These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2755335)

  • 1. Characterization of fluid flow using low-spatial-resolution velocity spectra from NMR images.
    Wendt RE; Nitz W; Murphy PH; Bryan RN
    Magn Reson Med; 1989 Apr; 10(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 2755335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of Spatial Resolution in Three-dimensional Cine Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging on the Accuracy of Hemodynamic Analysis.
    Fukuyama A; Isoda H; Morita K; Mori M; Watanabe T; Ishiguro K; Komori Y; Kosugi T
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Oct; 16(4):311-316. PubMed ID: 28132996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Localized real-time velocity spectra determination.
    Hu BS; Pauly JM; Nishimura DG
    Magn Reson Med; 1993 Sep; 30(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 8412614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nuclear magnetic resonance velocity spectra of steady flow.
    Wendt RE; Nitz WR; Murphy PH
    Magn Reson Med; 1990 Jul; 15(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 2374504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatially resolved and localized real-time velocity distribution.
    Irarrazabal P; Hu BS; Pauly JM; Nishimura DG
    Magn Reson Med; 1993 Aug; 30(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 8366802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flow quantification using low-spatial-resolution and low-velocity-resolution velocity images.
    Tsai CM; Olcott EW; Nishimura DG
    Magn Reson Med; 1999 Oct; 42(4):682-90. PubMed ID: 10502756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of velocity-encoded MR imaging and fluid dynamic modeling of steady and disturbed flow.
    Sun Y; Hearshen DO; Rankin GW; Haggar AM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 1633398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nuclear magnetic resonance velocity spectra of pulsatile flow in a rigid tube.
    Wendt RE; Wong WF
    Magn Reson Med; 1992 Oct; 27(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 1461109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of complex flow using MR phase imaging--a study of parameters influencing the phase/velocity relation.
    Ståhlberg F; Søndergaard L; Thomsen C; Henriksen O
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 10(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 1545672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential flow imaging by NMR.
    Xiang QS; Nalcioglu O
    Magn Reson Med; 1989 Oct; 12(1):14-24. PubMed ID: 2607957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Projection images of the position-velocity joint spin density distribution.
    Xiang QS; Nalcioglu O
    Magn Reson Med; 1990 Jul; 15(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 2374491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of acceleration on the accuracy of MR phase velocity measurements.
    Oshinski JN; Ku DN; Bohning DE; Pettigrew RI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 1446110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Method for quantification of low flow velocities by magnetic resonance phase imaging.
    Ståhlberg F; Nordell B; Ericsson A; Bergstrand G; Greitz T; Persson B; Sperber G
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1986; 369():486-9. PubMed ID: 2980535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Echo-planar high-resolution flow velocity mapping.
    Firmin DN; Klipstein RH; Hounsfield GL; Paley MP; Longmore DB
    Magn Reson Med; 1989 Dec; 12(3):316-27. PubMed ID: 2628682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding acceleration-induced displacement artifacts in phase-contrast MR velocity measurements.
    Frayne R; Rutt BK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 7766984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance imaging kappa-space segmentation using phase-encoding groups the accuracy of quantitative measurements of pulsatile flow.
    Li H; Clarke GD; NessAvier M; Liu H; Peshock R
    Med Phys; 1995 Apr; 22(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 7609719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of cocurrent and countercurrent flow-related enhancement in MR imaging.
    Whittemore AR; Bradley WG; Jinkins JR
    Radiology; 1989 Jan; 170(1 Pt 1):265-71. PubMed ID: 2909107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of magnetic resonance velocimetry for steady flow.
    Ku DN; Biancheri CL; Pettigrew RI; Peifer JW; Markou CP; Engels H
    J Biomech Eng; 1990 Nov; 112(4):464-72. PubMed ID: 2273875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: phase contrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.
    van Ooij P; Guédon A; Poelma C; Schneiders J; Rutten MC; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; VanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
    NMR Biomed; 2012 Jan; 25(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21480417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro agreement between magnetic resonance imaging and intraluminal Doppler ultrasound for high flow velocity measurements.
    Matre K; Ersland L; Larsen TH; Andersen E
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2002 May; 36(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 12079639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.