681 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27555181)
1. Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.
Maitra S; Baidya DK; Arora MK; Bhattacharjee S; Khanna P
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():298-305. PubMed ID: 27555181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.
Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A network meta-analysis of the clinical properties of various types of supraglottic airway device in children.
Mihara T; Asakura A; Owada G; Yokoi A; Ka K; Goto T
Anaesthesia; 2017 Oct; 72(10):1251-1264. PubMed ID: 28737223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks.
Van Zundert TC; Brimacombe JR
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2012; 63(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 22783708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of i-gel(™) airway in children: a meta-analysis.
Maitra S; Baidya DK; Bhattacharjee S; Khanna P
Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 24(10):1072-9. PubMed ID: 25041224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Pro-Seal for controlled ventilation during general anaesthesia in adult patients: systematic review with meta-analysis.
Maitra S; Khanna P; Baidya DK
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2014 May; 31(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 24145803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Techniques for the insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: comparison of the Foley airway stylet tool with the introducer tool in a prospective, randomized study.
Chen MK; Hsu HT; Lu IC; Shih CK; Shen YC; Tseng KY; Cheng KI
BMC Anesthesiol; 2014; 14():105. PubMed ID: 25435806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel, LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal in elective surgery.
Liew GH; Yu ED; Shah SS; Kothandan H
Singapore Med J; 2016 Aug; 57(8):432-7. PubMed ID: 27549212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the i-gel and the laryngeal mask airway proseal during general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park SK; Choi GJ; Choi YS; Ahn EJ; Kang H
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119469. PubMed ID: 25812135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing leak pressure of LMA
Chaki T; Koizumi M; Tachibana S; Matsumoto T; Kumagai T; Hashimoto Y; Yamakage M
Can J Anaesth; 2024 Jan; 71(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 38017196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of LMA Supreme™ with i-gel™ and LMA ProSeal™ in children for airway management during general anaesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Bhattacharjee S; Som A; Maitra S
J Clin Anesth; 2017 Sep; 41():5-10. PubMed ID: 28802606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized comparison of the i-gel(TM) with the LMA Supreme (TM) in anesthetized adult patients.
Beleña JM; Núñez M; Vidal A; Gasco C; Alcojor A; Lee P; Pérez JL
Anaesthesist; 2015 Apr; 64(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 25801488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2003 Jan; 20(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12553391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.
Anand LK; Goel N; Singh M; Kapoor D
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2016 Jun; 54(2):44-50. PubMed ID: 27106162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.
Pajiyar AK; Wen Z; Wang H; Ma L; Miao L; Wang G
BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.
Beleña JM; Núñez M; Anta D; Carnero M; Gracia JL; Ayala JL; Alvarez R; Yuste J
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 23318811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of size 1 I-gel compared with size 1 ProSeal laryngeal mask in anesthetized infants and neonates.
Kayhan GE; Begec Z; Sanli M; Gedik E; Durmus M
ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():426186. PubMed ID: 25793219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative efficacy and safety of the Ambu(®) AuraOnce(™) laryngeal mask airway during general anaesthesia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Baidya DK; Chandralekha ; Darlong V; Pandey R; Maitra S; Khanna P
Anaesthesia; 2014 Sep; 69(9):1023-32. PubMed ID: 24801012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Second-Generation Supraglottic Airway Devices (i-gel versus LMA ProSeal) During Elective Surgery in Children.
Sanket B; Ramavakoda CY; Nishtala MR; Ravishankar CK; Ganigara A
AANA J; 2015 Aug; 83(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 26390746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
