These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2755764)
1. Discriminability and dimensionality effects in visual search for featural conjunctions: a functional pop-out. Dehaene S Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 2755764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Heterogeneity effects in visual search predicted from the group scanning model. Macquistan AD Can J Exp Psychol; 1994 Dec; 48(4):495-515. PubMed ID: 7866391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Before you see it, you see its parts: evidence for feature encoding and integration in preschool children and adults. Thompson LA; Massaro DW Cogn Psychol; 1989 Jul; 21(3):334-62. PubMed ID: 2758784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Wolfe JM; Cave KR; Franzel SL J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):419-33. PubMed ID: 2527952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions. Treisman A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):652-76. PubMed ID: 1834783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources. VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. Cohen A; Ivry R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Nov; 15(4):650-63. PubMed ID: 2531202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. Treisman A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Apr; 8(2):194-214. PubMed ID: 6461717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of feature similarity on illusory conjunctions. Ivry RB; Prinzmetal W Percept Psychophys; 1991 Feb; 49(2):105-16. PubMed ID: 2017349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual search for feature singletons: multiple mechanisms produce sequence effects in visual search. Rangelov D; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M J Vis; 2013 Aug; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23912066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Visual search for simple volumetric shapes. Brown JM; Weisstein N; May JG Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jan; 51(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 1549423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the speed of pop-out in feature search. Turatto M; Valsecchi M; Seiffert AE; Caramazza A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1145-52. PubMed ID: 20718563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. Briand KA; Klein RM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 May; 13(2):228-41. PubMed ID: 2953853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A formal theory of feature binding in object perception. Ashby FG; Prinzmetal W; Ivry R; Maddox WT Psychol Rev; 1996 Jan; 103(1):165-92. PubMed ID: 8650297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Visual search for direction of shading is influenced by apparent depth. Aks DJ; Enns JT Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jul; 52(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 1635858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Density effects in conjunction search: evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration. Cohen A; Ivry RB J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):891-901. PubMed ID: 1837302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]