599 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27553266)
1. Mid- and long-term results of femoral component revision using the cement-in-cement technique: Average 10.8-year follow-up study.
Okuzu Y; Goto K; So K; Kuroda Y; Matsuda S
J Orthop Sci; 2016 Nov; 21(6):810-814. PubMed ID: 27553266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.
Madey SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jan; 79(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 9010186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.
Davis CM; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jul; 85(7):1264-9. PubMed ID: 12851351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cement-in-cement revision of the femoral stem: analysis of 1179 first-time revisions in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
Cnudde PH; Kärrholm J; Rolfson O; Timperley AJ; Mohaddes M
Bone Joint J; 2017 Apr; 99-B(4 Supple B):27-32. PubMed ID: 28363891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cement-in-cement femoral component revision in the multiply revised total hip arthroplasty: results with a minimum follow-up of five years.
Sandiford NA; Jameson SS; Wilson MJ; Hubble MJ; Timperley AJ; Howell JR
Bone Joint J; 2017 Feb; 99-B(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 28148661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Femoral impaction bone grafting in revision hip arthroplasty: 705 cases from the originating centre.
Wilson MJ; Hook S; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
Bone Joint J; 2016 Dec; 98-B(12):1611-1619. PubMed ID: 27909122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The S-ROM hydroxyapatite proximally-coated modular femoral stem in revision hip replacement: results of 397 hips at a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Imbuldeniya AM; Walter WK; Zicat BA; Walter WL
Bone Joint J; 2014 Jun; 96-B(6):730-6. PubMed ID: 24891571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical and radiological evaluation of revision hip arthroplasty using the cement-in-cement technique.
Goto K; Kawanabe K; Akiyama H; Morimoto T; Nakamura T
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Aug; 90(8):1013-8. PubMed ID: 18669955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Total hip arthroplasty with cement and use of a collared matte-finish femoral component: nineteen to twenty-year follow-up.
Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Firestone DE; Yehyawi TM; Goetz DD; Sullivan J; Vittetoe DA; O'Rourke MR; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Feb; 90(2):299-306. PubMed ID: 18245589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revision of the cemented femoral stem using a cement-in-cement technique: a five- to 15-year review.
Duncan WW; Hubble MJ; Howell JR; Whitehouse SL; Timperley AJ; Gie GA
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 May; 91(5):577-82. PubMed ID: 19407288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Uncemented grit-blasted straight tapered titanium stems in patients younger than fifty-five years of age. Fifteen to twenty-year results.
Aldinger PR; Jung AW; Pritsch M; Breusch S; Thomsen M; Ewerbeck V; Parsch D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jun; 91(6):1432-9. PubMed ID: 19487522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. A prospective study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
Xenos JS; Callaghan JJ; Heekin RD; Hopkinson WJ; Savory CG; Moore MS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 9973057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cement-within-cement femoral stem reimplantation technique].
Judl T; Jahoda D; Landor I; Pokorný D; Melicherčík P; Sosna A
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011; 78(5):416-22. PubMed ID: 22094155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Minimum twenty-five-year follow-up.
Callaghan JJ; Albright JC; Goetz DD; Olejniczak JP; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Apr; 82(4):487-97. PubMed ID: 10761939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cement-in-cement femoral revisions using a specially designed polished short revision stem; 24 consecutive stems followed for five to seven years.
te Stroet MA; Moret-Wever SG; de Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW
Hip Int; 2014; 24(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 24970322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The bone-vacuum cementing technique for the fixation of the stem in total hip arthroplasty.
Pitto RP; Kessler M; Schikora N; di Muria GV
Chir Organi Mov; 2001; 86(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 12025052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Primary total hip replacement with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. Follow-up study at an average of six years.
Woolson ST; Haber DF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 May; 78(5):698-705. PubMed ID: 8642026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented tapered femoral component.
McLaughlin JR; Lee KR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Jun; 90(6):1290-6. PubMed ID: 18519323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total hip arthroplasty after operative treatment of an acetabular fracture.
Weber M; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1998 Sep; 80(9):1295-305. PubMed ID: 9759814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
