163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27556315)
1. Experimental Validation of a Cardiac Simulator for in vitro Evaluation of Prosthetic Heart Valves.
Bazan O; Ortiz JP
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Apr; 31(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 27556315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hydrodynamic function of tilting disc prostheses and bileaflet valves in double valve replacement.
Strüber M; Campbell A; Richard G; Laas J
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1996; 10(6):422-7. PubMed ID: 8817137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fluid dynamics of the CarboMedics kinetic bileaflet prosthetic heart valve.
Baldwin JT; Campbell A; Luck C; Ogilvie W; Sauter J
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1997 Feb; 11(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 9080157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Harvested porcine mitral xenograft fixation: impact on fluid dynamic performance.
Jensen MO; Lemmon JD; Gessaghi VC; Conrad CP; Levine RA; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 11206757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of Tricuspid Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve Orientation Regarding the Flow Field Inside the Left Ventricle: In Vitro Hydrodynamic Characterization Based on 2D PIV Measurements.
Bazan O; Ortiz JP; Fukumasu NK; Pacifico AL; Yanagihara JI
Artif Organs; 2016 Feb; 40(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 26153483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.
Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An integrated macro/micro approach to evaluating pivot flow within the Medtronic ADVANTAGE bileaflet mechanical heart valve.
Shu MC; Gross JM; O'Rourke KK; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Jul; 12(4):503-12. PubMed ID: 12918854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bubble formation on St. Jude Medical mechanical heart valves: an in-vitro study.
Milo S; Gutfinger C; Chu GY; Gharib M
J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 May; 12(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 12803343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A D-Shaped Bileaflet Bioprosthesis which Replicates Physiological Left Ventricular Flow Patterns.
Tan SG; Kim S; Hon JK; Leo HL
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156580. PubMed ID: 27258099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative hydrodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valves.
Marquez S; Hon RT; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Nov; 10(6):802-11. PubMed ID: 11767190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of heart rate on the hemodynamics of bileaflet mechanical heart valves' prostheses (St. Jude Medical) in the aortic position and in the opening phase: A computational study.
Jahandardoost M; Fradet G; Mohammadi H
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Mar; 230(3):175-90. PubMed ID: 26786673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy.
Travis BR; Heinrich RS; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Hashim S; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of Mitral Annulus Diastolic Geometry on Intraventricular Filling Dynamics.
Okafor IU; Santhanakrishnan A; Raghav VS; Yoganathan AP
J Biomech Eng; 2015 Dec; 137(12):121007. PubMed ID: 26502376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of a novel stentless mitral valve using a pulsatile mitral valve simulator.
Kasegawa H; Iwasaki K; Kusunose S; Tatusta R; Doi T; Yasuda H; Umezu M
J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Jan; 21(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 22474745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro assessment of prosthetic valve function in mitral valve replacement with chordal preservation techniques.
Fontaine AA; He S; Stadter R; Ellis JT; Levine RA; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Mar; 5(2):186-98. PubMed ID: 8665014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High concordance of invasive and echocardiographic mean pressure gradients in patients with a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis.
Knebel F; Gliech V; Walde T; Eddicks S; Konertz W; Baumann G; Borges AC
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 May; 14(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 15974527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mitral valve dynamics in severe aortic stenosis before and after aortic valve replacement.
Tsang W; Veronesi F; Sugeng L; Weinert L; Takeuchi M; Jeevanandam V; Lang RM
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2013 Jun; 26(6):606-14. PubMed ID: 23602168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of prosthesis size and left ventricular mass on left ventricular diastolic reserve in patients with aortic valve prostheses.
Gonzalez-Juanatey JR; Vega Fernandez M; Gude F; Durán Muñoz DD; Román V; Iglesias Carreño C
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Sep; 10(5):611-8. PubMed ID: 11603601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
