrieval in action control: the influence of encoding specificity.
    Laub R; Frings C
    Psychol Res; 2020 Apr; 84(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 30173278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence against decay in verbal working memory.
    Oberauer K; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 May; 142(2):380-411. PubMed ID: 22866686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the sources of forgetting in working memory: The test of competing hypotheses.
    Barrouillet P; Uittenhove K; Lucidi A; Langerock N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1714-1733. PubMed ID: 28726552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time of presentation affects auditory distraction: Changing-state and deviant sounds disrupt similar working memory processes.
    Körner U; Röer JP; Buchner A; Bell R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):457-471. PubMed ID: 29360013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load.
    Park S; Kim MS; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17924807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neural evidence that inhibition is linked to the affective devaluation of distractors that match the contents of working memory.
    De Vito D; Al-Aidroos N; Fenske MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():259-269. PubMed ID: 28341131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.