These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27553645)

  • 1. Views of Cohort Study Participants about Returning Research Results in the Context of Precision Medicine.
    Hyams T; Bowen DJ; Condit C; Grossman J; Fitzmaurice M; Goodman D; Wenzel L; Edwards KL
    Public Health Genomics; 2016; 19(5):269-75. PubMed ID: 27553645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ethics, genetics and science policy.
    Tranoy KE
    Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Apr; (77):13-20. PubMed ID: 15997530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When research seems like clinical care: a qualitative study of the communication of individual cancer genetic research results.
    Miller FA; Giacomini M; Ahern C; Robert JS; de Laat S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2008 Feb; 9():4. PubMed ID: 18294373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disclosure of genetic information obtained through research.
    Quaid KA; Jessup NM; Meslin EM
    Genet Test; 2004; 8(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 15727261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2397-406. PubMed ID: 12692171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of views regarding the use of de-identified data.
    Goodman D; Johnson CO; Bowen D; Smith M; Wenzel L; Edwards KL
    Transl Behav Med; 2018 Jan; 8(1):113-118. PubMed ID: 29385588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consent Issues in Genetic Research: Views of Research Participants.
    Goodman D; Johnson CO; Wenzel L; Bowen D; Condit C; Edwards KL
    Public Health Genomics; 2016; 19(4):220-8. PubMed ID: 27376949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationships matter: ethical considerations for returning results to family members of deceased subjects.
    Milner LC; Liu EY; Garrison NA
    Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(10):66-7. PubMed ID: 24024819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advanced cancer patients' attitudes towards, and experiences with, screening for somatic mutations in tumours: a qualitative study.
    Liang R; Meiser B; Smith S; Kasparian NA; Lewis CR; Chin M; Long GV; Ward R; Menzies AM; Harris-Wai JN; Kaur R
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2017 Nov; 26(6):. PubMed ID: 27730730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct to consumer genetic testing and the libertarian right to test.
    Loi M
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Sep; 42(9):574-7. PubMed ID: 27009980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical and practical implications of returning genetic research results: two Australian case studies.
    Tiller J; Trainer AH; Campbell I; Lacaze PA
    Med J Aust; 2021 Apr; 214(6):259-262.e1. PubMed ID: 33161572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Taking our obligations to research participants seriously: disclosing individual results of genetic research.
    Manolio TA
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):32-4; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The return of individual research findings in paediatric genetic research.
    Hens K; Nys H; Cassiman JJ; Dierickx K
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Mar; 37(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 21059631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One thing leads to another: the cascade of obligations when researchers report genetic research results to study participants.
    Miller FA; Hayeems RZ; Li L; Bytautas JP
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2012 Aug; 20(8):837-43. PubMed ID: 22333903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Letting the gene out of the bottle: a comment on returning individual research results to participants.
    Ossorio PN
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):24-5; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethical issues associated with conducting genetic family studies of complex disease.
    Arar NH; Hazuda H; Steinbach R; Arar MY; Abboud HE
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 15(9):712-9. PubMed ID: 16157258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Alaska Native community's views on genetic research, testing, and return of results: Results from a public deliberation.
    Hiratsuka VY; Beans JA; Blanchard JW; Reedy J; Blacksher E; Lund JR; Spicer PG
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229540. PubMed ID: 32176704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetics as a tool to improve cancer outcomes: ethics and policy.
    Burke W; Press N
    Nat Rev Cancer; 2006 Jun; 6(6):476-82. PubMed ID: 16723994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Balancing Benefits and Risks of Immortal Data: Participants' Views of Open Consent in the Personal Genome Project.
    Zarate OA; Brody JG; Brown P; Ramirez-Andreotta MD; Perovich L; Matz J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2016; 46(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 26678513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Views of female breast cancer patients who donated biologic samples regarding storage and use of samples for genetic research.
    Kaphingst KA; Janoff JM; Harris LN; Emmons KM
    Clin Genet; 2006 May; 69(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 16650074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.