These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27553453)

  • 21. A modified Wright-Fisher model that incorporates Ne: A variant of the standard model with increased biological realism and reduced computational complexity.
    Zhao L; Gossmann TI; Waxman D
    J Theor Biol; 2016 Mar; 393():218-28. PubMed ID: 26796316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A generalized approach for estimating effective population size from temporal changes in allele frequency.
    Waples RS
    Genetics; 1989 Feb; 121(2):379-91. PubMed ID: 2731727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effective population size of current human population.
    Park L
    Genet Res (Camb); 2011 Apr; 93(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 21450133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improved confidence intervals for the linkage disequilibrium method for estimating effective population size.
    Jones AT; Ovenden JR; Wang YG
    Heredity (Edinb); 2016 Oct; 117(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 27005004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Resampling: An improvement of importance sampling in varying population size models.
    Merle C; Leblois R; Rousset F; Pudlo P
    Theor Popul Biol; 2017 Apr; 114():70-87. PubMed ID: 27712980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of the linkage-disequilibrium method for the estimation of effective population size when generations overlap: an empirical case.
    Saura M; Tenesa A; Woolliams JA; Fernández A; Villanueva B
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Nov; 16():922. PubMed ID: 26559809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detecting population declines via monitoring the effective number of breeders (N
    Luikart G; Antao T; Hand BK; Muhlfeld CC; Boyer MC; Cosart T; Trethewey B; Al-Chockhachy R; Waples RS
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Feb; 21(2):379-393. PubMed ID: 32881365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An empirical test of the estimation of historical effective population size using Drosophila melanogaster.
    Novo I; Pérez-Pereira N; Santiago E; Quesada H; Caballero A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Oct; 23(7):1632-1640. PubMed ID: 37455584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimation of contemporary effective population size and population declines using RAD sequence data.
    Nunziata SO; Weisrock DW
    Heredity (Edinb); 2018 Mar; 120(3):196-207. PubMed ID: 29269932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of sample size on estimates of genetic differentiation and effective population size for Schistosoma mansoni populations.
    Barbosa LM; Barros BC; de Souza Rodrigues M; Silva LK; Reis MG; Blanton RE
    Int J Parasitol; 2018 Dec; 48(14):1149-1154. PubMed ID: 30367861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of effective population size for the long-lived darkblotched rockfish Sebastes crameri.
    Gomez-Uchida D; Banks MA
    J Hered; 2006; 97(6):603-6. PubMed ID: 17158468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Variance effective population size is affected by census size in sub-structured populations.
    Ryman N; Laikre L; Hössjer O
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Aug; 23(6):1334-1347. PubMed ID: 37122118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effective size of populations under partial inbreeding and selection on a set of linked additive genes.
    Nomura T
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):563-84. PubMed ID: 16161812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relationship between effective and demographic population size in continuously distributed populations.
    Pierson JC; Graves TA; Banks SC; Kendall KC; Lindenmayer DB
    Evol Appl; 2018 Aug; 11(7):1162-1175. PubMed ID: 30026804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The estimates of effective population size based on linkage disequilibrium are virtually unaffected by natural selection.
    Novo I; Santiago E; Caballero A
    PLoS Genet; 2022 Jan; 18(1):e1009764. PubMed ID: 35077457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Samples from subdivided populations yield biased estimates of effective size that overestimate the rate of loss of genetic variation.
    Ryman N; Allendorf FW; Jorde PE; Laikre L; Hössjer O
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Jan; 14(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 24034449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A pseudo-likelihood method for estimating effective population size from temporally spaced samples.
    Wang J
    Genet Res; 2001 Dec; 78(3):243-57. PubMed ID: 11865714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using gridCoal to assess whether standard population genetic theory holds in the presence of spatio-temporal heterogeneity in population size.
    Szép E; Trubenová B; Csilléry K
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Nov; 22(8):2941-2955. PubMed ID: 35765749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effective population sizes of a major vector of human diseases,
    Saarman NP; Gloria-Soria A; Anderson EC; Evans BR; Pless E; Cosme LV; Gonzalez-Acosta C; Kamgang B; Wesson DM; Powell JR
    Evol Appl; 2017 Dec; 10(10):1031-1039. PubMed ID: 29151858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do estimates of contemporary effective population size tell us what we want to know?
    Ryman N; Laikre L; Hössjer O
    Mol Ecol; 2019 Apr; 28(8):1904-1918. PubMed ID: 30663828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.