These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27556210)

  • 1. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography.
    Türk AG; Sabuncu M; Ünal S; Önal B; Ulusoy M
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2016; 24(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 27556210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of adaptation of ceramic inlays using optical coherence tomography and replica technique.
    Ayse Gozde T; Metin S; Mubin U
    Braz Oral Res; 2018 Feb; 32():e005. PubMed ID: 29412222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
    Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of gap size and cement type on gingival microleakage in Class V resin composite inlays.
    Browning WD; Safirstein J
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Aug; 28(8):541-4. PubMed ID: 9477882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal adaptation of a sintered ceramic inlay system before and after cementation.
    Gemalmaz D; Ozcan M; Yoruç AB; Alkumru HN
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Sep; 24(9):646-51. PubMed ID: 9357744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays.
    Farrell CV; Johnson GH; Oswald MT; Tucker RD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 18395539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of oxalate desensitizer with different resin cement-retained indirect composite inlays on fracture resistance of teeth.
    Shafiei F; Alavi AA; Karimi F; Ansarifard E
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):268-74. PubMed ID: 23279061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Indirect posterior restorations using a new chairside microhybrid resin composite system.
    Tay FR; Wei SH
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 11317389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal analysis of resin composite restorative systems using optical coherence tomography.
    Monteiro GQ; Montes MA; Gomes AS; Mota CC; Campello SL; Freitas AZ
    Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):e213-23. PubMed ID: 21925721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 10785294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning.
    Bortolotto T; Onisor I; Krejci I
    Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Mar; 11(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 17031673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
    Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical microleakage in MOD restorations: in vitro comparison of indirect and direct composite.
    Duquia Rde C; Osinaga PW; Demarco FF; de V Habekost L; Conceição EN
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(6):682-7. PubMed ID: 17153977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interfacial Evaluation of CAD/CAM Resin Inlays on the Cavity Floor Using Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography.
    Han SH; Shimada Y; Sadr A; Tagami J; Yang SE
    Oper Dent; 2020 Nov; 45(6):664-676. PubMed ID: 32997740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of restorative technique and thermal/mechanical treatment on marginal adaptation and compressive strength of esthetic restorations.
    de Paula AB; Duque C; Correr-Sobrinho L; Puppin-Rontani RM
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):434-40. PubMed ID: 18666502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.