These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27557676)
1. Intention-to-treat and transparency of related practices in randomized, controlled trials of anti-infectives. Beckett RD; Loeser KC; Bowman KR; Towne TG BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):106. PubMed ID: 27557676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modified versus standard intention-to-treat reporting: are there differences in methodological quality, sponsorship, and findings in randomized trials? A cross-sectional study. Montedori A; Bonacini MI; Casazza G; Luchetta ML; Duca P; Cozzolino F; Abraha I Trials; 2011 Feb; 12():58. PubMed ID: 21356072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intention to treat (ITT) analysis as reported in orthodontic randomized controlled trials-evaluations of methodology and recommendations for the accurate use of ITT analysis and handling dropouts. Bondemark L; Abdulraheem S Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):409-413. PubMed ID: 29069355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Handling missing data in RCTs; a review of the top medical journals. Bell ML; Fiero M; Horton NJ; Hsu CH BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Nov; 14():118. PubMed ID: 25407057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The intention-to-treat approach in randomized controlled trials: are authors saying what they do and doing what they say? Gravel J; Opatrny L; Shapiro S Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 17848496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of the intention-to-treat principle in nursing clinical trials. Polit DF; Gillespie BM Nurs Res; 2009; 58(6):391-9. PubMed ID: 19918150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study. Abraha I; Cherubini A; Cozzolino F; De Florio R; Luchetta ML; Rimland JM; Folletti I; Marchesi M; Germani A; Orso M; Eusebi P; Montedori A BMJ; 2015 May; 350():h2445. PubMed ID: 26016488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review finds variable use of the intention-to-treat principle in musculoskeletal randomized controlled trials with missing data. Joseph R; Sim J; Ogollah R; Lewis M J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 25304501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inconsistent definitions for intention-to-treat in relation to missing outcome data: systematic review of the methods literature. Alshurafa M; Briel M; Akl EA; Haines T; Moayyedi P; Gentles SJ; Rios L; Tran C; Bhatnagar N; Lamontagne F; Walter SD; Guyatt GH PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49163. PubMed ID: 23166608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A systematic review found that deviations from intention-to-treat are common in randomized trials and systematic reviews. Abraha I; Cozzolino F; Orso M; Marchesi M; Germani A; Lombardo G; Eusebi P; De Florio R; Luchetta ML; Iorio A; Montedori A J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 84():37-46. PubMed ID: 28088592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Addressing missing participant outcome data in dental clinical trials. Spineli LM; Fleming PS; Pandis N J Dent; 2015 Jun; 43(6):605-18. PubMed ID: 25837533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analyzing phase III studies in hospice/palliative care. a solution that sits between intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses: the palliative-modified ITT analysis. Currow DC; Plummer JL; Kutner JS; Samsa GP; Abernethy AP J Pain Symptom Manage; 2012 Oct; 44(4):595-603. PubMed ID: 22819439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intention to treat and per protocol analysis in clinical trials. Tripepi G; Chesnaye NC; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ Nephrology (Carlton); 2020 Jul; 25(7):513-517. PubMed ID: 32147926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Choosing the analysis population in non-inferiority studies: per protocol or intent-to-treat. Matilde Sanchez M; Chen X Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1169-81. PubMed ID: 16397861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modified intention-to-treat analysis did not bias trial results. Dossing A; Tarp S; Furst DE; Gluud C; Wells GA; Beyene J; Hansen BB; Bliddal H; Christensen R J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 72():66-74. PubMed ID: 26562052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rationale for randomized controlled trials and for intention-to-treat analysis in transfusion medicine: are they one and the same? Vamvakas EC Vox Sang; 2008 Oct; 95(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 19121180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intention-to-treat analysis may be more conservative than per protocol analysis in antibiotic non-inferiority trials: a systematic review. Bai AD; Komorowski AS; Lo CKL; Tandon P; Li XX; Mokashi V; Cvetkovic A; Findlater A; Liang L; Tomlinson G; Loeb M; Mertz D; BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Apr; 21(1):75. PubMed ID: 33874894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intention-to-treat analyses in behavioral medicine randomized clinical trials. Pagoto SL; Kozak AT; John P; Bodenlos JS; Hedeker D; Spring B; Schneider KL Int J Behav Med; 2009; 16(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 19319693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intention-to-treat in randomized controlled trials: recommendations for a total trial strategy. Polit DF; Gillespie BM Res Nurs Health; 2010 Aug; 33(4):355-68. PubMed ID: 20645423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intention to treat and per protocol analyses: differences and similarities. Molero-Calafell J; BurĂ³n A; Castells X; Porta M J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Sep; 173():111457. PubMed ID: 38977160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]