These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Assessment of the quality of reporting in abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analyses in periodontology and implant dentistry. Faggion CM; Liu J; Huda F; Atieh M J Periodontal Res; 2014 Apr; 49(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 23668725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions. Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reporting completeness of abstracts of systematic reviews published in leading dental specialty journals. Seehra J; Fleming PS; Polychronopoulou A; Pandis N Eur J Oral Sci; 2013 Apr; 121(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 23489893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A methodological survey of the analysis, reporting and interpretation of Absolute Risk ReductiOn in systematic revieWs (ARROW): a study protocol. Alonso-Coello P; Carrasco-Labra A; Brignardello-Petersen R; Neumann I; Akl EA; Sun X; Johnston BC; Briel M; Busse JW; Glujovsky D; Granados CE; Iorio A; Irfan A; Martínez García L; Mustafa RA; Ramirez-Morera A; Solà I; Tikkinen KA; Ebrahim S; Vandvik PO; Zhang Y; Selva A; Sanabria AJ; Zazueta OE; Vernooij RW; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH Syst Rev; 2013 Dec; 2():113. PubMed ID: 24330779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Publication of reviews synthesizing child health evidence (PORSCHE): a survey of authors to identify factors associated with publication in Cochrane and non-Cochrane sources. Hartling L; Shave K; Thomson D; Fernandes RM; Wingert A; Williams K Syst Rev; 2016 Jun; 5(1):104. PubMed ID: 27328935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research. Li G; Abbade LPF; Nwosu I; Jin Y; Leenus A; Maaz M; Wang M; Bhatt M; Zielinski L; Sanger N; Bantoto B; Luo C; Shams I; Shahid H; Chang Y; Sun G; Mbuagbaw L; Samaan Z; Levine MAH; Adachi JD; Thabane L BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):181. PubMed ID: 29287585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of reporting in abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading journals of periodontology and implant dentistry: a survey. Faggion CM; Giannakopoulos NN J Periodontol; 2012 Oct; 83(10):1251-6. PubMed ID: 22220771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic reviewers commonly contact study authors but do so with limited rigor. Mullan RJ; Flynn DN; Carlberg B; Tleyjeh IM; Kamath CC; LaBella ML; Erwin PJ; Guyatt GH; Montori VM J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 62(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 19013767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Converting systematic reviews to Cochrane format: a cross-sectional survey of Australian authors of systematic reviews. Piehl JH; Green S; McDonald S BMC Health Serv Res; 2003 Jan; 3(1):2. PubMed ID: 12533194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of outcomes and other variables between conference abstracts and subsequent peer-reviewed papers involving pre-harvest or abattoir-level interventions against foodborne pathogens. Snedeker KG; Campbell M; Totton SC; Guthrie A; Sargeant JM Prev Vet Med; 2010 Nov; 97(2):67-76. PubMed ID: 20739075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality and clarity in systematic review abstracts: an empirical study. Tsou AY; Treadwell JR Res Synth Methods; 2016 Dec; 7(4):447-458. PubMed ID: 27764903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. Moher D; Tetzlaff J; Tricco AC; Sampson M; Altman DG PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e78. PubMed ID: 17388659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Scoping review of systematic review abstracts about temporomandibular disorders: Comparison of search years 2004 and 2017. Rinchuse DJ; Greene CS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jul; 154(1):35-46.e9. PubMed ID: 29957316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Methodological review showed correct absolute effect size estimates for time-to-event outcomes in less than one-third of cancer-related systematic reviews. Skoetz N; Goldkuhle M; Weigl A; Dwan K; Labonté V; Dahm P; Meerpohl JJ; Djulbegovic B; van Dalen EC J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():1-9. PubMed ID: 30543910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]