175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27556365)
1. Human Envelope Following Responses to Amplitude Modulation: Effects of Aging and Modulation Depth.
Dimitrijevic A; Alsamri J; John MS; Purcell D; George S; Zeng FG
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):e322-35. PubMed ID: 27556365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Role of Age-Related Declines in Subcortical Auditory Processing in Speech Perception in Noise.
Schoof T; Rosen S
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 17(5):441-60. PubMed ID: 27216166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison.
Johnson TA; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):559-76. PubMed ID: 16377993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Age-related changes in envelope-following responses at equalized peripheral or central activation.
Lai J; Sommer AL; Bartlett EL
Neurobiol Aging; 2017 Oct; 58():191-200. PubMed ID: 28753474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Age-related changes in the relationship between auditory brainstem responses and envelope-following responses.
Parthasarathy A; Datta J; Torres JA; Hopkins C; Bartlett EL
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Aug; 15(4):649-61. PubMed ID: 24845405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence that hidden hearing loss underlies amplitude modulation encoding deficits in individuals with and without tinnitus.
Paul BT; Bruce IC; Roberts LE
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():170-182. PubMed ID: 27888040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Masking Differentially Affects Envelope-following Responses in Young and Aged Animals.
Lai J; Bartlett EL
Neuroscience; 2018 Aug; 386():150-165. PubMed ID: 29953908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Relationship between Psychoacoustic and Electrophysiological Assessments of Temporal Resolution.
Heydari K; Tahaei AA; Pourbakht A; Haghani H; Nazeri A
J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):171-179. PubMed ID: 33873218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparisons of auditory steady state response and behavioral air conduction and bone conduction thresholds for infants and adults with normal hearing.
Casey KA; Small SA
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):423-39. PubMed ID: 24569693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Test-Retest Variability in the Characteristics of Envelope Following Responses Evoked by Speech Stimuli.
Easwar V; Scollie S; Aiken S; Purcell D
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):150-164. PubMed ID: 31136317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age-related changes in the auditory brainstem response.
Konrad-Martin D; Dille MF; McMillan G; Griest S; McDermott D; Fausti SA; Austin DF
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jan; 23(1):18-35; quiz 74-5. PubMed ID: 22284838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears.
Stamper GC; Johnson TA
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):172-84. PubMed ID: 25350405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Human auditory steady-state responses during sweeps of intensity.
Picton TW; van Roon P; John MS
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):542-57. PubMed ID: 17609615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability in Hearing Threshold Prediction in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Participants Using Mixed Multiple ASSR.
Israelsson KE; Bogo R; Berninger E
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 25751697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Establishing normal hearing with the dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state response compared to an auditory brainstem response protocol.
Swanepoel D; Schmulian D; Hugo R
Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Jan; 124(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 14977080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Stimulus Level and Bandwidth on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses in Adults With Normal Hearing.
Easwar V; Purcell DW; Aiken SJ; Parsa V; Scollie SD
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):619-34. PubMed ID: 26226607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity of envelope following responses to vowel polarity.
Easwar V; Beamish L; Aiken S; Choi JM; Scollie S; Purcell D
Hear Res; 2015 Feb; 320():38-50. PubMed ID: 25500177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
Lai J; Bartlett EL
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensorineural Hearing Loss Diminishes Use of Temporal Envelope Cues: Evidence From Roving-Level Tone-in-Noise Detection.
Leong UC; Schwarz DM; Henry KS; Carney LH
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):1009-1019. PubMed ID: 31985535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Envelope following responses predict speech-in-noise performance in normal-hearing listeners.
Mepani AM; Verhulst S; Hancock KE; Garrett M; Vasilkov V; Bennett K; de Gruttola V; Liberman MC; Maison SF
J Neurophysiol; 2021 Apr; 125(4):1213-1222. PubMed ID: 33656936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
