193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27555865)
1. A Unified and Comprehensible View of Parametric and Kernel Methods for Genomic Prediction with Application to Rice.
Jacquin L; Cao TV; Ahmadi N
Front Genet; 2016; 7():145. PubMed ID: 27555865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic Prediction of Genotype × Environment Interaction Kernel Regression Models.
Cuevas J; Crossa J; Soberanis V; Pérez-Elizalde S; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Campos GL; Montesinos-López OA; Burgueño J
Plant Genome; 2016 Nov; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 27902799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modeling Epistasis in Genomic Selection.
Jiang Y; Reif JC
Genetics; 2015 Oct; 201(2):759-68. PubMed ID: 26219298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Parametric and nonparametric statistical methods for genomic selection of traits with additive and epistatic genetic architectures.
Howard R; Carriquiry AL; Beavis WD
G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Apr; 4(6):1027-46. PubMed ID: 24727289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of statistical methods for genomic selection in a mice population.
Neves HH; Carvalheiro R; Queiroz SA
BMC Genet; 2012 Nov; 13():100. PubMed ID: 23134637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Models and Whole-Genome Profiling Approaches for Genomic-Enabled Prediction of Septoria Tritici Blotch, Stagonospora Nodorum Blotch, and Tan Spot Resistance in Wheat.
Juliana P; Singh RP; Singh PK; Crossa J; Rutkoski JE; Poland JA; Bergstrom GC; Sorrells ME
Plant Genome; 2017 Jul; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 28724084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genome-wide prediction using Bayesian additive regression trees.
Waldmann P
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):42. PubMed ID: 27286957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genome-enabled methods for predicting litter size in pigs: a comparison.
Tusell L; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Forni S; Wu XL; Gianola D
Animal; 2013 Nov; 7(11):1739-49. PubMed ID: 23880322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring the areas of applicability of whole-genome prediction methods for Asian rice (Oryza sativa L.).
Onogi A; Ideta O; Inoshita Y; Ebana K; Yoshioka T; Yamasaki M; Iwata H
Theor Appl Genet; 2015 Jan; 128(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 25341369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. (Quasi) multitask support vector regression with heuristic hyperparameter optimization for whole-genome prediction of complex traits: a case study with carcass traits in broilers.
Alves AAC; Fernandes AFA; Lopes FB; Breen V; Hawken R; Gianola D; Rosa GJM
G3 (Bethesda); 2023 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 37216670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genome-Wide Prediction of Complex Traits in Two Outcrossing Plant Species Through Deep Learning and Bayesian Regularized Neural Network.
Maldonado C; Mora-Poblete F; Contreras-Soto RI; Ahmar S; Chen JT; do Amaral Júnior AT; Scapim CA
Front Plant Sci; 2020; 11():593897. PubMed ID: 33329658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Response to Early Generation Genomic Selection for Yield in Wheat.
Bonnett D; Li Y; Crossa J; Dreisigacker S; Basnet B; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Alvarado G; Jannink JL; Poland J; Sorrells M
Front Plant Sci; 2021; 12():718611. PubMed ID: 35087542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive ability of genome-assisted statistical models under various forms of gene action.
Momen M; Mehrgardi AA; Sheikhi A; Kranis A; Tusell L; Morota G; Rosa GJM; Gianola D
Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12309. PubMed ID: 30120288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lost in Translation: On the Problem of Data Coding in Penalized Whole Genome Regression with Interactions.
Martini JWR; Rosales F; Ha NT; Heise J; Wimmer V; Kneib T
G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Apr; 9(4):1117-1129. PubMed ID: 30760541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive assessment of single-step BLUP with linear and non-linear similarity RKHS kernels: A case study in chickens.
Momen M; Kranis A; Rosa GJM; Muir P; Gianola D
J Anim Breed Genet; 2022 May; 139(3):247-258. PubMed ID: 34931377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between linear and non-parametric regression models for genome-enabled prediction in wheat.
Pérez-Rodríguez P; Gianola D; González-Camacho JM; Crossa J; Manès Y; Dreisigacker S
G3 (Bethesda); 2012 Dec; 2(12):1595-605. PubMed ID: 23275882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting Growth Traits with Genomic Selection Methods in Zhikong Scallop (Chlamys farreri).
Wang Y; Sun G; Zeng Q; Chen Z; Hu X; Li H; Wang S; Bao Z
Mar Biotechnol (NY); 2018 Dec; 20(6):769-779. PubMed ID: 30116982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. KCRR: a nonlinear machine learning with a modified genomic similarity matrix improved the genomic prediction efficiency.
An B; Liang M; Chang T; Duan X; Du L; Xu L; Zhang L; Gao X; Li J; Gao H
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 33963831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic dissection of additive and non-additive genetic effects and genomic prediction in an open-pollinated family test of Japanese larch.
Dong L; Xie Y; Zhang Y; Wang R; Sun X
BMC Genomics; 2024 Jan; 25(1):11. PubMed ID: 38166605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genome-enabled prediction of genetic values using radial basis function neural networks.
González-Camacho JM; de Los Campos G; Pérez P; Gianola D; Cairns JE; Mahuku G; Babu R; Crossa J
Theor Appl Genet; 2012 Aug; 125(4):759-71. PubMed ID: 22566067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
