239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27559031)
61. Model of glucose sensor error components: identification and assessment for new Dexcom G4 generation devices.
Facchinetti A; Del Favero S; Sparacino G; Cobelli C
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Dec; 53(12):1259-69. PubMed ID: 25416850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System with TRUstart algorithm, a 1-hour warm-up time.
Geoffrey M; Brazg R; Richard W
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Jan; 5(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 21303631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Accuracy and User Performance Evaluation of a New, Wireless-enabled Blood Glucose Monitoring System That Links to a Smart Mobile Device.
Bailey TS; Wallace JF; Pardo S; Warchal-Windham ME; Harrison B; Morin R; Christiansen M
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Jul; 11(4):736-743. PubMed ID: 28617617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Detection of hypoglycemia with continuous interstitial and traditional blood glucose monitoring using the FreeStyle Navigator Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.
McGarraugh G; Bergenstal R
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Mar; 11(3):145-50. PubMed ID: 19216686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Accuracy of a flash glucose monitoring system in cats and determination of the time lag between blood glucose and interstitial glucose concentrations.
Del Baldo F; Fracassi F; Pires J; Tardo AM; Malerba E; Manassero E; Gilor C
J Vet Intern Med; 2021 May; 35(3):1279-1287. PubMed ID: 33991129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Accuracy of the Enlite 6-day glucose sensor with guardian and Veo calibration algorithms.
Keenan DB; Mastrototaro JJ; Zisser H; Cooper KA; Raghavendhar G; Lee SW; Yusi J; Bailey TS; Brazg RL; Shah RV
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Mar; 14(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 22145851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Performance of the Freestyle Libre flash glucose monitoring (flash GM) system in individuals with type 1 diabetes: A secondary outcome analysis of a randomized crossover trial.
Moser O; Eckstein ML; McCarthy O; Deere R; Pitt J; Williams DM; Hayes J; Sourij H; Bain SC; Bracken RM
Diabetes Obes Metab; 2019 Nov; 21(11):2505-2512. PubMed ID: 31332929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting.
Klaff LJ; Brazg R; Hughes K; Tideman AM; Schachner HC; Stenger P; Pardo S; Dunne N; Parkes JL
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Jan; 17(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 25260047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Graphical and numerical evaluation of continuous glucose sensing time lag.
Kovatchev BP; Shields D; Breton M
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Mar; 11(3):139-43. PubMed ID: 19216687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Comparative Accuracy Analysis of a Real-time and an Intermittent-Scanning Continuous Glucose Monitoring System.
Link M; Kamecke U; Waldenmaier D; Pleus S; Garcia A; Haug C; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2021 Mar; 15(2):287-293. PubMed ID: 31847555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197.
Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Zschornack E; Kocher S; Tshiananga J; Heister F; Haug C
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Mar; 12(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 20151773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Evaluation of the FreeStyle Libre, a flash glucose monitoring system, in client-owned cats with diabetes mellitus.
Knies M; Teske E; Kooistra H
J Feline Med Surg; 2022 Aug; 24(8):e223-e231. PubMed ID: 35762266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Accuracy and User Performance of a New Blood Glucose Monitoring System.
Klaff L; Shelat P; Zondorak D; Wayland-Smith A; Vernes P; Richardson JM
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2021 Nov; 15(6):1382-1389. PubMed ID: 33243009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Evaluation of the performance of a novel system for continuous glucose monitoring.
Zschornack E; Schmid C; Pleus S; Link M; Klötzer HM; Obermaier K; Schoemaker M; Strasser M; Frisch G; Schmelzeisen-Redeker G; Haug C; Freckmann G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jul; 7(4):815-23. PubMed ID: 23911162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Evaluation of continuous flash glucose monitoring in a pediatric ICU setting.
Kotzapanagiotou E; Tsotridou E; Volakli E; Dimitriadou M; Chochliourou E; Kalamitsou S; Kotzapanagiotou F; Sdougka M; Christoforidis A
J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Aug; 34(4):843-852. PubMed ID: 31482363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. First assessment of the performance of an implantable continuous glucose monitoring system through 180 days in a primarily adolescent population with type 1 diabetes.
Aronson R; Abitbol A; Tweden KS
Diabetes Obes Metab; 2019 Jul; 21(7):1689-1694. PubMed ID: 30938036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Performance of a new blood glucose monitoring system in the hands of intended users.
Bailey TS; Wallace JF; Parkes JL; Pardo S; Yu J; Schachner HC; Simmons DA; Chu A
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Sep; 14(9):783-9. PubMed ID: 22746838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Performance Evaluation of the C-CGM System.
Rebec M; Cai K; Dutt-Ballerstadt R; Anderson E
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2022 Mar; 16(2):390-396. PubMed ID: 33084416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. A comparison of statistical techniques to evaluate the performance of the Glucometer Elite blood glucose meter.
Harrison B; Markes R; Bradley P; Ismail IA
Clin Biochem; 1996 Dec; 29(6):521-7. PubMed ID: 8939399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Performance and Usability of Three Systems for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Direct Comparison.
Freckmann G; Link M; Kamecke U; Haug C; Baumgartner B; Weitgasser R
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 Sep; 13(5):890-898. PubMed ID: 30730229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
