These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2755679)

  • 41. The frequency of bitewing radiographs.
    Shwartz M; Pliskin JS; Gröndahl H; Boffa J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Mar; 61(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 3458136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of the reproducibility of two bitewing techniques by means of a microdensitometric recording method.
    Beyer-Olsen EM; Eggen S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1983 Jan; 55(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 6572343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Task-specific enhancement filters in storage phosphor images from the Vistascan system for detection of proximal caries lesions of known size.
    Haiter-Neto F; Casanova MS; Frydenberg M; Wenzel A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jan; 107(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 19101494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Using compensating filters to reduce radiation dose.
    Katsuda T; Okazaki M; Kuroda C
    Radiol Technol; 1996; 68(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 8880967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Advantage of appropriate K-edge filters for one-shot dual-energy subtraction sialography.
    Kobayashi S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):151-62. PubMed ID: 9693527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparing the accuracy of panoramic and intraoral radiography in the diagnosis of proximal caries.
    Akkaya N; Kansu O; Kansu H; Cagirankaya LB; Arslan U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 16618850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of illumination on the accuracy of identifying interproximal carious lesions on bitewing radiographs.
    Deep P; Petropoulos D
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003; 69(7):444-6. PubMed ID: 12880556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison between Scanora panoramic radiography and bitewing radiography in the assessment of marginal bone tissue.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rangne K; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16687909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Physical measurements of heavy metal filter performance.
    Burgess AE
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 4000081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A clinical trial of the Nomad portable X-ray unit.
    Brooks SL; McMinn WE; Benavides E
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 91(2):54-8. PubMed ID: 19288662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Niobium/aluminum filters reduce patient exposure.
    Burns CB; Renner JB; Gratale P; Moyle LL
    Radiol Technol; 1992; 63(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 1736315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinically undetected dental caries assessed by bitewing screening in children with little caries experience.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 8181654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of a decrease of interproximal overexposure of bitewing radiographs on the diagnosis of approximal caries.
    ten Bosch JJ; Noordmans J; Arnold LV; Borsboom PC
    Caries Res; 1989; 23(5):328-33. PubMed ID: 2766318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Image resolution in dental and maxillofacial radiography with the conventional and "free focus" imaging concepts.
    Jensen TW; Goldberg AJ; Randall GJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1981 Jun; 51(6):653-61. PubMed ID: 6942366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of the use of a niobium filter for patient dose reduction in chest radiography.
    Thierens H; Kunnen M; Van der Plaetsen A; Segaert O
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Apr; 64(760):334-40. PubMed ID: 2025775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Use and quality of bitewing films in private dental offices.
    Jensen OE; Handelman SL; Iker HP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Feb; 63(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 3469609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Influence of tube potential setting and dose on the visibility of lesions in intraoral radiography.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 17403883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The use of added erbium filtration in intraoral radiography.
    Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Langland OE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Oct; 66(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 3186228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.