BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27554353)

  • 1. A comparison of a new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage and anterior cervical plate for single and multilevel ACDF: a minimum 2-year follow-up study.
    Li Z; Zhao Y; Tang J; Ren D; Guo J; Wang H; Li L; Hou S
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):1129-1139. PubMed ID: 27554353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new zero-profile, stand-alone Fidji cervical cage for the treatment of the single and multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease.
    Li Z; Wang H; Li L; Tang J; Ren D; Hou S
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 41():115-122. PubMed ID: 28262396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up.
    Chen Y; Lü G; Wang B; Li L; Kuang L
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2255-62. PubMed ID: 26906171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Self-Locking Stand-Alone Cage and Cage with Anterior Plate for Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis.
    Zhang D; Liu B; Zhu J; Li C; Wei F; Yuan Y; Zhu D
    World Neurosurg; 2019 May; 125():e117-e131. PubMed ID: 30677575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of a self-locking stand-alone cage and anterior cervical plate for ACDF: Minimum 3-year assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes.
    Zhou J; Li J; Lin H; Li X; Zhou X; Dong J
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 Jul; 170():73-78. PubMed ID: 29734112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical disc disease: a retrospective study.
    Wu WJ; Jiang LS; Liang Y; Dai LY
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jul; 21(7):1374-82. PubMed ID: 22205113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The application of zero-profile anchored spacer in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
    Wang Z; Jiang W; Li X; Wang H; Shi J; Chen J; Meng B; Yang H
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Jan; 24(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 25337859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can Self-Locking Cages Offer the Same Clinical Outcomes as Anterior Cage-with-Plate Fixation for 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) in Mid-Term Follow-Up?
    Zhu D; Zhang D; Liu B; Li C; Zhu J
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 Jan; 25():547-557. PubMed ID: 30659165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of a zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages with an anterior plate in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Liu Y; Wang H; Li X; Chen J; Sun H; Wang G; Yang H; Jiang W
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1881-90. PubMed ID: 26968876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stand-alone Cervical Cages Versus Anterior Cervical Plates in 2-Level Cervical Anterior Interbody Fusion Patients: Analysis of Adjacent Segment Degeneration.
    Ji GY; Oh CH; Shin DA; Ha Y; Kim KN; Yoon DH; Yudoyono F
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Aug; 28(7):E433-8. PubMed ID: 23897053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) and plate fixation in 2-level noncontiguous anterior cervical discectomy and fusion- a retrospective study.
    Zhang Z; Li Y; Jiang W
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Apr; 19(1):119. PubMed ID: 29665815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Efficiency of Zero-profile Implant in Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Long-term Follow-up Study.
    Li Y; Hao D; He B; Wang X; Yan L
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Dec; 28(10):398-403. PubMed ID: 24136051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical and imaging outcomes of self-locking stand-alone cages and anterior cage-with-plate in three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective comparative study.
    Tang L; Liu X; Lu Y; Liu Y; Yu J; Zhao J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Apr; 18(1):276. PubMed ID: 37020306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early follow-up outcomes of a new zero-profile implant used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
    Miao J; Shen Y; Kuang Y; Yang L; Wang X; Chen Y; Chen D
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Jul; 26(5):E193-7. PubMed ID: 23168389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with stand-alone anchored cages versus posterior laminectomy and fusion for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up.
    Wang B; Lü G; Kuang L
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Jul; 19(1):216. PubMed ID: 30001719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Fate of Adjacent Segments After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: The Influence of an Anterior Plate System.
    Ahn SS; Paik HK; Chin DK; Kim SH; Kim DW; Ku MG
    World Neurosurg; 2016 May; 89():42-50. PubMed ID: 26828457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Efficacy comparison of zero-profile intervertebral fusion and stand-alone interbody cage combined with cage-titanium plate construct in treatment of two-segment skip cervical spondylosis].
    Xia BC; Sun JG; Huang SL; Tian LY; Zhu YH; Pi GF
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 May; 102(19):1450-1457. PubMed ID: 35599410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical outcomes of locking stand-alone cage versus anterior plate construct in two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lu VM; Mobbs RJ; Fang B; Phan K
    Eur Spine J; 2019 Jan; 28(1):199-208. PubMed ID: 30390163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of plate-cage construct and stand-alone anchored spacer in the surgical treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary clinical study.
    Shi S; Liu ZD; Li XF; Qian L; Zhong GB; Chen FJ
    Spine J; 2015 Sep; 15(9):1973-80. PubMed ID: 25912505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison among perfect-C®, zero-P®, and plates with a cage in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.
    Noh SH; Zhang HY
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Jan; 19(1):33. PubMed ID: 29368613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.