These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27556363)

  • 41. Implantable Devices for Single-Sided Deafness and Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Ontario Health (Quality)
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2020; 20(1):1-165. PubMed ID: 32194878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Dual Variable Speed Compressor over a Single Fixed Speed Compressor.
    Kuk F; Slugocki C; Korhonen P; Seper E; Hau O
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):590-606. PubMed ID: 30420004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The relationship between speech recognition, behavioural listening effort, and subjective ratings.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(6):457-467. PubMed ID: 29381097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli.
    Carter L; Dillon H; Seymour J; Seeto M; Van Dun B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality.
    Boymans M; Dreschler WA
    Audiology; 2000; 39(5):260-8. PubMed ID: 11093610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Wireless binaural hearing aid technology for telephone use and listening in wind noise.
    Au A; Blakeley JM; Dowell RC; Rance G
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Apr; 58(4):193-199. PubMed ID: 30474445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of the CAMEQ2-HF method for fitting hearing aids with multichannel amplitude compression.
    Moore BC; Füllgrabe C
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):657-66. PubMed ID: 20526199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study.
    Bianchi F; Wendt D; Wassard C; Maas P; Lunner T; Rosenbom T; Holmberg M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Achieved Gain and Subjective Outcomes for a Wide-Bandwidth Contact Hearing Aid Fitted Using CAM2.
    Arbogast TL; Moore BCJ; Puria S; Dundas D; Brimacombe J; Edwards B; Carr Levy S
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):741-756. PubMed ID: 30300158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The Effects of Directional Processing on Objective and Subjective Listening Effort.
    Picou EM; Moore TM; Ricketts TA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):199-211. PubMed ID: 28114609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effectiveness of an Over-the-Counter Self-fitting Hearing Aid Compared With an Audiologist-Fitted Hearing Aid: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    De Sousa KC; Manchaiah V; Moore DR; Graham MA; Swanepoel W
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2023 Jun; 149(6):522-530. PubMed ID: 37052929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The relationship between listening conditions and alternative amplification schemes for multiple memory hearing aids.
    Keidser G
    Ear Hear; 1995 Dec; 16(6):575-86. PubMed ID: 8747807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Exploring Factors That Contribute to the Success of Rehabilitation With Hearing Aids.
    Lansbergen SE; Versfeld N; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 44(6):1514-1525. PubMed ID: 37792897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Expectations, prefitting counseling, and hearing aid outcome.
    Saunders GH; Lewis MS; Forsline A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 May; 20(5):320-34. PubMed ID: 19585963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Do Hearing Aids Address Real-World Hearing Difficulties for Adults With Mild Hearing Impairment? Results From a Pilot Study Using Ecological Momentary Assessment.
    Timmer BHB; Hickson L; Launer S
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518783608. PubMed ID: 29956590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A critical review of hearing-aid single-microphone noise-reduction studies in adults and children.
    Chong FY; Jenstad LM
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Aug; 13(6):600-608. PubMed ID: 29072542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Effects of Amplification on Listening Self-Efficacy in Adults With Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Kawaguchi L; Wu YH; Miller C
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Sep; 28(3):572-582. PubMed ID: 31296020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.