These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27558572)

  • 1. A Comparison Study Between Point-of-Care Testing Systems and Central Laboratory for Determining Blood Glucose in Venous Blood.
    Wei H; Lan F; He Q; Li H; Zhang F; Qin X; Li S
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2017 May; 31(3):. PubMed ID: 27558572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Point-of-Care Blood Glucose Testing: Post-Market Performance Assessment of the Accu-Chek Inform II Hospital-Use Glucose Meter].
    Petryaykina EE; Mayanskiy NA; Demina ES; Karamysheva IV; Gorst KA; Timofeev AV
    Ter Arkh; 2023 Dec; 95(12):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 38785055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Capillary glucose concentration during oral glucose tolerance test for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes.
    García-Claver A; Ramos-Corral R; Laviña-Fañanás C; Solans-Blecua I; Puzo-Foncillas J
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2020 Aug; 150(2):234-240. PubMed ID: 32320486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maltose interference-free test strips for blood glucose testing at point-of-care: a laboratory performance evaluation.
    Ng WY; Tiong CC; Jacob E
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Nov; 12(11):889-93. PubMed ID: 20879959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of several point-of-care testing (POCT) glucometers with an established laboratory procedure for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes using the discordance rate. A new statistical approach.
    Püntmann I; Wosniok W; Haeckel R
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Jun; 41(6):809-20. PubMed ID: 12880146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. System accuracy evaluation of systems for point-of-care testing of blood glucose: a comparison of a patient-use system with six professional-use systems.
    Freckmann G; Schmid C; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Link M; Stolberg E; Haug C; Sieber J
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2014 Jul; 52(7):1079-86. PubMed ID: 24681433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of bedside glucose measurement from three glucometers in critically ill patients.
    Hoedemaekers CW; Klein Gunnewiek JM; Prinsen MA; Willems JL; Van der Hoeven JG
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):3062-6. PubMed ID: 18824915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Accu Chek Inform II point-of-care test blood glucose meter with Hexokinase Plasma method for a diabetes mellitus population during surgery under general anesthesia.
    Lascaris B; Freling HG; Edens MA; Fokkert MJ; Olthof CG; Slingerland RJ
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2022 Apr; 36(2):355-361. PubMed ID: 33496941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in the Hands of Intended Users and Trained Personnel Based on ISO 15197 Requirements.
    Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Rittmeyer D; Pleus S; Haug C
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Apr; 19(4):246-254. PubMed ID: 28225633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison between point-of-care testing and venous glucose determination for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus 6-12 weeks after gestational diabetes.
    Coetzee A; van de Vyver M; Hoffmann M; Hall DR; Mason D; Conradie M
    Diabet Med; 2019 May; 36(5):591-599. PubMed ID: 30663133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems for Self-Testing with Built-in Insulin Dose Advisor Based on ISO 15197:2013: System Accuracy and Hematocrit Influence.
    Jendrike N; Baumstark A; Pleus S; Liebing C; Beer A; Flacke F; Haug C; Freckmann G
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Apr; 20(4):303-313. PubMed ID: 29664706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inaccuracy of Venous Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Pereira AJ; Corrêa TD; de Almeida FP; Deliberato RO; Lobato Mdos S; Akamine N; Silva E; Cavalcanti AB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129568. PubMed ID: 26067093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy and precision of four main glucometers used in a Sub-Saharan African Country: a cross-sectional study.
    Choukem SP; Sih C; Nebongo D; Tientcheu P; Kengne AP
    Pan Afr Med J; 2019; 32():118. PubMed ID: 31223408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. System accuracy evaluation of 18 CE-marked current-generation blood glucose monitoring systems based on EN ISO 15197:2015.
    Pleus S; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Mende J; Link M; Zschornack E; Haug C; Freckmann G
    BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care; 2020 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 31958308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A glucose meter accuracy and precision comparison: the FreeStyle Flash Versus the Accu-Chek Advantage, Accu-Chek Compact Plus, Ascensia Contour, and the BD Logic.
    Thomas LE; Kane MP; Bakst G; Busch RS; Hamilton RA; Abelseth JM
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Apr; 10(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 18260773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Accuracy of Six Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems and Modeling of Possibly Related Insulin Dosing Errors.
    Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Pleus S; Haug C; Freckmann G
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Oct; 19(10):580-588. PubMed ID: 28704063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Five Blood Glucose Systems in the Hypo-, Eu-, and Hyperglycemic Range.
    Zijlstra E; Heinemann L; Fischer A; Kapitza C
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 10(6):1316-1323. PubMed ID: 27605592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. System Accuracy Evaluation of Four Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Following ISO 15197 Using a Glucose Oxidase and a Hexokinase-Based Comparison Method.
    Link M; Schmid C; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Rittmeyer D; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 9(5):1041-50. PubMed ID: 25872967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197.
    Baumstark A; Pleus S; Schmid C; Link M; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 6(5):1076-86. PubMed ID: 23063033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Hemoglobin Measurements by 3 Point-of-Care Devices With Standard Laboratory Values and Reliability Regarding Decisions for Blood Transfusion.
    Johnson M; Marwick PC; Coetzee JF
    Anesth Analg; 2020 Aug; 131(2):640-649. PubMed ID: 31764158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.