BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2755763)

  • 1. Speech perception by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): the voiced-voiceless distinction.
    Dooling RJ; Okanoya K; Brown SD
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 2755763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech perception by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): spoken vowels.
    Dooling RJ; Brown SD
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jun; 47(6):568-74. PubMed ID: 2367177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experience with speech sounds is not necessary for cue trading by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Flaherty M; Dent ML; Sawusch JR
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177676. PubMed ID: 28562597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrimination of synthetic full-formant and sinewave/ra-la/continua by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Dooling RJ; Best CT; Brown SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Mar; 97(3):1839-46. PubMed ID: 7699165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of synthetic /ba/-/wa/ speech continuum by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Dent ML; Brittan-Powell EF; Dooling RJ; Pierce A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Sep; 102(3):1891-7. PubMed ID: 9301066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): II. Vocal signals.
    Dooling RJ; Park TJ; Brown SD; Okanoya K; Soli SD
    J Comp Psychol; 1987 Dec; 101(4):367-381. PubMed ID: 3691060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of vocal signals by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Dooling RJ
    Exp Biol; 1986; 45(3):195-218. PubMed ID: 3732497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of syllable-final segment duration on the identification of synthetic speech continua by birds and humans.
    Welch TE; Sawusch JR; Dent ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2779-87. PubMed ID: 19894853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): I. Pure tones.
    Dooling RJ; Brown SD; Park TJ; Okanoya K; Soli SD
    J Comp Psychol; 1987 Jun; 101(2):139-149. PubMed ID: 3608422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast effects on stop consonant identification.
    Diehl RL; Elman JL; McCusker SB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Nov; 4(4):599-609. PubMed ID: 722250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Categorical perception of speech sounds via the tactile mode.
    Collins MJ; Hurtig RR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Dec; 28(4):594-8. PubMed ID: 4087895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): III. Contact calls.
    Brown SD; Dooling RJ; O'Grady KE
    J Comp Psychol; 1988 Sep; 102(3):236-247. PubMed ID: 3180731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Natural boundaries in gap detection are related to categorical perception of stop consonants.
    Elangovan S; Stuart A
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):761-74. PubMed ID: 18769272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination of voice onset time by human infants: new findings and implications for the effects of early experience.
    Aslin RN; Pisoni DB; Hennessy BL; Perey AJ
    Child Dev; 1981; 52(4):1135-45. PubMed ID: 7318516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Voice onset time in young and 70-year-old women.
    Neiman GS; Klich RJ; Shuey EM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Mar; 26(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 6865367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory perception of conspecific and heterospecific vocalizations in birds: evidence for special processes.
    Dooling RJ; Brown SD; Klump GM; Okanoya K
    J Comp Psychol; 1992 Mar; 106(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 1555398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Training severely hearing-impaired children in the discrimination of the voiced-voiceless distinction.
    Bennett CW
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(6):213-8. PubMed ID: 893191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of number of repetitions and intensity level of stimuli varying in VOT on verbal transformations.
    Ohde RN; Sharf DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Nov; 68(5):1266-70. PubMed ID: 7440850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of categorical identification of native and non-native bilabial stops: infants, children and adults.
    Burnham DK; Earnshaw LJ; Clark JE
    J Child Lang; 1991 Jun; 18(2):231-60. PubMed ID: 1874826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Obtaining acoustic similarity measures from animals: a method for species comparisons.
    Okanoya K; Dooling RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Apr; 83(4):1690-3. PubMed ID: 3372876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.