265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27558090)
21. Wall stress analysis in small asymptomatic, symptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Truijers M; Pol JA; Schultzekool LJ; van Sterkenburg SM; Fillinger MF; Blankensteijn JD
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 17137809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Correlation between transversal and orthogonal maximal diameters of abdominal aortic aneurysms and alternative rupture risk predictors.
Novak K; Polzer S; Krivka T; Vlachovsky R; Staffa R; Kubicek L; Lambert L; Bursa J
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Apr; 83():151-156. PubMed ID: 28282590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Correlation of Intraluminal Thrombus Deposition, Biomechanics, and Hemodynamics with Surface Growth and Rupture in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm-Application in a Clinical Paradigm.
Metaxa E; Tzirakis K; Kontopodis N; Ioannou CV; Papaharilaou Y
Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Jan; 46():357-366. PubMed ID: 28887252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Local wall thickness in finite element models improves prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth.
Shang EK; Nathan DP; Woo EY; Fairman RM; Wang GJ; Gorman RC; Gorman JH; Jackson BM
J Vasc Surg; 2015 Jan; 61(1):217-23. PubMed ID: 24095043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Low wall shear stress predominates at sites of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.
Boyd AJ; Kuhn DC; Lozowy RJ; Kulbisky GP
J Vasc Surg; 2016 Jun; 63(6):1613-9. PubMed ID: 25752691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms based on a novel probabilistic rupture risk index.
Polzer S; Gasser TC
J R Soc Interface; 2015 Dec; 12(113):20150852. PubMed ID: 26631334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reproducibility of deriving parameters of AAA rupture risk from patient-specific 3D finite element models.
Hyhlik-Dürr A; Krieger T; Geisbüsch P; Kotelis D; Able T; Böckler D
J Endovasc Ther; 2011 Jun; 18(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 21679063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Additional value of biomechanical indices based on CTa for rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Leemans EL; Willems TP; Slump CH; van der Laan MJ; Zeebregts CJ
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202672. PubMed ID: 30133522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Feasibility of wall stress analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms using three-dimensional ultrasound.
Kok AM; Nguyen VL; Speelman L; Brands PJ; Schurink GW; van de Vosse FN; Lopata RG
J Vasc Surg; 2015 May; 61(5):1175-84. PubMed ID: 25701496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Morphological and Biomechanical Features in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with Long and Short Neck-Case-Control Study in 64 Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.
Koncar IB; Nikolic D; Milosevic Z; Ilic N; Dragas M; Sladojevic M; Markovic M; Filipovic N; Davidovic L
Ann Vasc Surg; 2017 Nov; 45():223-230. PubMed ID: 28666818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Systematic Review of Circulating, Biomechanical, and Genetic Markers for the Prediction of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth and Rupture.
Groeneveld ME; Meekel JP; Rubinstein SM; Merkestein LR; Tangelder GJ; Wisselink W; Truijers M; Yeung KK
J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Jun; 7(13):. PubMed ID: 29960996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Patient-specific biomechanical profiling in abdominal aortic aneurysm development and rupture.
Malkawi AH; Hinchliffe RJ; Xu Y; Holt PJ; Loftus IM; Thompson MM
J Vasc Surg; 2010 Aug; 52(2):480-8. PubMed ID: 20395107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The impact of model assumptions on results of computational mechanics in abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Reeps C; Gee M; Maier A; Gurdan M; Eckstein HH; Wall WA
J Vasc Surg; 2010 Mar; 51(3):679-88. PubMed ID: 20206812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparison of diameter, wall stress, and rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction.
Maier A; Gee MW; Reeps C; Pongratz J; Eckstein HH; Wall WA
Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Oct; 38(10):3124-34. PubMed ID: 20480238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: model complexity versus predictability of finite element simulations.
Gasser TC; Auer M; Labruto F; Swedenborg J; Roy J
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Aug; 40(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 20447844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of intraluminal thrombus asymmetrical deposition on abdominal aortic aneurysm growth rate.
Metaxa E; Kontopodis N; Tzirakis K; Ioannou CV; Papaharilaou Y
J Endovasc Ther; 2015 Jun; 22(3):406-12. PubMed ID: 25900725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Association between aneurysm shoulder stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion: a longitudinal follow-up study.
Li ZY; Sadat U; U-King-Im J; Tang TY; Bowden DJ; Hayes PD; Gillard JH
Circulation; 2010 Nov; 122(18):1815-22. PubMed ID: 20956212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. On the influence of wall calcification and intraluminal thrombus on prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.
Barrett HE; Cunnane EM; Hidayat H; O'Brien JM; Moloney MA; Kavanagh EG; Walsh MT
J Vasc Surg; 2018 Apr; 67(4):1234-1246.e2. PubMed ID: 28899569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical indices are more sensitive than diameter in predicting rupture of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Polzer S; Gasser TC; Vlachovský R; Kubíček L; Lambert L; Man V; Novák K; Slažanský M; Burša J; Staffa R
J Vasc Surg; 2020 Feb; 71(2):617-626.e6. PubMed ID: 31176634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Raghavan ML; Vorp DA; Federle MP; Makaroun MS; Webster MW
J Vasc Surg; 2000 Apr; 31(4):760-9. PubMed ID: 10753284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
