These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2755763)

  • 1. Speech perception by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): the voiced-voiceless distinction.
    Dooling RJ; Okanoya K; Brown SD
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 2755763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech perception by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): spoken vowels.
    Dooling RJ; Brown SD
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jun; 47(6):568-74. PubMed ID: 2367177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experience with speech sounds is not necessary for cue trading by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Flaherty M; Dent ML; Sawusch JR
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177676. PubMed ID: 28562597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrimination of synthetic full-formant and sinewave/ra-la/continua by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Dooling RJ; Best CT; Brown SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Mar; 97(3):1839-46. PubMed ID: 7699165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of synthetic /ba/-/wa/ speech continuum by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Dent ML; Brittan-Powell EF; Dooling RJ; Pierce A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Sep; 102(3):1891-7. PubMed ID: 9301066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): II. Vocal signals.
    Dooling RJ; Park TJ; Brown SD; Okanoya K; Soli SD
    J Comp Psychol; 1987 Dec; 101(4):367-381. PubMed ID: 3691060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of vocal signals by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Dooling RJ
    Exp Biol; 1986; 45(3):195-218. PubMed ID: 3732497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of syllable-final segment duration on the identification of synthetic speech continua by birds and humans.
    Welch TE; Sawusch JR; Dent ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2779-87. PubMed ID: 19894853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): I. Pure tones.
    Dooling RJ; Brown SD; Park TJ; Okanoya K; Soli SD
    J Comp Psychol; 1987 Jun; 101(2):139-149. PubMed ID: 3608422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast effects on stop consonant identification.
    Diehl RL; Elman JL; McCusker SB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1978 Nov; 4(4):599-609. PubMed ID: 722250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Categorical perception of speech sounds via the tactile mode.
    Collins MJ; Hurtig RR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Dec; 28(4):594-8. PubMed ID: 4087895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual organization of acoustic stimuli by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): III. Contact calls.
    Brown SD; Dooling RJ; O'Grady KE
    J Comp Psychol; 1988 Sep; 102(3):236-247. PubMed ID: 3180731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Natural boundaries in gap detection are related to categorical perception of stop consonants.
    Elangovan S; Stuart A
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):761-74. PubMed ID: 18769272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination of voice onset time by human infants: new findings and implications for the effects of early experience.
    Aslin RN; Pisoni DB; Hennessy BL; Perey AJ
    Child Dev; 1981; 52(4):1135-45. PubMed ID: 7318516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Voice onset time in young and 70-year-old women.
    Neiman GS; Klich RJ; Shuey EM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Mar; 26(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 6865367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory perception of conspecific and heterospecific vocalizations in birds: evidence for special processes.
    Dooling RJ; Brown SD; Klump GM; Okanoya K
    J Comp Psychol; 1992 Mar; 106(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 1555398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Training severely hearing-impaired children in the discrimination of the voiced-voiceless distinction.
    Bennett CW
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(6):213-8. PubMed ID: 893191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of number of repetitions and intensity level of stimuli varying in VOT on verbal transformations.
    Ohde RN; Sharf DJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Nov; 68(5):1266-70. PubMed ID: 7440850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of categorical identification of native and non-native bilabial stops: infants, children and adults.
    Burnham DK; Earnshaw LJ; Clark JE
    J Child Lang; 1991 Jun; 18(2):231-60. PubMed ID: 1874826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Obtaining acoustic similarity measures from animals: a method for species comparisons.
    Okanoya K; Dooling RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Apr; 83(4):1690-3. PubMed ID: 3372876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.