These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27556869)
1. Estimates of the Absolute and Relative Strengths of Diverse Alcoholic Drinks by Young People. Walker S; Higgs S; Terry P Subst Use Misuse; 2016 Nov; 51(13):1781-9. PubMed ID: 27556869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A drink is a drink? Variation in the amount of alcohol contained in beer, wine and spirits drinks in a US methodological sample. Kerr WC; Greenfield TK; Tujague J; Brown SE Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2005 Nov; 29(11):2015-21. PubMed ID: 16340459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Alcohol content variation of bar and restaurant drinks in Northern California. Kerr WC; Patterson D; Koenen MA; Greenfield TK Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2008 Sep; 32(9):1623-9. PubMed ID: 18616674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Empirical evaluation of the presence of a label containing standard drinks on pour accuracy among US college students. Brunk E; Becker MW; Bix L PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241583. PubMed ID: 33151959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Federal Trade Commission's mandated Four Loko labeling fails to facilitate accurate estimation of alcohol content by college students. Rossheim ME; Yurasek AM; Greene KM; Gonzalez-Pons KM; Barry AE; Thombs DL; Trangenstein PJ; Nelson C; Cavazos T; Treffers RD; Jernigan DH Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 2020 Jul; 46(4):430-437. PubMed ID: 31592678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shooting shots: Estimating alcoholic drink sizes in real life using event-level reports and annotations of close-up pictures. Labhart F; Phan TT; Gatica-Perez D; Kuntsche E Drug Alcohol Rev; 2021 Nov; 40(7):1228-1238. PubMed ID: 33200551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of alcohol packaging size and strength on U.K. alcohol consumers' classification of alcohol products as containing a single or multiple drinks. Kersbergen I; Opazo Breton M; Field M; Meier P Psychol Addict Behav; 2023 Nov; 37(7):969-976. PubMed ID: 35758980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What are the perceived target groups and occasions for wines and beers labelled with verbal and numerical descriptors of lower alcohol strength? An experimental study. Vasiljevic M; Couturier DL; Marteau TM BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e024412. PubMed ID: 31189670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adjustments for drink size and ethanol content: new results from a self-report diary and transdermal sensor validation study. Bond JC; Greenfield TK; Patterson D; Kerr WC Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2014 Dec; 38(12):3060-7. PubMed ID: 25581661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Hispanic Americans baseline alcohol survey: alcoholic beverage preference across Hispanic national groups. Caetano R; Vaeth PA; Ramisetty-Mikler S; Rodriguez LA Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2009 Jan; 33(1):150-9. PubMed ID: 18976346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measured alcohol content in college party mixed drinks. Barnett NP; Wei J; Czachowski C Psychol Addict Behav; 2009 Mar; 23(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 19290700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What do binge drinkers drink? Implications for alcohol control policy. Naimi TS; Brewer RD; Miller JW; Okoro C; Mehrotra C Am J Prev Med; 2007 Sep; 33(3):188-93. PubMed ID: 17826577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The alcohol content of self-report and 'standard' drinks. Lemmens PH Addiction; 1994 May; 89(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 8044126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of lower strength alcohol labeling on consumption: A randomized controlled trial. Vasiljevic M; Couturier DL; Frings D; Moss AC; Albery IP; Marteau TM Health Psychol; 2018 Jul; 37(7):658-667. PubMed ID: 29698021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "My drink is larger than yours"? A literature review of self-defined drink sizes and standard drinks. Devos-Comby L; Lange JE Curr Drug Abuse Rev; 2008 Jun; 1(2):162-76. PubMed ID: 19630715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Not all drinks are created equal: implications for alcohol assessment in India. Nayak MB; Kerr W; Greenfield TK; Pillai A Alcohol Alcohol; 2008; 43(6):713-8. PubMed ID: 18832137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Large drinks are no mistake: glass size, not shape, affects alcoholic beverage drink pours. Kerr WC; Patterson D; Koenen MA; Greenfield TK Drug Alcohol Rev; 2009 Jul; 28(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 19594789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimates of the mean alcohol concentration of the spirits, wine, and beer sold in the United States and per capita consumption: 1950 to 2002. Kerr WC; Greenfield TK; Tujague J Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1583-91. PubMed ID: 16930221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Singaporean college students overpour drinks similar to Western populations: influence of peer presence in a simulated alcohol-pouring task. Zandy SL; Pang JS; Ho MH; Matthews DB Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2013 Nov; 37(11):1963-70. PubMed ID: 23888884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Do college students drink more than they think? Use of a free-pour paradigm to determine how college students define standard drinks. White AM; Kraus CL; McCracken LA; Swartzwelder HS Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2003 Nov; 27(11):1750-6. PubMed ID: 14634490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]